Please note the ANZCTR will be unattended from Friday 20 December 2024 for the holidays. The Registry will re-open on Tuesday 7 January 2025. Submissions and updates will not be processed during that time.

Registering a new trial?

To achieve prospective registration, we recommend submitting your trial for registration at the same time as ethics submission.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial registered on ANZCTR


Registration number
ACTRN12618000603213
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
20/03/2018
Date registered
18/04/2018
Date last updated
6/05/2021
Date data sharing statement initially provided
14/01/2019
Type of registration
Prospectively registered

Titles & IDs
Public title
Efficacy of PIEZO ICSI to improve fertilisation rates of oocytes
Scientific title
Determining the effect of intracytoplasmic sperm injection using a Piezo ICSI technique on fertilisation rates of oocytes.
Secondary ID [1] 294394 0
Nil Known
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
PIEZO Trial
Linked study record
N/A

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Infertility 307122 0
Condition category
Condition code
Reproductive Health and Childbirth 306236 306236 0 0
Fertility including in vitro fertilisation

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
This trial is for the use of an alternative method for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using a Piezo ICSI machine. Piezo ICSI will be performed by trained senior embryologists at Repromed for our patients that have consented to partaking in the trial. The most common form of ICSI uses a bevelled spiked pipette to penetrate the zona pellucid where the cytoplasm is aspirated into the micropipette to break the membrane. After the membrane is broken the sperm is injected into the cytoplasm and the micropipette is withdrawn (termed conventional ICSI). In piezo-ICSI a piezoelectric actuator is used to move the capillary in an ultra rapid fashion by producing ultra-fast submicron motion which propels the capillary forward. The way this works is that the actuator is made of material that when a voltage is applied it changes shape and thus extrudes a force which moves the capillary in a forward jack hammer like motion. This technique is a more ‘gentle’ approach to the standard ICSI technique and therefore may improve outcomes as there is no bevel or spike on the pipette and may reduce the level of damage on the egg.

The duration of the sperm injection procedure depends on the number of eggs being injected however, the time spent per egg should not significantly differ from the standard. despite this the time for each egg injected will be recorded and compared to routine ICSI cases to ensure they are comparable. All injections will be undertaken by trial co-investigators.
Intervention code [1] 300687 0
Treatment: Devices
Comparator / control treatment
The control group will be patients that have insemination using the standard ICSI technique currently used. The most common form of ICSI uses a bevelled spiked pipette to penetrate the zona pellucid where the cytoplasm is aspirated into the micropipette to break the membrane. After the membrane is broken the sperm is injected into the cytoplasm and the micropipette is withdrawn (termed conventional ICSI). In addition prior to injection the sperm is immobilised using a striking technique. During this process the sperm flagellum is crushed by sliding the needle on the mid proportion of the flagellum until a kink is seen. The immobilisation technique is necessary to ensure leakage of cytosolic factors through the site of the damaged sperm membrane into the ooplasm which will hopefully facilitate commencement of the fertilisation process.
Control group
Active

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 305254 0
normal fertilisation rate. Fertilisation of oocytes will be assessed the morning after insemination. Normal fertilisation of an oocyte is assessed by the presence of 2 polar bodies and 2 pronuclei. This is visualised by a scientist under a microscope, no further tool or tests will be used or are applicable..
Timepoint [1] 305254 0
The day after injection when fertilisation can be assessed
Secondary outcome [1] 344645 0
oocyte degeneration rate. This is determined visually down a microscope by a scientist and is indicated by collapse of cytoplasmic membrane and degeneration of cytoplasm.
Timepoint [1] 344645 0
The day after injection when fertilisation can be assessed is single time-point to assess oocyte degeneration.
Secondary outcome [2] 344793 0
embryo quality. This is determined visually down a microscope by a scientist on day 3, 4, 5 and 6 of embryo culture.
Timepoint [2] 344793 0
A day 3 assessment is performed to track embryo development. A day 4/day 5 assessment is performed to assess suitability for transfer and /or day 5/day 6 assessment for embryos that are of a suitable quality to be frozen
Secondary outcome [3] 344795 0
Pregnancy rate.
Timepoint [3] 344795 0
This is determined by measuring the patients blood 16 days after egg collection for beta HCG level.
Secondary outcome [4] 344796 0
Fetal heart assessment
Timepoint [4] 344796 0
This is measured by ultrasound at between 6 to 8 weeks post egg collection.
Secondary outcome [5] 345646 0
Miscarriage rate
Timepoint [5] 345646 0
This is determined as the % of pregnancies that not determined to be on going after initial fetal heart scan at 6 to 8 weeks post egg collection.

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
All participants must be patients of Repromed who have booked on for IVF treatment where their clinician recommends ICSI as insemination method of choice.
Consenting patients must have greater than or equal to 6 mature oocytes for injection post egg retrieval.
Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
45 Years
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
Gamete donor cycles
Surgical sperm collection requirements
Previous cycle with an ICSI fertilisation of <30%

Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?



Intervention assignment
Parallel
Other design features
Phase
Not Applicable
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Statistical methods / analysis
Sixty-nine patient couples will be recruited by informed consent to participate in this trial to investigate the efficacy of the Piezo intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) technique as an alternative to standard ICSI. This number of participants has been calculated using a power analysis to detect a 10% increase in fertilisation rate. To adequately power the experiment to achieve the primary outcome of an increase in fertilisation rate, with a statistical significance level set at 0.05 and 90% power, a minimum of 418 oocytes will be required. If each patient has 6 oocytes then sixty-nine participants will be required maximum for enrolment to gain adequate data around the primary outcome.

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
SA
Recruitment hospital [1] 10424 0
Repromed Day Surgery - Dulwich
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 22117 0
5065 - Dulwich

Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1] 299029 0
Commercial sector/Industry
Name [1] 299029 0
Repromed
Country [1] 299029 0
Australia
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/Industry
Name
Repromed
Address
180 Fullarton Road Dulwich SA 5065
Country
Australia
Secondary sponsor category [1] 298254 0
None
Name [1] 298254 0
Address [1] 298254 0
Country [1] 298254 0

Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Ethics committee name [1] 299964 0
Women's and Children's Health Network (WCHN) Human Research Ethics Committee's (HREC)
Ethics committee address [1] 299964 0
Ethics committee country [1] 299964 0
Australia
Date submitted for ethics approval [1] 299964 0
18/04/2018
Approval date [1] 299964 0
11/09/2018
Ethics approval number [1] 299964 0
HREC/18/WCHN/46

Summary
Brief summary
Trial website
Trial related presentations / publications
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 82106 0
Dr Deirdre Zander-Fox
Address 82106 0
Repromed. 180 Fullarton Road Dulwich. South Australia. 5065
Country 82106 0
Australia
Phone 82106 0
+61 (08) 83338111
Fax 82106 0
+61 (08) 8333 8188
Email 82106 0
dzander@repromed.com.au
Contact person for public queries
Name 82107 0
Deirdre Zander-Fox
Address 82107 0
Repromed. 180 Fullarton Road Dulwich. South Australia. 5065
Country 82107 0
Australia
Phone 82107 0
+61 (08) 83338111
Fax 82107 0
+61 (08) 8333 8188
Email 82107 0
dzander@repromed.com.au
Contact person for scientific queries
Name 82108 0
Deirdre Zander-Fox
Address 82108 0
Repromed. 180 Fullarton Road Dulwich. South Australia. 5065
Country 82108 0
Australia
Phone 82108 0
+61 (08) 83338111
Fax 82108 0
+61 (08) 8333 8188
Email 82108 0
dzander@repromed.com.au

Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
there is no plan to make IPD available


What supporting documents are/will be available?

No Supporting Document Provided



Results publications and other study-related documents

Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.

Documents added automatically
SourceTitleYear of PublicationDOI
EmbasePIEZO-ICSI increases fertilization rates compared with standard ICSI: a prospective cohort study.2021https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.05.020
N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.