COVID-19 studies are our top priority. For all other trials, there is a 4-week delay in processing a trial submitted to the ANZCTR and additional delays for updates of registered trials. We appreciate your patience.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial details imported from

For full trial details, please see the original record at

Registration number
Ethics application status
Date submitted
Date registered
Date last updated

Titles & IDs
Public title
Angioplasty + SBCV vs. Angioplasty Alone for Femoropopliteal Artery Stenosis
Scientific title
A Multicenter, Parallel, Blinded, Randomized Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Balloon Angioplasty Plus Intraluminal SBCV To Balloon Angioplasty Alone for Treatment of Stenosis or Occlusion Within the Femoropopliteal Artery
Secondary ID [1] 0 0
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Peripheral Arterial Disease 0 0
Condition category
Condition code
Cardiovascular 0 0 0 0
Diseases of the vasculature and circulation including the lymphatic system

Study type
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Other interventions - SBCV
Other interventions - Saline

Experimental: SBCV - SBCV is administered to the site immediately post balloon dilation.

Placebo Comparator: Control - Saline is used as a control and is delivered immediately post balloon dilation.

Other interventions: SBCV
SBCV is a single use, sterile product that acts as a localized physical barrier at the vascular wall.

Other interventions: Saline
Saline is used as a control.

Intervention code [1] 0 0
Other interventions
Comparator / control treatment
Control group

Primary outcome [1] 0 0
Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events - The composite of no all-cause perioperative (=30 day) mortality and none of the following events at 24 weeks following treatment:
Index limb amputation (above or below the ankle)
Index limb re-intervention
Index-limb-related death
Timepoint [1] 0 0
through 24 weeks
Primary outcome [2] 0 0
Late Lumen Loss - LLL is defined as the difference between the minimum lumen diameter (MLD) immediately post-primary procedure and the MLD at follow-up as measured by an independent, blinded core lab.
Timepoint [2] 0 0
24 weeks

Key inclusion criteria
- Scheduled for balloon angioplasty for stenosis of femoropopliteal lesion(s)

- Rutherford Clinical Category 1-4 (claudication or critical limb ischemia)

- Lesions are =70% stenosis by visual estimate

- A patent inflow artery free from significant lesion

- At least one patent native outflow artery to the ankle
Minimum age
40 Years
Maximum age
No limit
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Key exclusion criteria
- History of haemorrhagic stroke within 3 months of screening

- History of myocardial infarction, thrombolysis or angina within 2 weeks of screening

- Renal failure or chronic kidney disease

- Severe calcification that renders the lesion undilatable

Study design
Purpose of the study
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s

The people assessing the outcomes
Intervention assignment
Other design features
Not Applicable
Type of endpoint(s)
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment status
Unknown status
Data analysis
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons
Date of first participant enrolment
Date of last participant enrolment
Date of last data collection
Sample size
Accrual to date
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Recruitment hospital [1] 0 0
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital - Melbourne
Recruitment hospital [2] 0 0
Royal North Shore Hospital - Sydney
Recruitment hospital [3] 0 0
Gold Coast University Hospital - Southport
Recruitment hospital [4] 0 0
Flinders Medical Center - Adelaide
Recruitment hospital [5] 0 0
Austin Health - Heidelberg
Recruitment hospital [6] 0 0
The Alfred Hospital - Melbourne
Recruitment hospital [7] 0 0
Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital - Perth
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 0 0
2050 - Melbourne
Recruitment postcode(s) [2] 0 0
2065 - Sydney
Recruitment postcode(s) [3] 0 0
4215 - Southport
Recruitment postcode(s) [4] 0 0
5043 - Adelaide
Recruitment postcode(s) [5] 0 0
3084 - Heidelberg
Recruitment postcode(s) [6] 0 0
3181 - Melbourne
Recruitment postcode(s) [7] 0 0
6009 - Perth
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 0 0
New Zealand
State/province [1] 0 0

Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/Industry
Symic Vascular
Other collaborator category [1] 0 0
Commercial sector/Industry
Name [1] 0 0
Symic Biomedical, Inc.
Address [1] 0 0
Country [1] 0 0

Ethics approval
Ethics application status

Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to compare balloon angioplasty plus SBCV against balloon
angioplasty alone for treatment of stenosis within the femoropopliteal artery.
Trial website
Trial related presentations / publications
Public notes

Principal investigator
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for scientific queries

Summary results
For IPD and results data, please see