Trial Review

Please note the ANZCTR will be unattended from Friday 20 December 2024 for the holidays. The Registry will re-open on Tuesday 7 January 2025. Submissions and updates will not be processed during that time.

Registering a new trial?

To achieve prospective registration, we recommend submitting your trial for registration at the same time as ethics submission.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial registered on ANZCTR


Registration number
ACTRN12624000777594
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
16/01/2024
Date registered
25/06/2024
Date last updated
25/06/2024
Date data sharing statement initially provided
25/06/2024
Date results provided
25/06/2024
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered

Titles & IDs
Public title
Effects of chromium picolinate as an adjuvant on HbA1c levels in diabetic patients, and on eGFR and serum creatinine levels in diabetes induced renal impaired patients.
Scientific title
Effects of chromium picolinate as an adjuvant on HbA1c levels in diabetic patients, and on eGFR and serum creatinine levels in diabetes induced renal impaired patients.
Secondary ID [1] 306008 0
None
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1300-7022
Trial acronym
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Diabetes 325438 0
Diabetes Induced Renal Impairment 333324 0
Condition category
Condition code
Metabolic and Endocrine 322815 322815 0 0
Diabetes
Renal and Urogenital 322816 322816 0 0
Kidney disease

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Participants in this group received a combination treatment of chromium picolinate alongside their existing hypoglycemic medications. Hypoglycemic agents dosage must be stable for at least 60 days prior to entering trial. This additional therapy involves administering a 500 µg chromium picolinate tablet once daily for an extended period of 45 days. To monitor compliance, participants were asked to bring all remaining tablets along with medication containers to their final visit. Adherence was assessed by counting the unused tablets and verifying the completeness of dosing records in their diaries.
Intervention code [1] 322975 0
Treatment: Drugs
Comparator / control treatment
Participants in the control group maintained their pre-existing antidiabetic medication regimen, which include drugs from the anti-diabetic drug classes such as biguanides, sulfonylureas, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4 inhibitors). Medication dosage must be stable for at least 60 days prior to entering trial.
Control group
Active

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 336619 0
Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) concentration was determined as a percentage of total hemoglobin using Cobas b 101. test system.
Timepoint [1] 336619 0
At baseline and at 45 days post intervention commencement.
Primary outcome [2] 336639 0
Serum creatinine concentration was determined quantitatively in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) using a Roche Cobas Analyzer employing the Jaffé Gen.2 kinetic colorimetric assay. In this method, creatinine reacts with picric acid under alkaline conditions to form a yellow-orange complex, with the rate of color formation proportional to creatinine concentration.
Timepoint [2] 336639 0
At baseline and at 45 days post intervention commencement.
Primary outcome [3] 336640 0
Participants eGFR was assessed by using the Cockcroft-Gault equation.
For male participants: eGFR = 175*((creatinine)^-1.154)*((age)^-0.203)
For female participants: eGFR = = 175*((creatinine)^-1.154)*((age)^-0.203)*0.742
Timepoint [3] 336640 0
At baseline and at 45 days post intervention commencement.
Secondary outcome [1] 429013 0
"Serum total cholesterol (TC) concentration was determined quantitatively in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) as part of the lipid profile using the Cobas C system. The analysis likely employed an enzymatic colorimetric assay, where cholesterol esters are hydrolyzed, and the released cholesterol is oxidized to produce a colored product.
Timepoint [1] 429013 0
At baseline and at 45 days post intervention commencement.
Secondary outcome [2] 433214 0
Serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentration was determined in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) as part of the lipid profile using the Cobas C system. The analysis employed homogeneous enzymatic colorimetric assay for direct measurement of LDL-C.
Timepoint [2] 433214 0
At baseline and at 45 days post intervention commencement.
Secondary outcome [3] 433215 0
Serum very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C) concentration was estimated in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) as part of the lipid profile. The calculation employed the Friedewald equation (VLDL-C = Triglycerides / 5), where triglyceride concentration was directly measured.
Timepoint [3] 433215 0
At baseline and at 45 days post intervention commencement.
Secondary outcome [4] 433216 0
Serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentration was determined quantitatively in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) as part of the lipid profile using the Cobas C system. The analysis likely employed a homogeneous enzymatic colorimetric method for selective measurement of HDL-C
Timepoint [4] 433216 0
At baseline and at 45 days post intervention commencement.
Secondary outcome [5] 433217 0
Serum triglyceride concentration was determined quantitatively in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) as part of the lipid profile using the Cobas C Roche/Hitachi system. The analysis likely employed an enzymatic colorimetric assay, where triglycerides are hydrolyzed to glycerol and fatty acids, followed by a series of reactions ultimately producing a measurable colored product.
Timepoint [5] 433217 0
At baseline and at 45 days post intervention commencement.
Secondary outcome [6] 433218 0
Urinary creatinine concentration was determined quantitatively in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) using a Roche Cobas C analyzer. The analysis likely employed the Jaffé kinetic method, where creatinine reacts with picric acid under alkaline conditions to form a colored complex.
Timepoint [6] 433218 0
At baseline and at 45 days post intervention commencement.
Secondary outcome [7] 433219 0
Urinary protein concentration was determined quantitatively in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) using a Roche Cobas C analyzer.
Timepoint [7] 433219 0
At baseline and at 45 days post intervention commencement.
Secondary outcome [8] 433220 0
The Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) is a dimensionless value calculated by using formula : UPCR = Urine Protein Concentration (mg/dL) / Urine Creatinine Concentration (mg/dL)
Timepoint [8] 433220 0
At baseline and at 45 days post intervention commencement.
Secondary outcome [9] 433272 0
Body weight was determined in kilograms (kg) using a calibrated digital weighing balance. Participants were instructed to stand with minimal clothing and shoes removed, with weight evenly distributed on both feet.
Timepoint [9] 433272 0
At baseline and at 45 days post intervention commencement.
Secondary outcome [10] 433273 0
Waist circumference (WC) was determined in centimeters by measuring the midpoint between the lower margin of the last palpable rib and the top of the iliac crest, just above the belly button with a flexible, non-stretchable tape measure.
Timepoint [10] 433273 0
At baseline and at 45 days post intervention commencement.
Secondary outcome [11] 433274 0
Hip circumference (HC) was determined in centimeters by measuring the widest circumference around the buttocks, ensuring the tape measure remained parallel to the floor.
Timepoint [11] 433274 0
At baseline and at 45 days post intervention commencement.
Secondary outcome [12] 433275 0
Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated by dividing participants' body weight in kilograms (kg) by the square of their height in meters (m²).
Timepoint [12] 433275 0
At baseline and at 45 days post intervention commencement.
Secondary outcome [13] 433276 0
Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg) using the auscultatory method with a calibrated sphygmomanometer and stethoscope. Participants were seated in a relaxed position with their arm supported at heart level, and the measurement was taken over the brachial artery.
Timepoint [13] 433276 0
At baseline and at 45 days post intervention commencement.
Secondary outcome [14] 433277 0
Diastolic blood pressure was measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg) using the auscultatory method with a calibrated sphygmomanometer and stethoscope. Participants were seated in a relaxed position with their arm supported at heart level, and the measurement was taken over the brachial artery.
Timepoint [14] 433277 0
At baseline and at 45 days post intervention commencement.
Secondary outcome [15] 433620 0
Standing height was measured in centimeters (cm) using a stadiometer. Participants were instructed to stand barefoot with their heels together, back straight against the stadiometer, and head positioned in the Frankfort horizontal plane (looking straight ahead)."
Timepoint [15] 433620 0
At baseline and at 45 days post intervention commencement.
Secondary outcome [16] 434688 0
A patient self-reporting technique was employed to monitor the occurrence of any new or worsening neurological symptoms throughout the duration of the trial. Participants were instructed to decribe symptoms suggestive of neurological adverse event such as seizures, motor dysfunction and changes in cognition, mood, or behavior.
Timepoint [16] 434688 0
Subjects were contacted at Days 15 and 30 post intervention commencement by the call center and reminded to report all neurological adverse events. Patients were canvassed verbally at their final visit as to whether they had experienced any neurological adverse event
Secondary outcome [17] 434689 0
A patient self-reporting technique was employed to monitor the occurrence of any new or worsening Gastrointestinal symptoms throughout the duration of the trial. Participants were instructed to decribe symptoms suggestive of gastrointestinal adverse event such as nausea, vomiting, bloating, constipation and abdominal pain.
Timepoint [17] 434689 0
Subjects were contacted at Days 15 and 30 post intervention commencement by the call center and reminded to report all gastrointestinal adverse events. Patients were canvassed verbally at their final visit as to whether they had experienced any gastrointestinal adverse events.
Secondary outcome [18] 434690 0
A patient self-reporting technique was employed to monitor for any new or worsening skin or tissue adverse events throughout the trial. Participants were instructed to decribe symptoms suggestive of skin and tissue adverse event such as tenderness, rash, edema and skin irritation.
Timepoint [18] 434690 0
Subjects were contacted at Days 15 and 30 post intervention commencement by the call center and reminded to report any new or worsening skin or tissue adverse events. Patients were also canvassed verbally at their final visit to inquire about any skin or tissue adverse events they may have experienced
Secondary outcome [19] 434691 0
A patient self-reporting technique was employed to monitor for any new or worsening musculoskeletal adverse events throughout the trial. Participants were instructed to decribe symptoms suggestive of musculoskeletal adverse event such as pain, stiffness, weakness, or limitations in movement.
Timepoint [19] 434691 0
Subjects were contacted at Days 15 and 30 post intervention commencement by the call center and reminded to report any new or worsening of musculoskeletal adverse events. Patients were also canvassed verbally at their final visit to inquire about any musculoskeletal adverse events they may have experienced.
Secondary outcome [20] 434692 0
A patient self-reporting technique was employed to monitor for any new or worsening symptoms suggestive of metabolic events throughout the trial. Participants were instructed to decribe symptoms suggestive of metabolic event such as thirst, fatigue, changes in appetite, or frequent urination.
Timepoint [20] 434692 0
Subjects were contacted at Days 15 and 30 post intervention commencement by the call center and reminded to report any new or worsening of metabolic adverse events. Patients were also canvassed verbally at their final visit to inquire about any metabolic adverse events they may have experienced.
Secondary outcome [21] 434693 0
A patient self-reporting technique was employed to capture any new or worsening symptoms potentially related to general medical conditions throughout the trial. Participants were instructed to decribe symptoms suggestive of general medical conditions, such as hypertension, arrhythmias, anemia and arthritis.
Timepoint [21] 434693 0
Subjects were contacted at Days 15 and 30 post intervention commencement by the call center and reminded to report any new or worsening of general medicine events. Patients were also canvassed verbally at their final visit to inquire about any general medicine adverse events they may have experienced.
Secondary outcome [22] 434694 0
A patient self-reporting technique was employed to capture any new or worsening symptoms potentially related to immune system throughout the trial. Participants were instructed to decribe symptoms suggestive of immune reactions, such as runny nose, cough, shortness of breath, and swalloen lymph nodes.
Timepoint [22] 434694 0
Subjects were contacted at Days 15 and 30 post intervention commencement by the call center and reminded to report any new or worsening of immune system events. Patients were also canvassed verbally at their final visit to inquire about any immune system adverse events they may have experienced.
Secondary outcome [23] 434695 0
A patient self-reporting system was employed to capture the incidence of hypoglycemic events. Participants were instructed to describe about the symptoms suggestive of hypoglycemia, such as sweating, dizziness, shakiness, confusion, and hunger. A glucose monitoring device was used randomly with objective blood glucose measurements.
Timepoint [23] 434695 0
Subjects were contacted at Days 15 and 30 post intervention commencement by the call center and reminded to report any new or worsening of hypoglycemic events. Patients were also canvassed verbally at their final visit to inquire about any hypoglycemic adverse events they may have experienced.

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1) Men and Women 26 - 70 years old
2) Patients having HBA1C greater than 7.0%
3) Diagnosis of type-2 DM greater than or equal to 12 months
4) Patients currently taking anti-diabetic drugs (ADD), stable for greater than or equal to 60 days prior to entry
5) Patients who give informed consent
Minimum age
26 Years
Maximum age
70 Years
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
The exclusion criteria for the participants were as follow
1) Chromium Picolinate supplementation in lasst 90 days before the start of the trial in any form greater than or equal to 120µg/d.
2) Acute Conditions like stroke
3) Patients having hepatic diseases
4) Patients with Alcohol or drugs abuse
5) Issues with the subject's mental health that would prohibit them from finishing the
study
6) Female with pregnancy or breast feeding
7) Failure to give informed consent

Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
To ensure allocation concealment, sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes (SNOSE) were employed. The treatment assignments were placed within the SNOSE by a researcher not involved in participant recruitment or assessment.
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
The randomization schedule was generated using validated computer software, employing a blocked randomization design with fixed block sizes of six subjects per treatment arm.
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?


The people assessing the outcomes
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Other design features
Phase
Phase 2
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
5/10/2022
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
12/10/2022
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
15/12/2022
Sample size
Target
140
Accrual to date
Final
100
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 25974 0
Pakistan
State/province [1] 25974 0
Punjab

Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1] 310351 0
Self funded/Unfunded
Name [1] 310351 0
Dr. Muhammad Bilal Liaqat
Country [1] 310351 0
Pakistan
Funding source category [2] 316194 0
Hospital
Name [2] 316194 0
T.H.Q Hospital Jaranwala
Country [2] 316194 0
Pakistan
Funding source category [3] 316195 0
University
Name [3] 316195 0
Government College University Faisalabad
Country [3] 316195 0
Pakistan
Primary sponsor type
Individual
Name
Dr. Malik Hassan Mehmood
Address
Chairperson Office, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Government College University, Faisalabad city-38000
Country
Pakistan
Secondary sponsor category [1] 311486 0
Individual
Name [1] 311486 0
Dr. Rida Siddique
Address [1] 311486 0
Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Government College University, Kotwali Rd, Faisalabad City, Punjab 38000
Country [1] 311486 0
Pakistan

Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Ethics committee name [1] 310007 0
Institutional Review Board, Government College University Faisalabad
Ethics committee address [1] 310007 0
Ethics committee country [1] 310007 0
Pakistan
Date submitted for ethics approval [1] 310007 0
Approval date [1] 310007 0
11/09/2022
Ethics approval number [1] 310007 0
GCUF/ERC/ 186

Summary
Brief summary
Trial website
Trial related presentations / publications
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 116162 0
Dr Muhammad Bilal Liaqat
Address 116162 0
Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Government College University, Allama Iqbal Road, Faisalabad-38000,Punjab-Pakistan
Country 116162 0
Pakistan
Phone 116162 0
+923350048595
Fax 116162 0
Email 116162 0
m.bilal44ali@gmai.com
Contact person for public queries
Name 116163 0
Muhammad Bilal Liaqat
Address 116163 0
Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Government College University, Allama Iqbal Road, Faisalabad-38000,Punjab-Pakistan
Country 116163 0
Pakistan
Phone 116163 0
+923350048595
Fax 116163 0
Email 116163 0
m.bilal44ali@gmai.com
Contact person for scientific queries
Name 116164 0
Muhammad Bilal Liaqat
Address 116164 0
Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Government College University, Allama Iqbal Road, Faisalabad-38000,Punjab-Pakistan
Country 116164 0
Pakistan
Phone 116164 0
+923350048595
Fax 116164 0
Email 116164 0
m.bilal44ali@gmai.com

Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
What data in particular will be shared?
All data after de-identification shall be shared.
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
Immediately following publication, no end date.
Available to whom?
Anyone who wishes to access it, only researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal at discretion of Principal Investigator.
Available for what types of analyses?
Available for meta-analysis
How or where can data be obtained?
By email to Principal Investigator at m.bilal44ali@gmail.com


What supporting documents are/will be available?

Doc. No.TypeCitationLinkEmailOther DetailsAttachment
20999Informed consent form    Informed consent shall be shared only as an eviden... [More Details]
21000Ethical approval    383276-(Uploaded-23-11-2023-02-10-10)-Study-related document.pdf



Results publications and other study-related documents

Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.

Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.