Trial Review

The ANZCTR website is back online for trial registration and updates. We apologise for any inconvenience caused while the site was inactive.



Reset your password and enable multi-factor authentication (MFA)


For ANZCTR account holders: to help ensure the cyber safety of your account, you’ll need to reset your password and set-up multi-factor authentication (MFA) as per the instructions below.


  1. Go to the Login page, click ‘reset password’ and follow the instructions.
  2. Check your email for the link to set a new password.
  3. Create a new password that meets requirements. New passwords must include at least one lowercase letter, one uppercase letter, one number and one special character (e.g. !#$%&@).
  4. Return to the Login page and enter your new password. A verification code will be sent to your email.
  5. Check your email for the code and enter it on the Login page. If the code is entered incorrectly, you can re-enter the correct one or request a new one.

Learn more about MFA and its importance on the Australian Signals Directorate website.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov

For full trial details, please see the original record at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00069095




Registration number
NCT00069095
Ethics application status
Date submitted
15/09/2003
Date registered
18/09/2003
Date last updated
6/10/2016

Titles & IDs
Public title
A Study of Capecitabine (Xeloda) and Bevacizumab as a First-line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Scientific title
A 2x2 Factorial Randomized Phase III Study of Intermittent Oral Capecitabine in Combination With Intravenous Oxaliplatin (Q3W) ("XELOX") With/Without Intravenous Bevacizumab (Q3W) Versus Bolus and Continuous Infusion Fluorouracil/Intravenous Leucovorin With Intravenous Oxaliplatin (Q2W) ("FOLFOX-4") With/Without Intravenous Bevacizumab (Q2W) as First-line Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Secondary ID [1] 0 0
NO16966
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Colorectal Cancer 0 0
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer 0 0 0 0
Bowel - Back passage (rectum) or large bowel (colon)

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m^2
Treatment: Drugs - Capecitabine 1000 mg/m^2
Treatment: Drugs - Bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg
Treatment: Drugs - Placebo for bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg
Treatment: Drugs - Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m^2
Treatment: Drugs - Leucovorin 200 mg/m^2
Treatment: Drugs - Bevacizumab 5 mg/kg
Treatment: Drugs - Placebo for bevacizumab 5 mg/kg

Experimental: XELOX (oxaliplatin+capecitabine) - Patients in the 2-arm part of the study received oxaliplatin 130 mg/m\^2 intravenously (iv) on Day 1 of every 3 week cycle + capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 orally twice a day for the first 2 weeks of every 3 week cycle. Patients in the 4-arm part of the study received the same treatments plus placebo for bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg iv on Day 1 of every 3 week cycle.

Experimental: XELOX (oxaliplatin+capecitabine) + bevacizumab - Patients in the 4-arm part of the study received oxaliplatin 130 mg/m\^2 intravenously (iv) on Day 1 of every 3 week cycle + capecitabine 1000 mg/m\^2 orally twice a day for the first 2 weeks of every 3 week cycle + bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg iv on Day 1 of every 3 week cycle.

Active comparator: FOLFOX-4 (oxaliplatin+leucovorin+fluorouracil) - Patients in the 2-arm part of the study received oxaliplatin 85 mg/m\^2 intravenously (iv) + leucovorin 200 mg/m\^2 iv on Day 1 of every 2 week cycle + fluorouracil 400 mg/m\^2 bolus injection over 2 to 4 min followed by 600 mg/m\^2 continuous infusion over 22 h on Days 1 and 2 of every 2 week cycle. Patients in the 4-arm part of the study received the same treatments plus placebo for bevacizumab 5 mg/kg iv on Day 1 of every 2 week cycle.

Active comparator: FOLFOX-4 (oxaliplatin+leucovorin+fluorouracil) + bevacizumab - Patients in the 4-arm part of the study received oxaliplatin 85 mg/m\^2 intravenously (iv) + leucovorin 200 mg/m\^2 iv + bevacizumab 5 mg/kg iv on Day 1 of every 2 week cycle + fluorouracil 400 mg/m\^2 bolus injection over 2 to 4 min followed by 600 mg/m\^2 continuous infusion over 22 h on Days 1 and 2 of every 2 week cycle.


Treatment: Drugs: Oxaliplatin 130 mg/m^2
Oxaliplatin was administered in a 2 h infusion before the first dose of capecitabine.

Treatment: Drugs: Capecitabine 1000 mg/m^2
Capecitabine was taken within 30 min after the end of breakfast and dinner.

Treatment: Drugs: Bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg
Bevacizumab was administered in a 30 to 90 min infusion.

Treatment: Drugs: Placebo for bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg
Placebo control for bevacizumab (volume equivalent to 7.5 mg/kg bevacizumab) was administered in a 30 to 90 min infusion.

Treatment: Drugs: Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m^2
Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m\^2 was administered simultaneously with leucovorin in a 2 h infusion.

Treatment: Drugs: Leucovorin 200 mg/m^2
Leucovorin was administered simultaneously with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m\^2 in a 2 h infusion.

Treatment: Drugs: Bevacizumab 5 mg/kg
Bevacizumab was administered in a 30 to 90 min infusion.

Treatment: Drugs: Placebo for bevacizumab 5 mg/kg
Placebo control for bevacizumab (volume equivalent to 5 mg/kg bevacizumab) was administered in a 30 to 90 min infusion.
Intervention code [1] 0 0
Treatment: Drugs
Comparator / control treatment
Control group

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 0 0
Progression-free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) by General Approach (Participants With Curative Surgery Censored): Non-inferiority of XELOX Versus FOLFOX-4
Assessment method [1] 0 0
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to progressive disease or death. Participants with neither disease progression nor death were censored at the last date of the last tumor assessment that confirmed that their disease had not progressed. Participants with no tumor assessments after baseline who were alive at the time of clinical cutoff were censored at the date of randomization. Participants who underwent surgical resection with curative intent without prior progression were censored at the date of surgery. PFS was based on tumor assessments made by the investigators according to the RECIST criteria. Non-inferiority analysis that followed the general approach took into account all tumor assessments obtained during the primary study treatment phase, the post-study treatment phase and those obtained during the follow-up phase. Non-inferiority of the XELOX-containing arms compared with the FOLFOX-4- containing arms was investigated.
Timepoint [1] 0 0
Baseline until disease progression or death, approximately 2 years 6 months
Primary outcome [2] 0 0
PFS as Assessed by the Investigator According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) by General Approach (Participants With Curative Surgery Censored) - Superiority of Chemotherapy Plus BV Over Chemotherapy Alone
Assessment method [2] 0 0
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to progressive disease or death. Participants with neither disease progression nor death were censored at the last date of the last tumor assessment that confirmed that their disease had not progressed. Participants with no tumor assessments after baseline who were alive at the time of clinical cutoff were censored at the date of randomization. Participants who underwent surgical resection with curative intent without prior progression were censored at the date of surgery. PFS was based on tumor assessments made by the investigators according to the RECIST criteria. Superiority analysis that followed the general approach took into account all tumor assessments obtained during the primary study treatment phase, the post-study treatment phase and those obtained during the follow-up phase. Superiority of the BV-containing arms was compared with the chemotherapy alone arms.
Timepoint [2] 0 0
Baseline until disease progression or death, approximately 2 years 6 months
Secondary outcome [1] 0 0
PFS as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) (General Approach, Participants With Curative Surgery Censored) - Non-inferiority of XELOX Versus FOLFOX-4
Assessment method [1] 0 0
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause. Participants with neither disease progression nor death were censored at the last date of the last tumor assessment that confirmed that their disease had not progressed. Participants who underwent surgical resection with curative intent without prior progression were censored at the date of surgery. PFS was analyzed on the basis of the tumor response assessments made by the IRC. Non-inferiority analysis that followed the general approach took into account all tumor assessments obtained during the primary study treatment phase, the post-study treatment phase and those obtained during the follow-up phase. Non-inferiority of the XELOX-containing arms was compared with the FOLFOX-4-containing arms.
Timepoint [1] 0 0
Baseline until disease progression or death, approximately 2 years 6 months
Secondary outcome [2] 0 0
PFS as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) (General Approach, Participants With Curative Surgery Censored) - Superiority of Chemotherapy Plus BV Over Chemotherapy Alone
Assessment method [2] 0 0
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause. Participants with neither disease progression nor death were censored at the last date of the last tumor assessment that confirmed that their disease had not progressed. Participants who underwent surgical resection with curative intent without prior progression were censored at the date of surgery. PFS was analyzed on the basis of the tumor response assessments made by the IRC. Superiority analysis that followed the general approach took into account all tumor assessments obtained during the primary study treatment phase, the post-study treatment phase and those obtained during the follow-up phase. Superiority of the bevacizumab-containing arms was compared with the placebo-containing arms.
Timepoint [2] 0 0
Baseline until disease progression or death, approximately 2 years 6 months
Secondary outcome [3] 0 0
PFS (On-treatment Approach): Non-inferiority of XELOX Versus FOLFOX-4
Assessment method [3] 0 0
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause. The on-treatment analysis included only tumor assessments and death events that occurred no later than 28 days after the last confirmed intake of any study medication in the primary study treatment phase. Participants who did not have an event during this interval were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment within this time window, or on day 1 if no tumor assessment was available after baseline. Participants who underwent surgical resection with curative intent without prior progression within 28 days after the last confirmed intake of any study medication in the primary study treatment phase were censored at the date of surgery. The on-treatment approach excluded the possible impact of other treatments that might have been started before disease progression. Non-inferiority of the XELOX-containing arms was compared with the FOLFOX-4-containing arms.
Timepoint [3] 0 0
Baseline until disease progression or death, approximately 2 years 6 months
Secondary outcome [4] 0 0
PFS (On-treatment Approach): Superiority of Chemotherapy Plus BV Over Chemotherapy Alone
Assessment method [4] 0 0
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause. The on-treatment analysis included only tumor assessments and death events that occurred no later than 28 days after the last confirmed intake of any study medication in the primary study treatment phase. Participants who did not have an event during this interval were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment within this time window, or on day 1 if no tumor assessment was available after baseline. Participants who underwent surgical resection with curative intent without prior progression within 28 days after the last confirmed intake of any study medication in the primary study treatment phase were censored at the date of surgery. The on-treatment approach excluded the possible impact of other treatments that might have been started before disease progression. Non-inferiority of the XELOX-containing arms was compared with the FOLFOX-4-containing arms.
Timepoint [4] 0 0
Baseline until disease progression or death, approximately 2 years 6 months
Secondary outcome [5] 0 0
PFS by General Approach, Participants With Curative Surgery Not Censored: Non-inferiority of XELOX Versus FOLFOX-4
Assessment method [5] 0 0
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause. Participants who underwent curative surgery after experiencing a sufficient shrinkage of their tumor were not censored at the date of surgery, but any relapse, new occurrence of colorectal cancer, or death was considered as an event. Non-inferiority analysis that followed the general approach took into account all tumor assessments obtained during the primary study treatment phase, the post-study treatment phase and those obtained during the follow-up phase. Non-inferiority of the XELOX-containing arms was compared with the FOLFOX-4-containing arms.
Timepoint [5] 0 0
Baseline until disease progression or death, approximately 2 years 6 months
Secondary outcome [6] 0 0
PFS by General Approach, Participants With Curative Surgery Not Censored: Superiority of Chemotherapy Plus BV Over Chemotherapy Alone
Assessment method [6] 0 0
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause. Participants who underwent curative surgery after experiencing a sufficient shrinkage of their tumor were not censored at the date of surgery, but any relapse, new occurrence of colorectal cancer, or death was considered as an event. Superiority analysis that followed the general approach took into account all tumor assessments obtained during the primary study treatment phase, the post-study treatment phase and those obtained during the follow-up phase. Superiority of the BV-containing arms was compared with the chemotherapy alone arms.
Timepoint [6] 0 0
Baseline until disease progression or death, approximately 2 years 6 months
Secondary outcome [7] 0 0
Overall Survival: Non-inferiority of XELOX Versus FOLFOX-4
Assessment method [7] 0 0
Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. Participants who were not reported to have died at the time of the clinical cut-off date for the analysis were censored using the date they were last known to be alive. Non-inferiority of the XELOX-containing arms was compared with the FOLFOX-4-containing arms.
Timepoint [7] 0 0
Baseline until disease progression or death, approximately 2 years 6 months
Secondary outcome [8] 0 0
Overall Survival: Superiority of Chemotherapy Plus BV Over Chemotherapy Alone
Assessment method [8] 0 0
Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. Participants who were not reported to have died at the time of the clinical cut-off date for the analysis were censored using the date they were last known to be alive. Superiority of the BV-containing arms was compared with the chemotherapy alone arms.
Timepoint [8] 0 0
Baseline until disease progression or death, approximately 2 years 6 months
Secondary outcome [9] 0 0
Best Overall Response (BOR) as Assessed by the Investigator According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST): Non-inferiority of XELOX Versus FOLFOX-4
Assessment method [9] 0 0
According to the RECIST criteria, BOR in an individual participant was defined as the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until disease progression or recurrence. Only tumor assessments as assessed by the investigator and made up to and including 28 days after last intake of study medication in the primary study treatment phase not later than date of first curative surgery were included in these analyses. Responders were defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Non-inferiority of the XELOX-containing arms was compared with the FOLFOX-4-containing arms.
Timepoint [9] 0 0
From baseline until disease progression/recurrence, approximately 2 years 6 months
Secondary outcome [10] 0 0
Best Overall Response (BOR) as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST: Superiority of Chemotherapy Plus BV Over Chemotherapy Alone
Assessment method [10] 0 0
According to the RECIST criteria, BOR in an individual participant was defined as the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until disease progression or recurrence. Only tumor assessments as assessed by the investigator and made up to and including 28 days after last intake of study medication in the primary study treatment phase not later than date of first curative surgery were included in these analyses. Responders were defined as the percentage of participants with a confirmed best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Superiority of the BV-containing arms was compared with the chemotherapy alone arms.
Timepoint [10] 0 0
From baseline until disease progression/recurrence, approximately 2 years 6 months
Secondary outcome [11] 0 0
BOR as Assessed by the IRC According to RECIST: Non-inferiority of XELOX Versus FOLFOX-4
Assessment method [11] 0 0
According to the RECIST criteria, the BOR in an individual participant was the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until disease progression/recurrence (taking the smallest measurements recorded since the baseline assessment as a reference for PD). The BOR as assessed by the IRC was determined based on tumor assessments that were made up to and including 28 days after last intake of study medication in the primary study treatment phase. Responders were defined as the percentage of participants with a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Non-inferiority of the XELOX-containing arms was compared with the FOLFOX-4-containing arms.
Timepoint [11] 0 0
From baseline until disease progression/recurrence, approximately 2 years 6 months
Secondary outcome [12] 0 0
BOR as Assessed by the IRC According to RECIST: Superiority of Chemotherapy Plus BV Over Chemotherapy Alone
Assessment method [12] 0 0
According to the RECIST criteria, the BOR in an individual participant was the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until disease progression/recurrence (taking the smallest measurements recorded since the baseline assessment as a reference for PD). The BOR as assessed by the IRC was determined based on tumor assessments that were made up to and including 28 days after last intake of study medication in the primary study treatment phase. Responders were defined as the percentage of participants with a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Superiority of the BV-containing arms was compared with the chemotherapy alone arms.
Timepoint [12] 0 0
From baseline until disease progression/recurrence, approximately 2 years 6 months
Secondary outcome [13] 0 0
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST: Non-inferiority of XELOX Versus FOLFOX-4
Assessment method [13] 0 0
Time to treatment failure was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of discontinuation of the primary study treatment phase due to adverse event/intercurrent illness, insufficient therapeutic response, death, failure to return, refusing treatment/being unwilling to cooperate, or withdrawing consent; discontinuation of the post study treatment phase due to adverse event, progressive disease, death, participant refusal/administrative reasons, or withdrawing consent; documented disease progression; or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. The general approach took into account all tumor assessments obtained during the primary study treatment phase, the post-study treatment phase and those obtained during the follow-up phase.The on-treatment approach included only tumor assessments and deaths that occurred no later than 28 days after the last confirmed intake of any study medication in the primary study treatment phase only.
Timepoint [13] 0 0
From baseline until disease progression/recurrence, approximately 2 years 6 months
Secondary outcome [14] 0 0
Time to Treatment Failure as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST: Superiority of Chemotherapy Plus BV Over Chemotherapy Alone
Assessment method [14] 0 0
Time to treatment failure was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of discontinuation of the primary study treatment phase due to adverse event/intercurrent illness, insufficient therapeutic response, death, failure to return, refusing treatment/being unwilling to cooperate, or withdrawing consent; discontinuation of the post study treatment phase due to adverse event, progressive disease, death, participant refusal/administrative reasons, or withdrawing consent; documented disease progression; or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. The general approach included all tumor assessments or deaths that occurred during the primary study treatment phase, the post-study treatment phase, or the follow-up phase. The on-treatment approach included only tumor assessments and deaths that occurred no later than 28 days after the last confirmed intake of any study medication in the primary study treatment phase only.
Timepoint [14] 0 0
From baseline until disease progression/recurrence, approximately 2 years 6 months
Secondary outcome [15] 0 0
Time to Response as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST: Non-inferiority of XELOX Versus FOLFOX-4
Assessment method [15] 0 0
For participants whose BOR was CR or PR, time to response was measured as the time from randomization to the first time when the measurement criteria for CR or PR (whichever status was recorded first) was met. It was based on tumor assessments made by the investigators according to the RECIST criteria. Results were reported as the number of participants achieving a response in 8 time categories from Week 1 to Week 54. Non-inferiority of the XELOX-containing arms was compared with the FOLFOX-4-containing arms.
Timepoint [15] 0 0
Week 1 to Week 54
Secondary outcome [16] 0 0
Time to Response as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST: Superiority of Chemotherapy Plus BV Over Chemotherapy Alone
Assessment method [16] 0 0
For participants whose BOR was CR or PR, time to response was measured as the time from randomization to the first time when the measurement criteria for CR or PR (whichever status was recorded first) was met. It was based on tumor assessments made by the investigators according to the RECIST criteria. Results were reported as the number of participants achieving a response in 8 time categories from Week 1 to Week 54. Superiority of the BV-containing arms was compared with the chemotherapy alone arms.
Timepoint [16] 0 0
Week 1 to Week 54
Secondary outcome [17] 0 0
Duration of Overall Response as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST: Non-inferiority of XELOX Versus FOLFOX-4
Assessment method [17] 0 0
Duration of overall response was measured from the time that measurement criteria were first met for CR or PR (whichever status was recorded first) until the first date when progressive disease or death was documented. It was based on tumor assessments made by the investigators according to the RECIST criteria. Participants who neither progressed nor died were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment. Participants undergoing surgical resection with curative intent were censored at the date of surgery. Non-inferiority of the XELOX-containing arms was compared with the FOLFOX-4-containing arms.
Timepoint [17] 0 0
From baseline until disease progression/recurrence, approximately 2 years 6 months
Secondary outcome [18] 0 0
Duration of Overall Response as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST: Superiority Analysis of Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab Versus Chemotherapy Alone
Assessment method [18] 0 0
Duration of overall response was measured from the time that measurement criteria were first met for CR or PR (whichever status was recorded first) until the first date when progressive disease or death was documented. It was based on tumor assessments made by the investigators according to the RECIST criteria. Participants who neither progressed nor died were censored at the date of the last tumor assessment. Participants undergoing surgical resection with curative intent were censored at the date of surgery. Superiority of the BV-containing arms was compared with the chemotherapy alone arms.
Timepoint [18] 0 0
From baseline until disease progression/recurrence, approximately 2 years 6 months
Secondary outcome [19] 0 0
Duration of Complete Response as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST: Non-inferiority of XELOX Versus FOLFOX-4
Assessment method [19] 0 0
For complete responders, the duration of complete response was measured from the time measurement criteria were first met for complete response until the date that progressive disease (or death) was documented. Non-inferiority of the XELOX-containing arms was compared with the FOLFOX-4-containing arms.
Timepoint [19] 0 0
From baseline until disease progression/recurrence, approximately 2 years 6 months
Secondary outcome [20] 0 0
Duration of Complete Response as Assessed by the Investigator According to RECIST: Superiority of Chemotherapy Plus BV Over Chemotherapy Alone
Assessment method [20] 0 0
For complete responders, the duration of complete response was measured from the time measurement criteria were first met for complete response until the date that progressive disease (or death) was documented. Superiority of the BV-containing arms was compared with the chemotherapy alone arms.
Timepoint [20] 0 0
From baseline until disease progression/recurrence, approximately 2 years 6 months

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Adult patients = 18 years of age.
* Metastatic colorectal cancer.
* = 1 target lesion.
Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
No limit
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
* Previous treatment with oxaliplatin or bevacizumab.
* Previous systemic chemotherapy or immunotherapy for advanced or metastatic disease.
* Progressive disease during or within 6 months of completion of previous adjuvant therapy.

Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s


The people analysing the results/data
Intervention assignment
Factorial
Other design features
Phase
Phase 3
Type of endpoint/s
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Data analysis
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
1/07/2003
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
1/04/2009
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
2035
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Recruitment hospital [1] 0 0
- Adelaide
Recruitment hospital [2] 0 0
- Box Hill
Recruitment hospital [3] 0 0
- Brisbane
Recruitment hospital [4] 0 0
- Camperdown
Recruitment hospital [5] 0 0
- Fitzroy
Recruitment hospital [6] 0 0
- Footscray
Recruitment hospital [7] 0 0
- Kurralta Park
Recruitment hospital [8] 0 0
- Malvern
Recruitment hospital [9] 0 0
- Melbourne
Recruitment hospital [10] 0 0
- Perth
Recruitment hospital [11] 0 0
- Port Macquarie
Recruitment hospital [12] 0 0
- St. Leonards
Recruitment hospital [13] 0 0
- Sydney
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 0 0
5011 - Adelaide
Recruitment postcode(s) [2] 0 0
3128 - Box Hill
Recruitment postcode(s) [3] 0 0
4101 - Brisbane
Recruitment postcode(s) [4] 0 0
2050 - Camperdown
Recruitment postcode(s) [5] 0 0
3065 - Fitzroy
Recruitment postcode(s) [6] 0 0
3011 - Footscray
Recruitment postcode(s) [7] 0 0
5037 - Kurralta Park
Recruitment postcode(s) [8] 0 0
3144 - Malvern
Recruitment postcode(s) [9] 0 0
3002 - Melbourne
Recruitment postcode(s) [10] 0 0
3181 - Melbourne
Recruitment postcode(s) [11] 0 0
6000 - Perth
Recruitment postcode(s) [12] 0 0
2444 - Port Macquarie
Recruitment postcode(s) [13] 0 0
2065 - St. Leonards
Recruitment postcode(s) [14] 0 0
2031 - Sydney
Recruitment postcode(s) [15] 0 0
2139 - Sydney
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [1] 0 0
California
Country [2] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [2] 0 0
Connecticut
Country [3] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [3] 0 0
Florida
Country [4] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [4] 0 0
Georgia
Country [5] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [5] 0 0
Illinois
Country [6] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [6] 0 0
Kentucky
Country [7] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [7] 0 0
Louisiana
Country [8] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [8] 0 0
Maine
Country [9] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [9] 0 0
Massachusetts
Country [10] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [10] 0 0
Michigan
Country [11] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [11] 0 0
Minnesota
Country [12] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [12] 0 0
Nevada
Country [13] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [13] 0 0
New Jersey
Country [14] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [14] 0 0
New Mexico
Country [15] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [15] 0 0
New York
Country [16] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [16] 0 0
North Carolina
Country [17] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [17] 0 0
North Dakota
Country [18] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [18] 0 0
Pennsylvania
Country [19] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [19] 0 0
Rhode Island
Country [20] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [20] 0 0
South Carolina
Country [21] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [21] 0 0
Tennessee
Country [22] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [22] 0 0
Texas
Country [23] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [23] 0 0
Vermont
Country [24] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [24] 0 0
Virginia
Country [25] 0 0
Austria
State/province [25] 0 0
Wels
Country [26] 0 0
Austria
State/province [26] 0 0
Wien
Country [27] 0 0
Brazil
State/province [27] 0 0
JAÚ
Country [28] 0 0
Brazil
State/province [28] 0 0
Rio de Janeiro
Country [29] 0 0
Brazil
State/province [29] 0 0
Sao Paulo
Country [30] 0 0
Canada
State/province [30] 0 0
Alberta
Country [31] 0 0
Canada
State/province [31] 0 0
British Columbia
Country [32] 0 0
Canada
State/province [32] 0 0
Manitoba
Country [33] 0 0
Canada
State/province [33] 0 0
Nova Scotia
Country [34] 0 0
Canada
State/province [34] 0 0
Ontario
Country [35] 0 0
Canada
State/province [35] 0 0
Quebec
Country [36] 0 0
China
State/province [36] 0 0
Beijing
Country [37] 0 0
China
State/province [37] 0 0
Guangdong
Country [38] 0 0
China
State/province [38] 0 0
Guangzhou
Country [39] 0 0
China
State/province [39] 0 0
Jiangsu
Country [40] 0 0
China
State/province [40] 0 0
Jiangxi
Country [41] 0 0
China
State/province [41] 0 0
Shandong
Country [42] 0 0
China
State/province [42] 0 0
Shanghai
Country [43] 0 0
China
State/province [43] 0 0
Tianjin
Country [44] 0 0
China
State/province [44] 0 0
Wuhan
Country [45] 0 0
Czech Republic
State/province [45] 0 0
Brno
Country [46] 0 0
Czech Republic
State/province [46] 0 0
Chomutov
Country [47] 0 0
Czech Republic
State/province [47] 0 0
Hradec Kralove
Country [48] 0 0
Czech Republic
State/province [48] 0 0
Ostrava
Country [49] 0 0
Denmark
State/province [49] 0 0
Herlev
Country [50] 0 0
Denmark
State/province [50] 0 0
København
Country [51] 0 0
Denmark
State/province [51] 0 0
Odense
Country [52] 0 0
Finland
State/province [52] 0 0
Helsinki
Country [53] 0 0
Finland
State/province [53] 0 0
Tampere
Country [54] 0 0
Finland
State/province [54] 0 0
Turku
Country [55] 0 0
France
State/province [55] 0 0
Besancon
Country [56] 0 0
France
State/province [56] 0 0
Bobigny
Country [57] 0 0
France
State/province [57] 0 0
Boulogne-billancourt
Country [58] 0 0
France
State/province [58] 0 0
Brest
Country [59] 0 0
France
State/province [59] 0 0
Chambray Les Tours
Country [60] 0 0
France
State/province [60] 0 0
Colmar
Country [61] 0 0
France
State/province [61] 0 0
Dijon
Country [62] 0 0
France
State/province [62] 0 0
Grenoble
Country [63] 0 0
France
State/province [63] 0 0
Lyon
Country [64] 0 0
France
State/province [64] 0 0
Metz
Country [65] 0 0
France
State/province [65] 0 0
Nice
Country [66] 0 0
France
State/province [66] 0 0
Nimes
Country [67] 0 0
France
State/province [67] 0 0
Paris
Country [68] 0 0
France
State/province [68] 0 0
Pierre Benite
Country [69] 0 0
France
State/province [69] 0 0
Rouen
Country [70] 0 0
France
State/province [70] 0 0
Saint Herblain
Country [71] 0 0
France
State/province [71] 0 0
Toulouse
Country [72] 0 0
Germany
State/province [72] 0 0
Bochum
Country [73] 0 0
Germany
State/province [73] 0 0
Halle
Country [74] 0 0
Germany
State/province [74] 0 0
Hannover
Country [75] 0 0
Germany
State/province [75] 0 0
Herne
Country [76] 0 0
Germany
State/province [76] 0 0
Leipzig
Country [77] 0 0
Germany
State/province [77] 0 0
Mainz
Country [78] 0 0
Germany
State/province [78] 0 0
Mannheim
Country [79] 0 0
Germany
State/province [79] 0 0
Regensburg
Country [80] 0 0
Germany
State/province [80] 0 0
Stralsund
Country [81] 0 0
Germany
State/province [81] 0 0
Trier
Country [82] 0 0
Guatemala
State/province [82] 0 0
Guatemala City
Country [83] 0 0
Guatemala
State/province [83] 0 0
Guatemala
Country [84] 0 0
Hong Kong
State/province [84] 0 0
Hong Kong
Country [85] 0 0
Hungary
State/province [85] 0 0
Budapest
Country [86] 0 0
Hungary
State/province [86] 0 0
Gyor
Country [87] 0 0
Hungary
State/province [87] 0 0
Kecskemet
Country [88] 0 0
Ireland
State/province [88] 0 0
Cork
Country [89] 0 0
Ireland
State/province [89] 0 0
Dublin
Country [90] 0 0
Ireland
State/province [90] 0 0
Galway
Country [91] 0 0
Israel
State/province [91] 0 0
Haifa
Country [92] 0 0
Israel
State/province [92] 0 0
Jerusalem
Country [93] 0 0
Israel
State/province [93] 0 0
Petach Tikva
Country [94] 0 0
Israel
State/province [94] 0 0
Tel Aviv
Country [95] 0 0
Israel
State/province [95] 0 0
Zerifin
Country [96] 0 0
Italy
State/province [96] 0 0
Ancona
Country [97] 0 0
Italy
State/province [97] 0 0
Genova
Country [98] 0 0
Italy
State/province [98] 0 0
Modena
Country [99] 0 0
Italy
State/province [99] 0 0
Padova
Country [100] 0 0
Italy
State/province [100] 0 0
Parma
Country [101] 0 0
Italy
State/province [101] 0 0
Pavia
Country [102] 0 0
Italy
State/province [102] 0 0
Reggio Emilia
Country [103] 0 0
Italy
State/province [103] 0 0
Sassari
Country [104] 0 0
Korea, Republic of
State/province [104] 0 0
Seoul
Country [105] 0 0
Mexico
State/province [105] 0 0
Mexico City
Country [106] 0 0
New Zealand
State/province [106] 0 0
Christchurch
Country [107] 0 0
Norway
State/province [107] 0 0
Bergen
Country [108] 0 0
Norway
State/province [108] 0 0
Oslo
Country [109] 0 0
Norway
State/province [109] 0 0
Tromsø
Country [110] 0 0
Panama
State/province [110] 0 0
Panama City
Country [111] 0 0
Portugal
State/province [111] 0 0
Beja
Country [112] 0 0
Portugal
State/province [112] 0 0
Lisboa
Country [113] 0 0
Puerto Rico
State/province [113] 0 0
San Juan
Country [114] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [114] 0 0
Moscow
Country [115] 0 0
Russian Federation
State/province [115] 0 0
St Petersburg
Country [116] 0 0
South Africa
State/province [116] 0 0
Cape Town
Country [117] 0 0
South Africa
State/province [117] 0 0
Pretoria
Country [118] 0 0
South Africa
State/province [118] 0 0
Sandton
Country [119] 0 0
Spain
State/province [119] 0 0
Barcelona
Country [120] 0 0
Spain
State/province [120] 0 0
Córdoba
Country [121] 0 0
Spain
State/province [121] 0 0
Granada
Country [122] 0 0
Spain
State/province [122] 0 0
Leganes
Country [123] 0 0
Spain
State/province [123] 0 0
Madrid
Country [124] 0 0
Spain
State/province [124] 0 0
Málaga
Country [125] 0 0
Spain
State/province [125] 0 0
Santander
Country [126] 0 0
Spain
State/province [126] 0 0
Valencia
Country [127] 0 0
Spain
State/province [127] 0 0
Zaragoza
Country [128] 0 0
Sweden
State/province [128] 0 0
Gaevle
Country [129] 0 0
Sweden
State/province [129] 0 0
Karlstad
Country [130] 0 0
Sweden
State/province [130] 0 0
Stockholm
Country [131] 0 0
Sweden
State/province [131] 0 0
Uppsala
Country [132] 0 0
Sweden
State/province [132] 0 0
Västerås
Country [133] 0 0
Switzerland
State/province [133] 0 0
Bern
Country [134] 0 0
Switzerland
State/province [134] 0 0
Geneve
Country [135] 0 0
Taiwan
State/province [135] 0 0
Kueishan
Country [136] 0 0
Taiwan
State/province [136] 0 0
Taipei
Country [137] 0 0
Thailand
State/province [137] 0 0
Bangkok
Country [138] 0 0
Thailand
State/province [138] 0 0
Khon Kaen
Country [139] 0 0
Turkey
State/province [139] 0 0
Istanbul
Country [140] 0 0
Turkey
State/province [140] 0 0
Izmir
Country [141] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [141] 0 0
Aberdeen
Country [142] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [142] 0 0
Birmingham
Country [143] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [143] 0 0
Cardiff
Country [144] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [144] 0 0
Derby
Country [145] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [145] 0 0
Glasgow
Country [146] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [146] 0 0
Guildford
Country [147] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [147] 0 0
Hull
Country [148] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [148] 0 0
London
Country [149] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [149] 0 0
Maidstone
Country [150] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [150] 0 0
Newcastle Upon Tyne
Country [151] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [151] 0 0
Northwood
Country [152] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [152] 0 0
Nottingham
Country [153] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [153] 0 0
Plymouth
Country [154] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [154] 0 0
Salisbury
Country [155] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [155] 0 0
Southampton
Country [156] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [156] 0 0
Sutton
Country [157] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [157] 0 0
Taunton

Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Name
Hoffmann-La Roche
Country

Ethics approval
Ethics application status

Summary
Brief summary
Trial website
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 0 0
Clinical Trials
Address 0 0
Hoffmann-La Roche
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for scientific queries

No information has been provided regarding IPD availability


What supporting documents are/will be available?

No Supporting Document Provided



Results publications and other study-related documents

No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.

Results are available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00069095