Technical difficulties have been reported by some users of the search function and is being investigated by technical staff. Thank you for your patience and apologies for any inconvenience caused.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov

For full trial details, please see the original record at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03064126




Registration number
NCT03064126
Ethics application status
Date submitted
13/01/2017
Date registered
24/02/2017
Date last updated
30/04/2024

Titles & IDs
Public title
RANGERâ„¢ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty
Scientific title
RANGER II SFA: A 3:1 Randomized Trial Comparing the Boston Scientific RANGERâ„¢ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon vs Standard Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Superficial Femoral Arteries (SFA) and Proximal Popliteal Arteries (PPA)
Secondary ID [1] 0 0
S2062
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
RANGER II SFA
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Peripheral Artery Disease 0 0
Atherosclerosis 0 0
Artery Diseases, Peripheral 0 0
Plaque, Atherosclerotic 0 0
Occlusive Arterial Disease 0 0
Condition category
Condition code
Cardiovascular 0 0 0 0
Diseases of the vasculature and circulation including the lymphatic system

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Devices - RANGERâ„¢ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon
Treatment: Drugs - Paclitaxel
Treatment: Surgery - Standard Balloon Angioplasty

Experimental: RANGERâ„¢ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon - RANGERâ„¢ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon Catheter angioplasty in the SFA/PPA at the index procedure.
Subjects will be randomized 3:1 to the drug coated or standard angioplasty balloon.

Active Comparator: Standard Balloon Angioplasty - Standard Balloon Catheter angioplasty in the SFA/PPA at the index procedure. Subjects will be randomized 3:1 to the drug coated or standard angioplasty balloon.


Treatment: Devices: RANGERâ„¢ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon
A procedure that utilizes a balloon coated with paclitaxel (drug) which can open up a blocked blood vessel using a small, flexible plastic tube, or catheter, with a "balloon" at the end of it. When the tube is in place, it inflates to open the blood vessel, or artery, so that normal blood flow is restored. The tube is then removed. The blood vessels that will be treated in the RANGER II SFA study include the superficial femoral arteries and the proximal popliteal arteries.

Treatment: Drugs: Paclitaxel
The RANGERâ„¢ Balloon is coated with the drug Paclitaxel.

Treatment: Surgery: Standard Balloon Angioplasty
A procedure that utilizes an uncoated balloon which can open up a blocked blood vessel using a small, flexible plastic tube, or catheter, with a "balloon" at the end of it. When the tube is in place, it inflates to open the blood vessel, or artery, so that normal blood flow is restored. The tube is then removed. The blood vessels that will be treated in the RANGER II SFA study include the superficial femoral arteries and the proximal popliteal arteries.

Intervention code [1] 0 0
Treatment: Devices
Intervention code [2] 0 0
Treatment: Drugs
Intervention code [3] 0 0
Treatment: Surgery
Comparator / control treatment
Control group

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 0 0
Number of Participants With Primary Lesion Patency
Timepoint [1] 0 0
12 months (6 months for LB substudy)
Primary outcome [2] 0 0
Major Adverse Events (MAEs) (Primary Safety Endpoint)
Timepoint [2] 0 0
12 months (6 months for LB substudy)
Secondary outcome [1] 0 0
Number of Participants With Technical Success of Angioplasty Procedure
Timepoint [1] 0 0
Day 0
Secondary outcome [2] 0 0
Number of Participants With Procedural Success of Angioplasty Procedure
Timepoint [2] 0 0
Day 0
Secondary outcome [3] 0 0
Number of Participants With Clinical Success Rate Assessment
Timepoint [3] 0 0
Day 0
Secondary outcome [4] 0 0
Number of Major Adverse Event (MAE) Assessment
Timepoint [4] 0 0
12 months (6 months for LB substudy)
Secondary outcome [5] 0 0
Number of CEC Adjudicated Events Through 12 Months
Timepoint [5] 0 0
12 months (6 Months for LB Substudy)
Secondary outcome [6] 0 0
Number of Participants With Rate of Primary Sustained Clinical Improvement as Assessed by Changes in Rutherford Classification From Baseline
Timepoint [6] 0 0
12 months (6 months for LB substudy)
Secondary outcome [7] 0 0
Number of Participants With Rate of Secondary Sustained Clinical Improvement as Assessed by Changes in Rutherford Classification
Timepoint [7] 0 0
12 months (6 months for LB substudy)
Secondary outcome [8] 0 0
Number of Participants With Rate of Hemodynamic Improvement as Assessed by Changes in Ankle Brachial Index (ABI)
Timepoint [8] 0 0
12 months (6 months for LB substudy)
Secondary outcome [9] 0 0
Walking Improvement (Distance) Assessed by Change in Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Timepoint [9] 0 0
12 months
Secondary outcome [10] 0 0
Walking Improvement Assessed by Change in Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) From Baseline
Timepoint [10] 0 0
12 months

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Subject (or Legal Guardian) is willing and able to provide consent before any
study-specific tests or procedures are performed and agree to attend all required
follow-up visits;

2. Subject at least 20 years of age;

3. Chronic symptomatic lower limb ischemia defined as Rutherford classification 2, 3, or
4;

4. Target lesion is in the native SFA and/or PPA down to the P1 segment;

5. Patent popliteal and infrapopliteal arteries, i.e., single vessel runoff or better
with at least one of three vessels patent (less than 50 % stenosis) to the ankle or
foot;

6. Reference vessel diameter = 4 mm and = 8 mm by visual estimate;

7. Angiographic evidence that target lesion consists of a single de novo, non-stented and
non-atherectomy treated or restenotic lesion (or tandem lesions or a combination
lesion as defined below) that is:

- = 70%-99% stenotic with total lesion length up to 180 mm by visual estimate.

- Occluded with total lesion length = 100 mm by visual estimate.

- If lesion is restenotic, most recent PTA treatment must be > 3 months prior to
enrollment.
Minimum age
20 Years
Maximum age
No limit
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
1. Life expectancy, documented in the Investigator's opinion, of less than 12 months;

2. Hemorrhagic stroke or cardiac event (e.g. STEMI, unstable angina) within 6 months
prior to enrollment;

3. Known allergies or sensitivities to heparin, aspirin, other anticoagulant/antiplatelet
therapies, and/or paclitaxel;

4. Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to contrast dye that, in the opinion of the
investigator, cannot be adequately pre-medicated;

5. Chronic renal insufficiency with serum creatinine > 2.0 mg/dL within 30 days of index
procedure or treatment with dialysis;

6. Platelet count < 80,000 mm 3 or > 600,000 mm 3 or history of bleeding diathesis;

7. Receiving immunosuppressive therapy;

8. Septicemia at the time of enrollment;

9. Any major intervention planned within 30 days post index procedure;

10. Presence of other hemodynamically significant outflow lesions in the target limb
requiring intervention within 30 days of enrollment;

11. Failure to successfully cross the target lesion with a guidewire;

12. Failure to successfully pre-dilate the target vessel;

13. Patient has lesion that requires the use of adjunctive primary treatment modalities
(i.e. laser, atherectomy, scoring/cutting balloon, other debulking devices, etc.)
during the index procedure;

14. History of major amputation in the target limb;

15. Target lesion or vessel has ever been previously treated with stent (e.g. in-stent
restenosis) or surgery. Target lesion or vessel has been treated with atherectomy or a
DCB in the past 12 months;

16. Pregnant or breast feeding;

17. Presence of aneurysm in the target vessel;

18. Acute ischemia and/or acute thrombosis of the SFA/PPA prior to enrollment;

19. Patient has significant inflow disease which cannot be treated prior to the target
lesion treatment;

20. Patient has perforated targeted vessel as evidenced by extravasation of contrast
media;

21. Patient has severe calcification that renders the lesion undilatable;

22. Current participation in another investigational drug or device clinical trial that
has not completed the primary endpoint at the time of randomization/enrollment or that
clinically interferes with the current trial endpoints.

Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s


Intervention assignment
Parallel
Other design features
Phase
Phase 3
Type of endpoint/s
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Data analysis
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [1] 0 0
Alabama
Country [2] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [2] 0 0
Colorado
Country [3] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [3] 0 0
Connecticut
Country [4] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [4] 0 0
Delaware
Country [5] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [5] 0 0
District of Columbia
Country [6] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [6] 0 0
Florida
Country [7] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [7] 0 0
Georgia
Country [8] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [8] 0 0
Hawaii
Country [9] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [9] 0 0
Indiana
Country [10] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [10] 0 0
Kentucky
Country [11] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [11] 0 0
Louisiana
Country [12] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [12] 0 0
Minnesota
Country [13] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [13] 0 0
New Jersey
Country [14] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [14] 0 0
New York
Country [15] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [15] 0 0
North Carolina
Country [16] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [16] 0 0
Ohio
Country [17] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [17] 0 0
Oregon
Country [18] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [18] 0 0
Pennsylvania
Country [19] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [19] 0 0
South Carolina
Country [20] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [20] 0 0
Tennessee
Country [21] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [21] 0 0
Texas
Country [22] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [22] 0 0
Utah
Country [23] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [23] 0 0
West Virginia
Country [24] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [24] 0 0
Wisconsin
Country [25] 0 0
Austria
State/province [25] 0 0
Graz
Country [26] 0 0
Austria
State/province [26] 0 0
Vienna
Country [27] 0 0
Belgium
State/province [27] 0 0
Genk
Country [28] 0 0
Belgium
State/province [28] 0 0
Gent
Country [29] 0 0
Belgium
State/province [29] 0 0
Tienen
Country [30] 0 0
Canada
State/province [30] 0 0
Alberta
Country [31] 0 0
Canada
State/province [31] 0 0
Ontario
Country [32] 0 0
Canada
State/province [32] 0 0
Quebec
Country [33] 0 0
Japan
State/province [33] 0 0
Fukuoka
Country [34] 0 0
Japan
State/province [34] 0 0
Fukushima
Country [35] 0 0
Japan
State/province [35] 0 0
Hokkaido
Country [36] 0 0
Japan
State/province [36] 0 0
Hyogo-ken
Country [37] 0 0
Japan
State/province [37] 0 0
Kanagawa
Country [38] 0 0
Japan
State/province [38] 0 0
Miyagi
Country [39] 0 0
Japan
State/province [39] 0 0
Osaka
Country [40] 0 0
Japan
State/province [40] 0 0
Saitama
Country [41] 0 0
Japan
State/province [41] 0 0
Tokyo
Country [42] 0 0
Japan
State/province [42] 0 0
Kyoto
Country [43] 0 0
New Zealand
State/province [43] 0 0
Auckland
Country [44] 0 0
New Zealand
State/province [44] 0 0
Hamilton
Country [45] 0 0
New Zealand
State/province [45] 0 0
Otahuhu

Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/Industry
Name
Boston Scientific Corporation
Address
Country

Ethics approval
Ethics application status

Summary
Brief summary
To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Rangerâ„¢ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon for
treating lesions located in the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal arteries
(SFA/PPA).

Long Balloon substudy: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Boston Scientific
Corporation (BSC) Rangerâ„¢ Paclitaxel Coated Balloon in the 120, 150 and 200 mm lengths for
treating Superficial Femoral Artery (SFA) and/or Proximal Popliteal Artery (PPA) lesions.
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03064126
Trial related presentations / publications
Litsky J, Chanda A, Stilp E, Lansky A, Mena C. Critical evaluation of stents in the peripheral arterial disease of the superficial femoral artery - focus on the paclitaxel eluting stent. Med Devices (Auckl). 2014 May 28;7:149-56. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S45472. eCollection 2014.
Kakkar AM, Abbott JD. Percutaneous versus surgical management of lower extremity peripheral artery disease. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2015;17(2):479. doi: 10.1007/s11883-014-0479-0.
Razavi MK, Mustapha JA, Miller LE. Contemporary systematic review and meta-analysis of early outcomes with percutaneous treatment for infrapopliteal atherosclerotic disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Oct;25(10):1489-96, 1496.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.06.018. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
Laird JR, Katzen BT, Scheinert D, Lammer J, Carpenter J, Buchbinder M, Dave R, Ansel G, Lansky A, Cristea E, Collins TJ, Goldstein J, Jaff MR; RESILIENT Investigators. Nitinol stent implantation versus balloon angioplasty for lesions in the superficial femoral artery and proximal popliteal artery: twelve-month results from the RESILIENT randomized trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jun 1;3(3):267-76. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.903468. Epub 2010 May 18.
Scheinert D, Duda S, Zeller T, Krankenberg H, Ricke J, Bosiers M, Tepe G, Naisbitt S, Rosenfield K. The LEVANT I (Lutonix paclitaxel-coated balloon for the prevention of femoropopliteal restenosis) trial for femoropopliteal revascularization: first-in-human randomized trial of low-dose drug-coated balloon versus uncoated balloon angioplasty. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):10-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.022.
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 0 0
Thomas Zeller, MD
Address 0 0
Universitaets-Herzzentrum
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for scientific queries



Summary Results

For IPD and results data, please see https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03064126