Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
A database of clinical trials and their results from Australia, New Zealand, and other countries.
account_circle
Log in
to register or update your trial
search
Search for trials
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12624001408572
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
13/10/2024
Date registered
28/11/2024
Date last updated
20/07/2025
Date data sharing statement initially provided
28/11/2024
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Reduction of Maintenance Immunosuppression in Kidney Transplant Recipients during Acute Complicated Urinary Tract Infection
Query!
Scientific title
Rates of Clinical Cure and Microbiological Eradication following Reduction of Maintenance Immunosuppression in Kidney Transplant Recipients during Acute Complicated Urinary Tract Infection
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
313175
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Kidney transplant recipients
335458
0
Query!
Complicated urinary tract infection
335459
0
Query!
Immunosuppressive therapy
335460
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Renal and Urogenital
332018
332018
0
0
Query!
Kidney disease
Query!
Infection
332019
332019
0
0
Query!
Studies of infection and infectious agents
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Reduction of maintenance immunosuppression
In eligible patients with cUTI requiring hospitalization, we completely withdraw the antimetabolite (mycophenolate mofetil or mycophenolate sodium) dose from maintenance immunosuppression. Antimetabolite will be discontinued within 24 hours (calculated to the first missed dose) after admission to the hospital. Treatment with full-dose antimetabolite will be reinitiated on the first day after clinical cure and microbiological eradication (overall treatment success). The vast majority of patients from our transplant center (Charles University Teaching Hospital in Pilsen) use a standard maintenance immunosuppressive protocol based on tacrolimus (rarely cyclosporine A) and mycophenolate mofetil (or mycophenolate sodium) with corticosteroid (prednisone). For clinical and study purpose, tacrolimus (or cyclosporine A) levels will be monitored at baseline and then at predefined checkpoints (days 3, 5, 7 and 14). In case of progression of the clinical condition to sepsis/septic shock after randomization requiring admission to the ICU, patients will be considered for modulation (complete discontinuation or lower target levels) of tacrolimus (or cyclosporine A) dose and steroid stress dose (e.g. hydrocortisone 50mg every 6 hours) in addition to antimetabolite withdrawal for safety reasons. Otherwise, if target levels are measured and the patient is stable, we will not adjust the dose of tacrolimus (or cyclosporine A) a priori. Calcineurin inhibitor dose adjustments will be made at the baseline and during the infection only if the level is measured outside the target range. Target trough levels of tacrolimus will be 5-12 ng/mL over the first 3 months after transplantation and subsequently 5-8 ng/mL. Similarly, we will not increase the maintenance dose of steroids (mostly prednisone 5 mg daily) in clinically stable patients. The transplant nephrologist, possibly in collaboration with the intensive care unit physician, will be responsible for any change in medication, including immunosuppressive and other therapy. In particular, an electronic database of medical and patient records will be used to monitor adherence to the intervention and related issues.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
329748
0
Prevention
Query!
