Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
A database of clinical trials and their results from Australia, New Zealand, and other countries.
account_circle
Log in
to register or update your trial
search
Search for trials
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12625000937415
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
17/02/2025
Date registered
29/08/2025
Date last updated
29/08/2025
Date data sharing statement initially provided
29/08/2025
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Evaluation of wearable E-Tattoo sensors for measuring muscle activity.
Query!
Scientific title
Evaluation of wearable integrated Electronic Tattoo (E-Tattoo) sensors for measuring muscle activity in stroke survivors with upper or lower limb spasticity.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
313982
0
Nil
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1319-1335
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
stroke
336703
0
Query!
traumatic brain injury
336704
0
Query!
multiple sclerosis
336705
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Stroke
333202
333202
0
0
Query!
Ischaemic
Query!
Stroke
333203
333203
0
0
Query!
Haemorrhagic
Query!
Neurological
333204
333204
0
0
Query!
Multiple sclerosis
Query!
Neurological
333205
333205
0
0
Query!
Other neurological disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
At each appointment in the Spasticity Clinic, participants will be assessed as indicated below. The first appointment will be a baseline session, with a follow up session at the second appointment 6 weeks later.
Spasticity in the relevant muscle(s) will be measured using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). This test is part of the standard assessment conducted by rehabilitation consultants in the Spasticity Clinic.
At the first and follow-up appointments in the Spasticity Clinic, the E-Tattoo electrodes will be applied by the physiotherapist to the skin overlying the spastic muscles and their antagonists. In the upper limb these will be the biceps (elbow flexor) and triceps (elbow extensor) muscles; in the lower limb, these will be the gastrocnemius, soleus (plantarflexors) and tibialis anterior (dorsiflexor) muscles. The electrodes will be worn for the duration of the Clinic appointment and during the relevant functional tests, and then removed before the participant leaves the Clinic.
Raw sEMG signals will be collected via a myRIO data acquisition system (National Instruments, Texas, US) at a sampling rate of 2000Hz. The data will be transferred to a computer for further processing. This includes signal processing, data segmentation, feature extraction, and classification, followed by pattern recognition to analyse muscle activity. The signal will be filtered using a bandpass filter between 20Hz and 450Hz. Additionally, a band-stop filter in the range of 49-51 Hz will be used to mitigate electrical and power frequency noise.
The functional tests will take approximately 30 minutes to complete.
Lower limb tasks: While wearing the sEMG electrodes, participants with lower limb spasticity will be assessed on the following tasks:
• Walking. Participants will wear research-grade APDM inertial sensors (APDM Inc. Portland OR) attached by straps to their sternum, sacrum and limbs and will walk a minimum of 100 metres along a corridor near the Clinic, using their usual gait aid, if required, to obtain spatiotemporal measures and kinematics of gait. Participants will be asked to walk without an ankle-foot orthosis if they normally wear one. Signals from the accelerometer on the sternum will be used to derive non-linear measures of gait, including the local divergence exponent (LDE), a measure of gait stability which has been shown by our group to be a much more sensitive measure of walking disability than traditional spatiotemporal measures.
• Timed Up and Go (TUG) test Participants will be asked to stand up from sitting on a chair, walk 3 metres, turn around, and walk back to sit on the chair. The task will be timed using a stopwatch.
• 5 times Sit-to-Stand (5xSTS): Participants will be asked to complete five consecutive sit-to-stand movements from a seated position. The task will be timed using a stopwatch.
Upper limb tasks: While wearing the sEMG electrodes, participants with upper limb spasticity will be assessed on the following tasks:
• Upper limb coordination task. Participants will have their arm fully supported on a table with their forearm resting on a sheepskin pad, with an accelerometer attached to the wrist. They will be asked to bend and straighten their elbow at a self-selected speed and also as fast as they can.
• 9-hole peg test (9HPT). The 9HPT is a brief, timed, standardised, quantitative test of finger dexterity. Participants will pick up pegs one by one from the container and place them in the empty holes in a board.
• Moving cones. Participants will be asked to grasp a cone from the table in front of them and move it forward as far as possible on the table. They will then return the cone to the starting position, and repeat this task another nine times. The test will be timed.
A semi-structured interview will be conducted with each participant immediately after each assessment timepoint to obtain information about their perceptions about the integrated E-Tattoo system. The interview will take 20 minutes.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
330567
0
Diagnosis / Prognosis
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
No control group.
Query!
Control group
Uncontrolled
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
340767
0
Coactivation Index between spastic muscles and their antagonists
Query!
Assessment method [1]
340767
0
Surface electromyography using E-Tattoos
Query!
Timepoint [1]
340767
0
Baseline and 6 weeks follow-up
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
340771
0
Participant perceptions of the integrated E-Tattoo system
Query!
Assessment method [2]
340771
0
Semi-structured interview
Query!
Timepoint [2]
340771
0
Baseline and 6 weeks follow-up
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
445042
0
Spasticity
Query!
Assessment method [1]
445042
0
Modified Ashworth Scale
Query!
Timepoint [1]
445042
0
Baseline and 6 weeks follow-up.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
445043
0
Gait stability in ambulant participants
Query!
Assessment method [2]
445043
0
Local divergence exponent measured by Inertial sensors worn on the trunk during walking
Query!
Timepoint [2]
445043
0
Baseline and 6 weeks follow-up
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
445044
0
Balance/mobility in ambulant participants
Query!
Assessment method [3]
445044
0
Timed Up-and-Go Test
Query!
Timepoint [3]
445044
0
Baseline and 6 weeks follow-up.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
445045
0
Lower limb muscle power
Query!
Assessment method [4]
445045
0
5 times Sit=to-Stand
Query!
Timepoint [4]
445045
0
Baseline and 6 weeks follow-up.
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
445046
0
Finger dexterity in participants with upper limb spasticity
Query!
Assessment method [5]
445046
0
9-Hole Peg test
Query!
Timepoint [5]
445046
0
Baseline and 6 weeks follow-up.
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
445047
0
Arm dexterity in participants with upper limb spasticity
Query!
Assessment method [6]
445047
0
Participants will be timed while moving a cone as far forward as possible on a table and returning it to the starting position 10 times.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
445047
0
Baseline and 6 weeks follow-up.
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
450510
0
EMG characteristics at rest and during task performance
Query!
Assessment method [7]
450510
0
Time- and frequency-domain features of the sEMG signals [root mean square (RMS), average rectified activation amplitude and power spectrum will be analysed as a composite secondary outcome.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
450510
0
Baseline and 6 weeks follow-up.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
• 18 years or over;
• Upper or lower limb spasticity (predominantly one or the other);
• The ability to walk 100 metres with or without a gait aid in participants with predominantly lower limb spasticity;
• Newly referred to the Spasticity Clinic at The Royal Park Rehabilitation Centre;
• Able to perform at least one of the functional tasks.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
• Unable to provide informed consent;
• Unable to follow instructions.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Diagnosis
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Single group
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
If participant numbers permit, paired t-tests in each subgroup (upper limb or lower limb spasticity) will be used to examine differences in:
• Time- and frequency-domain features of the sEMG signals [root mean square (RMS), average rectified activation amplitude and power spectrum] during the specific physical tasks and at rest, and between baseline and follow-up.
• The muscle coactivation index (COI) between elbow flexors and extensors or ankle plantarflexors and dorsiflexors (whichever is relevant) between baseline and follow-up.
Spearman correlation coefficients will be calculated to evaluate the correlation between sEMG variables, MAS score, and performance on the physical tests (LDE, TUG and 5xSTS for those with lower limb spasticity and the 9HPT and Cones for those with upper limb spasticity) at each timepoint.
Interviews will be recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis will be conducted to identify and classify themes emerging from the interviews.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
10/11/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
20
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
43825
0
3052 - Parkville
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
318484
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
318484
0
The University of Melbourne
Query!
Address [1]
318484
0
Query!
Country [1]
318484
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
The University of Melbourne
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
320877
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
320877
0
Query!
Address [1]
320877
0
Query!
Country [1]
320877
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
317093
0
Royal Melbourne Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
317093
0
https://www.thermh.org.au/research/office-for-research
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
317093
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
317093
0
26/03/2025
Query!
Approval date [1]
317093
0
16/06/2025
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
317093
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
In this project, we will explore the clinical utility of novel integrated E-Tattoo surface EMG sensors by measuring the activity of spastic muscles in the arm or leg at a participant’s first and follow-up appointments at the Spasticity Clinic at the Royal Park Rehabilitation Centre. Electrodes will be placed over the overactive muscle and its opposing muscle and the data about the activity of each muscle during some tests of physical function. Participants will be asked about their experience of wearing the E-Tattoo electrodes. The project explores the application of E-Tattoo electrodes for the first time in the measurement of spasticity, as an example of their potential use for personalized health care. We hypothesis that these electrodes will be comfortable for participants to wear and will provide data on muscle activity comparable to that obtained from traditional electrodes.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
139974
0
Prof Mary Galea
Query!
Address
139974
0
Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010,
Query!
Country
139974
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
139974
0
+61 3 83441947
Query!
Fax
139974
0
Query!
Email
139974
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
139975
0
Mary Galea
Query!
Address
139975
0
Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010,
Query!
Country
139975
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
139975
0
+61 3 83441947
Query!
Fax
139975
0
Query!
Email
139975
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
139976
0
Mary Galea
Query!
Address
139976
0
Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, Victoria 3010,
Query!
Country
139976
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
139976
0
+61 3 83441947
Query!
Fax
139976
0
Query!
Email
139976
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will the study consider sharing individual participant data?
Yes
Will there be any conditions when requesting access to individual participant data?
Persons/groups eligible to request access:
•
Other researchers on request
Conditions for requesting access:
•
Yes, conditions apply:
•
Requires review on a case-by-case basis by the trial custodian, sponsor or data sharing committee
What individual participant data might be shared?
•
Deidentified research data underlying the published results
What types of analyses could be done with individual participant data?
•
Studies testing whether findings can be repeated or confirmed
When can requests for individual participant data be made (start and end dates)?
From:
After study completion
To:
Not yet decided
Where can requests to access individual participant data be made, or data be obtained directly?
•
Data will be maintained in a secure figshare repository, and may be accessed by contacting the Principal Investigator.:
[email protected]
Are there extra considerations when requesting access to individual participant data?
No
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF