The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial registered on ANZCTR


Registration number
ACTRN12620000637943
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
3/06/2019
Date registered
29/05/2020
Date last updated
29/05/2020
Date data sharing statement initially provided
29/05/2020
Type of registration
Prospectively registered

Titles & IDs
Public title
Evaluating the use of bedside ultrasound versus x-ray to diagnose forearm fractures in children; a randomised trial
Scientific title
Bedside Ultrasound Conducted in Kids with distal upper Limb fractures in the Emergency Department; an open diagnostic randomised-controlled trial and health economic analysis. (BUCKLED RCT)
Secondary ID [1] 298394 0
Nil known
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
U1111-1234-5856
Trial acronym
BUCKLED RCT
Linked study record
BUCKLED (diagnostic) - U1111-1205-3611, ACTRN12617001648314

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Paediatric forearm fractures 313085 0
Condition category
Condition code
Injuries and Accidents 311571 311571 0 0
Fractures
Musculoskeletal 313976 313976 0 0
Other muscular and skeletal disorders

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Eligible patients will be randomised to either bedside ultrasound, otherwise known as point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), or x-ray imaging as the initial diagnostic approach.

POCUS Intervention:
POCUS will be performed by a health practitioner (nurse, doctor, allied health professional) who has undergone training and credentialing. This will involve application of gel on the affected forearm which is then interrogated with a high frequency linear probe for up to 10 minutes, using a 6-view protocol for evaluation of signs of a fracture.

Patients' fractures will be classified into 3 groups: 'no' fracture, 'buckle' fracture or 'other' fracture (i.e. cortical breach fracture, including greenstick, complete or physeal; bow deformity and fractures at other sites will also be included in this group). Both the radius and ulna bones will be individually classified, with the overall forearm classification based on the overarching fracture that determined the management of the patient. If a cortical breach or other signs of a cortical breach (e.g. periosteal haematoma) are identified on POCUS, they will receive an x-ray. 'Pain out of proportion' on physical examination, despite the findings on POCUS, will also mandate an x-ray. This will include patients who have uncontrolled pain, ongoing tenderness or reduced function despite adequate analgesia and is not felt to be in keeping with a soft tissue injury, as per treating clinician judgement. If either 'no' fracture or a 'buckle' fracture are identified on POCUS, they will not receive an x-ray prior to discharge. POCUS images will be later reviewed for correct interpretations.

All patients who are diagnosed with either a 'buckle' fracture or 'no' fracture will be given a tentative appointment for ED clinical review in 1 week (5-7 day convenience window).
Intervention code [1] 314638 0
Diagnosis / Prognosis
Intervention code [2] 316426 0
Treatment: Devices
Comparator / control treatment
Eligible patients randomised to x-ray imaging will have a minimum of 2-views performed (anteroposterior and lateral) by a radiographer, usually a process that takes 10 minutes if immediately available. Patients will receive routine care according to the interpretation of the x-ray, which will again be categorised into the 3 fracture groups. The 'no' fracture group will be managed at the clinician's discretion (documented), the 'buckle' fracture group will be managed in a wrist splint and the 'other' fracture group will be managed in a plaster cast.

All patients who are diagnosed in either the 'buckle' fracture or 'no' fracture groups will be given a tentative appointment for ED clinical review within 1 week (5-7 day convenience window).
Control group
Active

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 320277 0
The difference in functional outcome between the two diagnostic modality arms will be determined using a PROMIS tool. The PROMIS Pediatric Upper Extremity Short questionnaire is a validated tool that assesses the physical function, including activities of daily living, for patients 5-15 years of age.
Timepoint [1] 320277 0
The PROMIS tool scores will be determined at baseline (premorbid), 1 week and 4 weeks. The primary outcome of the study will be the PROMIS score at 28 days (+/- 3 day window).
Secondary outcome [1] 371056 0
Health economic analysis will be conducted to determine the cost-effectiveness of both imaging modalities in the diagnosis of paediatric distal forearm injuries. The CHU9D instrument will be utilised, alongside the PROMIS, to enable a complete cost-utility analysis. The analysis will also take into account any change in the total length of stay in the ED, as well as any change in the number of x-rays conducted. Detailed resource utilisation (labour, consumables, imaging) will be reported for both the POCUS and x-ray (routine care) trial arms for each site. The sum cost of resources, including implementation, staff labour, equipment and ED length of stay, will then be estimated per patient for both models of care.
Timepoint [1] 371056 0
CHU9D data collected at baseline (prior to randomisation), 1 and 4 weeks. Overall analysis will be conducted at the end of the recruitment period.
Secondary outcome [2] 371057 0
Patient (child) and parent satisfaction
Timepoint [2] 371057 0
Satisfaction scores based on a 5-point Likert scale will be collected at 4 weeks and 3 months post recruitment for each patient
Secondary outcome [3] 371058 0
Complications related to the injury. For example, loss of function, growth disturbance, unexpected surgical intervention
Timepoint [3] 371058 0
All patients enrolled in the study will also be contacted at 3 months post recruitment to determine. This will include the number of return visits to hospital relating to the initial injury.
Secondary outcome [4] 371059 0
ED length of stay will be determined from the clinical records.
Timepoint [4] 371059 0
Length of stay will be defined from the time the patient was triaged to the time of discharge (home or admission to the ward).
Secondary outcome [5] 378297 0
Pain scores will be recorded using the Faces Pain Scale Revised for each child.
Timepoint [5] 378297 0
Baseline (prior to randomisation), 1 and 4 weeks.
Secondary outcome [6] 382371 0
The diagnostic accuracy of POCUS and x-ray imaging will be determined against the gold standard final diagnosis, as determined by the consensus from an expert panel based on the clinical course, investigations and final management. Diagnostic accuracy will be determined for 'any' fracture ('buckle' and 'other' fractures combined) and 'other' fractures alone ('buckle' and 'no' fractures combined as the comparator)
Timepoint [6] 382371 0
Diagnostic accuracy will be determined after their 3 months contact.
Secondary outcome [7] 382372 0
The rate of avoidance of x-ray imaging in the POCUS group for the 'no' fracture and 'buckle' fracture groups will be determined from review of hospital records and parent survey.
Timepoint [7] 382372 0
4 weeks and 3 months
Secondary outcome [8] 383152 0
Treatment time in ED will be determined from the clinical records.
Timepoint [8] 383152 0
Time from clinical review of the patient until time of discharge from ED

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
• Children aged 5-15 years presenting to the ED
• Isolated, non-angulated distal third forearm injury being evaluated for suspected fracture
Minimum age
5 Years
Maximum age
15 Years
Gender
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
• Injury sustained >48 hour at time of ED presentation
• External imaging has already been performed
• Known metabolic bone disease, such as osteogenesis imperfecta
• Suspicion of non-accidental injury
• Congenital bone malformation, such as radius hypoplasia
• Compound fracture
• Neurovascular compromise
• Distracting injury (e.g. elbow)
• Suspicion for hand fracture (e.g. scaphoid)
• Inability to perform an accurate clinical assessment e.g. severe developmental delay or behavioural difficulties
• Inability to perform ultrasound due to unavailability of a credentialed practitioner
• Inability to obtain informed consent from parent

Study design
Purpose of the study
Diagnosis
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Central randomisation via computer program (Griffith University). Patients will be randomised after agreeing to participate in study.
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Randomisation to either the POCUS or x-ray imaging as the initial diagnostic approach will occur after stratification by site and age (5-9 years and 10-15 years). Randomisation will be in a 1:1 ratio within blocks of size 6-8 (size randomly selected).
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?



Intervention assignment
Parallel
Other design features
Child, parent and treating clinician(s) not masked. Radiographer and reporting radiologist masked to the initial diagnostic allocation and any POCUS findings.
Phase
Not Applicable
Type of endpoint(s)
Efficacy
Statistical methods / analysis
Sample size calculations have been undertaken on a non-inferiority hypothesis comparing POCUS with standard care for the primary outcome of the PROMIS score at 28 days (+/- 3 days).. To achieve 90% power with a one-sided a of 0.025, we would require a sample size of 96 children with a buckle fracture (48 per arm). To obtain this sample size, approximately 300 children meeting the inclusion criteria will be randomised to the study. Based on pilot data, we expect 40% of the sample to be diagnosed with a buckle fracture, 40% to have no fracture identified and 20% to have fractures other than a buckle fracture. Allowing for attrition, this sample size is expected to yield the required 48 buckle fractures required in each diagnostic arm to determine any between group differences.

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
QLD
Recruitment hospital [1] 13886 0
Gold Coast University Hospital - Southport
Recruitment hospital [2] 13887 0
Robina Hospital - Robina
Recruitment hospital [3] 13888 0
Sunshine Coast University Hospital - Birtinya
Recruitment hospital [4] 13889 0
Nambour General Hospital - Nambour
Recruitment hospital [5] 13890 0
Ipswich Hospital - Ipswich
Recruitment hospital [6] 13891 0
Queensland Children's Hospital - South Brisbane
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 26659 0
4215 - Southport
Recruitment postcode(s) [2] 26660 0
4226 - Robina
Recruitment postcode(s) [3] 26661 0
4575 - Birtinya
Recruitment postcode(s) [4] 26662 0
4560 - Nambour
Recruitment postcode(s) [5] 26663 0
4305 - Ipswich
Recruitment postcode(s) [6] 26664 0
4101 - South Brisbane

Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1] 302936 0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Name [1] 302936 0
Emergency Medicine Foundation
Address [1] 302936 0
Suite 1b, Terraces, 19 Lang Parade Milton QLD 4064
Country [1] 302936 0
Australia
Funding source category [2] 304592 0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Name [2] 304592 0
Wishlist Sunshine Coast Hospital Foundation
Address [2] 304592 0
Sunshine Coast University Hospital
6 Doherty Street, Birtinya, Qld 4575
Country [2] 304592 0
Australia
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Name
Gold Coast University Hospital
Address
1 Hospital Bvld
Southport
Qld 4215
Country
Australia
Secondary sponsor category [1] 302897 0
University
Name [1] 302897 0
Griffith University
Address [1] 302897 0
Gold Coast campus Griffith University
G40 Griffith Health Centre
Level 8.86 Southport
QLD 4215 Australia
Country [1] 302897 0
Australia

Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Ethics committee name [1] 303498 0
Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee
Ethics committee address [1] 303498 0
Level 7, Centre for Children’s Health Research Queensland Children’s Hospital Precinct 62 Graham Street, South Brisbane QLD 4101
Ethics committee country [1] 303498 0
Australia
Date submitted for ethics approval [1] 303498 0
06/06/2019
Approval date [1] 303498 0
07/08/2019
Ethics approval number [1] 303498 0
HREC/19/QCHQ/53306

Summary
Brief summary
Children frequently present to the emergency department with forearm injuries and often have an x-ray to assess if there is a fracture. Due to the soft and plastic nature of the bones in young children, injuries can cause their bones to bend, known as a buckle fracture. Bedside ultrasound is a test that emergency practitioners can use to rapidly diagnose a fracture at the time of examination, without exposing children to ionising radiation. Ultrasound in this setting is well tolerated, only requiring light touch and gentle manipulation of the forearm and has similar accuracy when compared with x-rays for diagnosing children’s forearm fractures. This is the first trial to assess whether an x-ray is unnecessary when there is either a buckle fracture or no fracture seen on a portable ultrasound machine. This is important as they can be treated at the time of review without any further delay and will avoid these children being exposed to ionising radiation. Children will be randomised to receive either an ultrasound or x-ray for their forearm injury. Both groups will be followed up to see whether there are any differences in their recovery and to determine any complications. We will also determine the time and cost implications of this new approach, which could enable families to go home earlier and could be more cost-effective, with less x-rays being ordered. It is hypothesised that ultrasound is non-inferior to x-ray imaging for the diagnosis of paediatric distal forearm fractures and that it is cost-effective.
Trial website
Trial related presentations / publications
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 93870 0
Dr Peter James Snelling
Address 93870 0
Gold Coast University Hospital
Emergency Department
1 Hospital Blvd
Southport, Qld
4215
Country 93870 0
Australia
Phone 93870 0
+61 07 5687 0000
Fax 93870 0
Email 93870 0
peter.snelling@health.qld.gov.au
Contact person for public queries
Name 93871 0
Dr Peter James Snelling
Address 93871 0
Gold Coast University Hospital
Emergency Department
1 Hospital Blvd
Southport, Qld
4215
Country 93871 0
Australia
Phone 93871 0
+61 1300 744 284
Fax 93871 0
Email 93871 0
peter.snelling@health.qld.gov.au
Contact person for scientific queries
Name 93872 0
Dr Peter James Snelling
Address 93872 0
Gold Coast University Hospital
Emergency Department
1 Hospital Blvd
Southport, Qld
4215
Country 93872 0
Australia
Phone 93872 0
+61 1300 744 284
Fax 93872 0
Email 93872 0
peter.snelling@health.qld.gov.au

Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No other documents available
Summary results
No Results