Intervention code [2]
329749
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Maintaining immunosuppression (control group)
Patients randomized to the group with no reduction of maintenance immunosuppression will continue to receive the antimetabolite at the full dose during infection corresponding to the mycophenolic acid (MPA) area under the curve (AUC) of 30-60 mg*h/L investigated in the past. The same rules will apply for steroid dosing, monitoring and potential tacrolimus (or cyclosporine A) dose adjustment as for the first group. Also, in case of progression of the clinical condition to sepsis/septic shock after randomization requiring ICU admission, antimetabolite dose will be completely discontinued, a stress dose of steroid (e.g. hydrocortisone 50 mg every 6 hours) and modulation of tacrolimus (or cyclosporine A) dose will be considered. The transplant nephrologist, possibly in collaboration with the intensive care unit physician, will be responsible for any change in medication, including immunosuppressive and other therapy. In particular, an electronic database of medical and patient records will be used to monitor adherence to the intervention and related issues.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
339621
0
Clinical cure and microbiological eradication (overall treatment success) This will be assessed as a composite outcome of both clinical cure and microbiological eradication.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
339621
0
Clinical assessment including the use of the clinical scoring tool and microbiological assessment of urine and blood culture The essence for the clinical screening tool, which is in accordance with the FDA recommendation, was taken from previously published studies. 1) US Department of Health and Human Services; Food and Drug Administration; Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Complicated urinary tract infections: developing drugs for treatment: guidance for industry. June 2018. Accessed September 10, 2018. 2) Perry C, Hossain M, Powell M, et al. Design of Two Phase III, Randomized, Multicenter Studies Comparing Gepotidacin with Nitrofurantoin for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection in Female Participants. Infect Dis Ther. 2022 Dec;11(6):2297-2310. 3) Kaye KS, Belley A, Barth P, et al. Effect of Cefepime/Enmetazobactam vs Piperacillin/Tazobactam on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Eradication in Patients with Complicated Urinary Tract Infection or Acute Pyelonephritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2022;328(13):1304–1314. 4) Kaye KS, Bhowmick T, Metallidis S, et al. Effect of Meropenem-Vaborbactam vs Piperacillin-Tazobactam on Clinical Cure or Improvement and Microbial Eradication in Complicated Urinary Tract Infection: The TANGO I Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018 Feb 27;319(8):788-799.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
339621
0
Day 7 after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
440631
0
Clinical cure and microbiological eradication (overall treatment success) This will be assessed as a composite outcome of both clinical cure and microbiological eradication.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
440631
0
Clinical assessment including the use of the clinical scoring tool and microbiological assessment of urine and blood culture The essence for the clinical screening tool, which is in accordance with the FDA recommendation, was taken from previously published studies. 1) US Department of Health and Human Services; Food and Drug Administration; Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Complicated urinary tract infections: developing drugs for treatment: guidance for industry. June 2018. Accessed September 10, 2018. 2) Perry C, Hossain M, Powell M, et al. Design of Two Phase III, Randomized, Multicenter Studies Comparing Gepotidacin with Nitrofurantoin for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection in Female Participants. Infect Dis Ther. 2022 Dec;11(6):2297-2310. 3) Kaye KS, Belley A, Barth P, et al. Effect of Cefepime/Enmetazobactam vs Piperacillin/Tazobactam on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Eradication in Patients with Complicated Urinary Tract Infection or Acute Pyelonephritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2022;328(13):1304–1314. 4) Kaye KS, Bhowmick T, Metallidis S, et al. Effect of Meropenem-Vaborbactam vs Piperacillin-Tazobactam on Clinical Cure or Improvement and Microbial Eradication in Complicated Urinary Tract Infection: The TANGO I Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018 Feb 27;319(8):788-799.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
440631
0
Day 5 and 14 after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
440632
0
Decrease in procalcitonin (PCT) < 0.25 µg/l or 80% or greater reduction in peak value and normalization of pyuria (< 10 white blood cells per cubic millimeter) or 90% or greater reduction in peak value This will be assessed as a composite outcome of reduction in both procalcitonin and pyuria.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
440632
0
Laboratory assessment - morphological/microscopic analysis of urine sample and determination of procalcitonin level from blood by electrochemiluminescence method (ECLIA)
Query!
Timepoint [2]
440632
0
Day 3 and 5 after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
440633
0
Comparison of procalcitonin absolute values during the first five days
Query!
Assessment method [3]
440633
0
Laboratory assessment - determination of procalcitonin level from blood by electrochemiluminescence method (ECLIA)
Query!
Timepoint [3]
440633
0
Day 1, 3 and 5 after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
440634
0
Progression to sepsis/septic shock requiring ICU admission after more than 48 hours of randomization (sepsis or septic shock must be related to cUTI)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
440634
0
Clinical assessment (including the use of the [quick] Sequential [Sepsis-related] Organ Failure Assessment score [qSOFA] and the National Early Warning Score [NEWS])
Query!
Timepoint [4]
440634
0
From 48 hours after randomization continuously until clinical cure and microbiological eradication is achieved
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
440635
0
Duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy
Query!
Assessment method [5]
440635
0
Monitoring of antibiotic regimen through electronic medical and patient records
Query!
Timepoint [5]
440635
0
Day 14 after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
440636
0
Microbiological eradication
Query!
Assessment method [6]
440636
0
Microbiological assessment of urine culture
Query!
Timepoint [6]
440636
0
Day 21 after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
440637
0
Incidence of repeated (recurrent) urinary tract infections
Query!
Assessment method [7]
440637
0
Clinical (including clinical scoring tool), laboratory (blood) and microbiological assessment (urine and blood culture) The essence for the clinical screening tool, which is in accordance with the FDA recommendation, was taken from previously published studies. 1) US Department of Health and Human Services; Food and Drug Administration; Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Complicated urinary tract infections: developing drugs for treatment: guidance for industry. June 2018. Accessed September 10, 2018. 2) Perry C, Hossain M, Powell M, et al. Design of Two Phase III, Randomized, Multicenter Studies Comparing Gepotidacin with Nitrofurantoin for the Treatment of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection in Female Participants. Infect Dis Ther. 2022 Dec;11(6):2297-2310. 3) Kaye KS, Belley A, Barth P, et al. Effect of Cefepime/Enmetazobactam vs Piperacillin/Tazobactam on Clinical Cure and Microbiological Eradication in Patients with Complicated Urinary Tract Infection or Acute Pyelonephritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2022;328(13):1304–1314. 4) Kaye KS, Bhowmick T, Metallidis S, et al. Effect of Meropenem-Vaborbactam vs Piperacillin-Tazobactam on Clinical Cure or Improvement and Microbial Eradication in Complicated Urinary Tract Infection: The TANGO I Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018 Feb 27;319(8):788-799.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
440637
0
6 months after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
440638
0
Incidence of clostridial enterocolitis
Query!
Assessment method [8]
440638
0
Clinical, laboratory (blood) and microbiological assessment (blood, stool)
Query!
Timepoint [8]
440638
0
6 months after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
440639
0
Cumulative incidence of CMV infection (DNAemia) defined by positive PCR for CMV DNA in whole blood
Query!
Assessment method [9]
440639
0
Quantitative real-time PCR DNA CMV from whole blood
Query!
Timepoint [9]
440639
0
6 months after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
440640
0
Incidence of other infections (particular interest will be given to CMV disease, polyomavirus viremia/nephropathy, respiratory infections, soft tissue infections and fungal infection)
Query!
Assessment method [10]
440640
0
Clinical, laboratory (blood), microbiological (blood, urine, sputum, nasopharyngeal swab, bronchoalveolar lavage, skin swab, etc.) and imaging assessment (X-ray, ultrasonography, computed tomography, positron emission tomography and computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging)
Query!
Timepoint [10]
440640
0
6 months after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
440641
0
Tacrolimus (or cyclosporine A) levels
Query!
Assessment method [11]
440641
0
Laboratory assessment - determination of tacrolimus (or cyclosporine A) levels from blood by CMIA (Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay)
Query!
Timepoint [11]
440641
0
Day 3, 5, 7 and 14 after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
440642
0
Incidence of de novo anti-HLA and DSA
Query!
Assessment method [12]
440642
0
Single antigen bead (SAB) testing by Luminex The method is based on incubation of specific microparticules binding HLA glycoproteins of class I or II with a small volume of serum of the patient tested.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
440642
0
6 months after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
440643
0
Incidence of acute and active rejection diagnosed by renal allograft biopsy (defined according to Banff criteria including both cellular and antibody-mediated rejection)
Query!
Assessment method [13]
440643
0
Renal allograft biopsy and use of the Banff 2022 classification
Query!
Timepoint [13]
440643
0
6 months after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
440644
0
Renal function assessed by serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using CKD-EPI formula and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) The parameters required to evaluate renal function will be evaluated as a composite outcome.
Query!
Assessment method [14]
440644
0
Laboratory assessment - determination of serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) rate using CKD-EPI formula 2021 and albuminuria (urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio)
Query!
Timepoint [14]
440644
0
Day 7, 14 and 1, 3 and 6 months after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
440647
0
Incidence of new-onset acute kidney injury between randomization and day 14 (new-onset AKI will be assessed compared to baseline or lowest prior serum creatinine level since enrollment according to definition of AKI)
Query!
Assessment method [15]
440647
0
Laboratory assessment (determination of serum creatinine) and diuresis monitoring
Query!
Timepoint [15]
440647
0
Day 14 after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
440648
0
Incidence of new (or worsening) graft dysfunction (defined as double or higher serum creatinine compared to pre-admission level or new need for renal replacement therapy)
Query!
Assessment method [16]
440648
0
Clinical, laboratory assessment (eGFR, serum creatinine, urine ACR) and diuresis monitoring
Query!
Timepoint [16]
440648
0
Months 1, 3 and 6 after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
440651
0
Comparison of white blood cell absolute values
Query!
Assessment method [17]
440651
0
Laboratory assessment (blood)
Query!
Timepoint [17]
440651
0
Day 3, 5, 7 and 14 after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
441382
0
Comparison of procalcitonin kinetics during the first five days.
Query!
Assessment method [18]
441382
0
Laboratory assessment - determination of procalcitonin level from blood by electrochemiluminescence method (ECLIA)
Query!
Timepoint [18]
441382
0
Day 1, 3 and 5 after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
441384
0
Severity of new-onset acute kidney injury between randomization and day 14 (new-onset AKI will be assessed compared to baseline or lowest prior serum creatinine level since enrollment according to definition of AKI)
Query!
Assessment method [19]
441384
0
Laboratory assessment (determination of serum creatinine) and diuresis monitoring
Query!
Timepoint [19]
441384
0
Day 14 after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
441385
0
Comparison of white blood cell kinetics
Query!
Assessment method [20]
441385
0
Laboratory assessment (blood)
Query!
Timepoint [20]
441385
0
Day 3, 5, 7 and 14 after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
441386
0
Comparison of hemoglobin concentration
Query!
Assessment method [21]
441386
0
Laboratory assessment (blood)
Query!
Timepoint [21]
441386
0
Day 3, 5, 7 and 14 after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
441387
0
Comparison of platelet counts
Query!
Assessment method [22]
441387
0
Laboratory assessment (blood)
Query!
Timepoint [22]
441387
0
Day 3, 5, 7 and 14 after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [23]
441388
0
Comparison of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activity
Query!
Assessment method [23]
441388
0
Laboratory assessment (blood)
Query!
Timepoint [23]
441388
0
Day 3, 5, 7 and 14 after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [24]
441389
0
Comparison of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity
Query!
Assessment method [24]
441389
0
Laboratory assessment (blood)
Query!
Timepoint [24]
441389
0
Day 3, 5, 7 and 14 after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [25]
441390
0
Comparison of bilirubin level
Query!
Assessment method [25]
441390
0
Laboratory assessment (blood)
Query!
Timepoint [25]
441390
0
Day 3, 5, 7 and 14 after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [26]
441391
0
Comparison of C-reactive protein (CRP) absolute values
Query!
Assessment method [26]
441391
0
Laboratory assessment (blood)
Query!
Timepoint [26]
441391
0
Day 3, 5, 7 and 14 after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [27]
441392
0
Comparison of C-reactive protein (CRP) kinetics
Query!
Assessment method [27]
441392
0
Laboratory assessment (blood)
Query!
Timepoint [27]
441392
0
Day 3, 5, 7 and 14 after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [28]
441393
0
Comparison of serum creatinine level
Query!
Assessment method [28]
441393
0
Laboratory assessment (blood)
Query!
Timepoint [28]
441393
0
Day 3, 5, 7 and 14 after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [29]
441394
0
Comparison of albuminuria
Query!
Assessment method [29]
441394
0
Laboratory assessment (urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio)
Query!
Timepoint [29]
441394
0
Day 3, 5, 7 and 14 after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [30]
441395
0
Comparison of sodium level
Query!
Assessment method [30]
441395
0
Laboratory assessment (blood)
Query!
Timepoint [30]
441395
0
Day 3, 5, 7 and 14 after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [31]
441396
0
Comparison of potassium level
Query!
Assessment method [31]
441396
0
Laboratory assessment (blood)
Query!
Timepoint [31]
441396
0
Day 3, 5, 7 and 14 after randomization
Query!
Secondary outcome [32]
441397
0
Comparison of chloride levels
Query!
Assessment method [32]
441397
0
Laboratory assessment (blood)
Query!
Timepoint [32]
441397
0
Day 3, 5, 7 and 14 after randomization
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Adult (18 years and over with no upper age limit) renal transplant patients, male or female.
2. Acute complicated urinary tract infection requiring hospitalization.
3. Ability to signed informed consent.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Patients presenting with clinical signs of sepsis or septic shock at baseline who require an intensive care unit (ICU).
Note: The timing of enrollment and randomization (the time period between hospital admission and randomization) will be decided by an experienced investigator based on the evolution of the patient’s clinical condition.
2. Patients who do not meet the signs or symptoms of complicated urinary tract infection.
3. Suspected or confirmed acute bacterial prostatitis, orchitis, epididymitis or chronic bacterial prostatitis.
4. Suspected or confirmed cyst infection in polycystic kidney disease, renal corticomedullary or perinephric abscess.
5. Presence or treatment of any infection within the past 14 days and at the time of enrollment (will include patients requiring preemptive treatment with valganciclovir for significant CMV DNAemia or modulation of immunosuppression for significant BK polyomavirus viremia).
6. Treatment of biopsy-proven acute/active graft rejection 1 month or less before inclusion.
7. Patients not treated with antimetabolite at baseline.
8. Severe leukopenia or thrombocytopenia or gastrointestinal symptoms at baseline requiring antimetabolite withdrawal.
9. Inability to sign informed consent.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Sealed opaque envelopes
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Random-number table, at a 1:1 ratio with the use of random block sizes of 4
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 4
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
The study will be designed as a superiority trial. The collected data from the randomized patients in the study will be primarily analyzed using microbiological intention-to-treat analysis (micro-ITT population). The microbiological ITT population will include all randomized patients with confirmed gram-negative or gram-positive bacteria of 10^5 CFU/ml or more in baseline urine culture (up to two isolated pathogens) or the same bacterial pathogen present in concurrent blood and urine culture. Figures from randomized trials in renal transplant patients with cUTI indicating the rate of clinical cure and microbiological eradication (overall success) are not available. The overall success rate of ATB therapy for cUTI in the general population ranges from 92 to 94% around day 8 of treatment. Therefore, based on these data and our clinical experience, we expect an 85 % clinical cure and microbiological eradication rate assessed on day 7 after randomization in renal transplant patients who will be completely withdrawn from antimetabolite therapy at the start of cUTI. In patients with cUTI and maintained immunosuppression, the overall treatment success rate on day 7 is anticipated to be 60 %. A total of 98 (49 per group) patients will be required to achieve an 85 % clinical cure and microbiological eradication rate (power = 0.80; alpha = 0.05). Given the anticipated number of patients with no baseline pathogens (<10^5 CFU/ml gram-negative or gram-positive bacteria in urine culture or absence of the same bacterial pathogen in concurrent blood and urine culture) and dropouts, a minimum target number of 112 patients will be enrolled.
Qualitative data will be analyzed using the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Quantitative data will be compared using Student’s t-test in parametric distribution and Mann-Whitney U-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test in non-parametric distribution. Participants related covariates including comorbid conditions, posttransplant time, observed laboratory parameters involving renal allograft function, tacrolimus (or cyclosporine A) levels, CRP and PCT levels, the number of white blood cells per cubic millimeter in urine sample, and urinary pathogen characteristics will be assessed as potential risk factors to clinical and microbiological failure. Logistic regression analysis will be performed first. Covariates with a P value less than or equal to 0.2 will be included in multivariate stepwise logistic regression. Results will be expressed as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Statistical calculations will be made using Statistica 8 software (StatSoft, Germany). Values of P <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
6/01/2025
Query!
Actual
25/06/2025
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
15/01/2029
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
17/07/2029
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
112
Query!
Accrual to date
1
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
26632
0
Czech Republic
Query!
State/province [1]
26632
0
Pilsen
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
317618
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
317618
0
Cooperatio Program, Charles University in Prague; research areas "Immunity and Infections" and "Internal Disciplines"
Query!
Address [1]
317618
0
Query!
Country [1]
317618
0
Czech Republic
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Query!
Name
prof. Tomas Reischig, MD, PhD - Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, and Teaching Hospital
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Czech Republic
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
319936
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
319936
0
Petr Drenko, MD, PhD - Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, and Teaching Hospital
Query!
Address [1]
319936
0
Query!
Country [1]
319936
0
Czech Republic
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
316323
0
Ethics Committee of The University Hospital and the Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Pilsen
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
316323
0
Edvarda Beneše 1128/13, 301 00 Pilsen (Bory) - Czech Republic
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
316323
0
Czech Republic
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
316323
0
08/07/2024
Query!
Approval date [1]
316323
0
01/08/2024
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
316323
0
229/24
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Reduction of maintenance immunosuppression during acute bacterial infection is a common part of management in kidney transplant recipients. However, data from randomized trials evaluating the effect of reducing or maintaining immunosuppression are not available. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of reducing maintenance immunosuppression (discontinuation of antimetabolite) during acute complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) in hospitalized kidney transplant recipients compared to maintaining immunosuppression with respect to short-term clinical, microbiological and renal outcomes. In eligible patients we completely withdraw the antimetabolite (mycophenolate mofetil or mycophenolate sodium) dose from maintenance immunosuppression. Patients randomized to the group (control group) with no reduction of maintenance immunosuppression will continue to receive the antimetabolite at the full dose during infection corresponding to the mycophenolic acid (MPA) area under the curve (AUC) of 30-60 mg*h/L investigated in the past. In particular, the study should answer the question of whether a reduction in immunosuppression during cUTI leads to significantly higher rates of clinical cure and microbiological eradication (overall treatment success) and whether it poses a risk for the development of graft dysfunction, including the incidence of rejection.
Query!
Trial website
None
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
137522
0
Dr Petr Drenko
Query!
Address
137522
0
Department of Internal Medicine I, Biomedical Centre Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, and Teaching Hospital, Alej Svobody 80 304 60 Pilsen, Czech Republic
Query!
Country
137522
0
Czech Republic
Query!
Phone
137522
0
+420 377103573
Query!
Fax
137522
0
Query!
Email
137522
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
137523
0
Petr Drenko
Query!
Address
137523
0
Department of Internal Medicine I, Biomedical Centre Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, and Teaching Hospital, Alej Svobody 80 304 60 Pilsen, Czech Republic
Query!
Country
137523
0
Czech Republic
Query!
Phone
137523
0
+420 377103573
Query!
Fax
137523
0
Query!
Email
137523
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
137524
0
Petr Drenko
Query!
Address
137524
0
Department of Internal Medicine I, Biomedical Centre Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, and Teaching Hospital, Alej Svobody 80 304 60 Pilsen, Czech Republic
Query!
Country
137524
0
Czech Republic
Query!
Phone
137524
0
+420 377103573
Query!
Fax
137524
0
Query!
Email
137524
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will the study consider sharing individual participant data?
Yes
Will there be any conditions when requesting access to individual participant data?
Persons/groups eligible to request access:
•
Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal, clinicians case-by-case basis at the discretion of Primary Sponsor.
Conditions for requesting access:
•
-
What individual participant data might be shared?
•
All of the individual participant data collected during the trial without identification of participants names.
What types of analyses could be done with individual participant data?
•
For any purpose.
When can requests for individual participant data be made (start and end dates)?
From:
Immediately following publication, no end date.
To:
-
Where can requests to access individual participant data be made, or data be obtained directly?
•
Approval by Principal Investigator upon request by email (
[email protected]
).
Are there extra considerations when requesting access to individual participant data?
No
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
[email protected]
Protocol of the study.docx
Ethical approval
[email protected]
Ethical approval 1.pdf
Ethical approval
[email protected]
Ethical approval 2.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
[email protected]
Statistical plan is included within the Study prot...
[
More Details
]
Protocol of the study.docx
Informed consent form
[email protected]
Informed consent.docx
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF