ANZCTR - Registration

Please note the ANZCTR will be unattended from Friday 20 December 2024 for the holidays. The Registry will re-open on Tuesday 7 January 2025. Submissions and updates will not be processed during that time.

Registering a new trial?

To achieve prospective registration, we recommend submitting your trial for registration at the same time as ethics submission.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers

Trial registered on ANZCTR

Registration number

ACTRN12618000817246

Ethics application status

Approved

Date submitted

9/05/2018

Date registered

11/05/2018

Date last updated

9/07/2021

Date data sharing statement initially provided

12/02/2019

Type of registration

Prospectively registered

Titles & IDs

Public title

Does Soft Tissue Balancing Using Intra-Operative Pressure Sensors Improve Clinical Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Multi-Centre Randomised Controlled Trial

Scientific title

Does Soft Tissue Balancing Using Intra-Operative Pressure Sensors Improve Clinical Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Multi-Centre Randomised Controlled Trial

Secondary ID [1]

None

Universal Trial Number (UTN)

U1111-1205-9703

Trial acronym

Linked study record

Health condition

Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:

Osteoarthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis

Condition category

Condition code

Musculoskeletal

Osteoarthritis

Musculoskeletal

Other muscular and skeletal disorders

Surgery

Surgical techniques

Intervention/exposure

Study type

Interventional

Description of intervention(s) / exposure

During routine TKA surgery, readings from a Verasense pressure sensor will be recorded, and then used to guide soft-tissue balancing of the knee. The Verasense device is a sterile, single-use sensor that is temporarily inserted in the compartment between the femoral and tibial implant components during surgery. It will be in situ for 5-10 minutes, depending on the adjustments required to achieve a balanced knee state. Micro-electronic elements calculate the compartment pressure loads as the knee is bent and straightened out. The orthopaedic surgeon will be administering the intervention.
A non-surgical team member present at all cases will record intra-operative data and will sign the surgical data form to verify fidelity to the study. In addition, random surgical visitations to research sites by the Principal Investigator and Study Coordinator will be undertaken to monitor and document strict adherence to study protocol.

Intervention code [1]

Treatment: Surgery

Intervention code [2]

Treatment: Devices

Comparator / control treatment

During routine TKA surgery, readings from a Verasense pressure sensor will be recorded, but the surgeon will be blinded to those data, and will manually balance the soft tissues of the knee. All intra-operative Verasense data will be recorded on the surgical data form by the company prosthetic representative who normally operates the Verasense monitor during surgical procedures. Each representative will undergo specific training on data collection, blinding and recording requirements.

Control group

Active

Outcomes

Primary outcome [1]

Change in the average score of the four subscales of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) that are most specific to recovery after total knee arthroplasty: pain, symptoms, function in daily living and knee-related quality of life.

Timepoint [1]

1 year-2 weeks pre-operatively and 1-year post-operatively

Secondary outcome [1]

Mean change in composite patient-reported levels of pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sport/recreation and knee-related quality of life as measured by all five subscales on the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)

Timepoint [1]

1 year-2 weeks pre-operatively, 6 months post-operatively, 2 years post-operatively

Secondary outcome [2]

Change in composite patient-reported outcomes on the Knee Society Score (2011) - symptoms, satisfactions, expectations and function

Timepoint [2]

1 year-2 weeks pre-operatively, 1 year post-operatively, 2 years post-operatively

Secondary outcome [3]

Change in patient-reported overall awareness of knee joint as measured by the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12)

Timepoint [3]

1 year-2 weeks pre-operatively, 1 year post-operatively, 2 years post-operatively

Secondary outcome [4]

Patient-reported overall health status as measured by the EQ5D-5L score

Timepoint [4]

1 year-2 weeks pre-operatively, 1 year post-operatively, 2 years post-operatively

Secondary outcome [5]

Tibiofemoral compartmental pressure loads as measured by Verasense pressure monitor (initial and final medial and lateral readings at 10 degrees, 45 degrees and 90 degrees of flexion)

Timepoint [5]

Intra-operatively

Secondary outcome [6]

Tibiofemoral match as measured by rotation of tibia at 10 degrees, 45 degrees and 90 degrees of flexion

Timepoint [6]

Intra-operatively

Secondary outcome [7]

Functional outcome: Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)

Timepoint [7]

6 months post-operatively

Secondary outcome [8]

Functional outcome: Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)

Timepoint [8]

6 months post-operatively

Secondary outcome [9]

Surgeon determination of knee balance with pressure sensor in situ. Prior to performing knee balancing (for both the intervention and control groups), the screen with pressure values will be turned away from the surgeon. The surgeon will be asked if the knee is balanced or unbalanced at 10, 45 and 90 degrees of flexion: Balanced? Yes or No. Agreement is defined as two out of three flexion positions.

Timepoint [9]

Intra-operatively

Secondary outcome [10]

Functional outcome: Knee range of motion (maximal passive extension and maximal passive flexion) using a goniometer

Timepoint [10]

6-10 weeks post-operatively and 6 months post-operatively

Secondary outcome [11]

Perth CT Protocol - objective assessment of the alignment of components in TKA (mechanical angle, AP femorotibial axis, femoral coronal angle, tibial coronal angle, femoral flexion, tibial slope, femoral rotation, femorotibial match, tuberosity lateralisation, Berger tibial rotation)

Timepoint [11]

Assessed at a single time point prior to discharge from hospital after index surgery

Secondary outcome [12]

Assessment of native lower limb anatomy for pre-operative templating and overall surgical planning using routine radiographs (AP erect, 30-degree lateral and patellar skyline views and four-foot films)

Timepoint [12]

Within one year pre-operatively

Secondary outcome [13]

Implant positioning as assessed by routine radiographs (AP erect, 30-degree lateral and patellar skyline views)

Timepoint [13]

Immediately post-operatively, 1 year post-operatively, 2 years post-operatively

Secondary outcome [14]

In-hospital data:
Readiness for discharge as determined by treating physiotherapist (measured by the following criteria: pain controlled with oral medication; able to get in and out of bed and to toilet without assistance; able to mobilise safely and independently; able to mobilise safely on steps); and as determined medically fit for discharge by hospital medical staff

Timepoint [14]

Prior to participant discharge

Secondary outcome [15]

In-hospital data:
Total length of stay, as determined by hospital medical records (day of discharge minus day of admission)

Timepoint [15]

Within one month post-discharge

Secondary outcome [16]

In-hospital data:
Discharge destination, as determined by hospital medical records and as defined by one of the following options: home; in-patient rehabilitation unit; nursing home facility

Timepoint [16]

Within one month post-discharge

Eligibility

Key inclusion criteria

1. All patients suitable for TKA aged 20-85 years
2. Patients who meet the indications for a primary unilateral or bilateral total knee arthroplasty using the Smith & Nephew Legion or Genesis II cruciate-retaining or posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty system
3. Subjects diagnosed with one or more of the following conditions: osteoarthritis; rheumatoid or other inflammatory arthritis; post-traumatic osteoarthritis

Minimum age

20 Years

Maximum age

85 Years

Sex

Both males and females

Can healthy volunteers participate?

Key exclusion criteria

1. Any surgery where increased prosthetic constraint will be required due to significant ligament deficiencies (such as constrained condylar or rotating hinge prostheses)
2. Any surgery performed for acute fracture or tumour involvement
3. Participants unable to provide consent or complete questionnaires due to cognitive incapacity or English language deficit
4. Participants unable to commit to full follow-up schedule over two years (due to geographic distance or physical challenges)
5. Pregnant female, or planning on becoming pregnant during study period

Study design

Purpose of the study

Treatment

Allocation to intervention

Randomised controlled trial

Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)

Centralised computer-based randomisation service by phone. Allocation will take place immediately prior to commencement of surgery.

Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)

Participants will be randomised using minimisation by the randomisation service. Patient age, surgeon and gender will be included in the minimisation. For those patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral TKA or sequential unilateral TKA at different time points during the trial, both knees will be allocated to the same arm: randomisation is done at the level of the patient, not the knee.

Masking / blinding

Blinded (masking used)

Who is / are masked / blinded?

The people receiving the treatment/s

The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data

Intervention assignment

Parallel

Other design features

Phase

Not Applicable

Type of endpoint/s

Efficacy

Statistical methods / analysis

The primary outcome for this study will be the average of the four subscales of the KOOS at 12 months. Normality of data distribution will be assessed, and Student's T test will be used to compare differences in means with continuous variables. The chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test will be used for categorical data analysis as appropriate. Intention-to-treat analysis will be performed in the primary analysis. In addition, an as-treated analysis including participants according to treatment received will also be added as a secondary analysis. If greater than 20% of data are missing from the randomised sample, the missing data will be imputed. However, attempts will be made to minimise missing data by contacting patients directly by phone or via mail follow-up.

Recruitment

Recruitment status

Completed

Date of first participant enrolment

Anticipated

15/06/2018

Actual

3/10/2018

Date of last participant enrolment

Anticipated

15/03/2019

Actual

1/04/2019

Date of last data collection

Anticipated

15/03/2021

Actual

20/05/2021

Sample size

Target

222

Accrual to date

Final

250

Recruitment in Australia

Recruitment state(s)

ACT,NSW,TAS

Recruitment hospital [1]

St George Private Hospital - Kogarah

Recruitment hospital [2]

Canterbury Hospital - Campsie

Recruitment hospital [3]

Wollongong Hospital - Wollongong

Recruitment hospital [4]

Kareena Private Hospital - Caringbah

Recruitment hospital [5]

The Sutherland Hospital - Caringbah

Recruitment hospital [6]

Sydney Southwest Private Hospital - Liverpool

Recruitment hospital [7]

Fairfield Hospital - Prairiewood

Recruitment hospital [8]

Calvary Public Hospital ACT - Bruce

Recruitment hospital [9]

Calvary John James Hospital - Deakin

Recruitment hospital [10]

Calvary Health Care Tasmania - Launceston campus - Launceston

Recruitment hospital [11]

Canberra Private Hospital - Deakin

Recruitment postcode(s) [1]

2217 - Kogarah

Recruitment postcode(s) [2]

2194 - Campsie

Recruitment postcode(s) [3]

2500 - Wollongong

Recruitment postcode(s) [4]

2229 - Caringbah

Recruitment postcode(s) [5]

2170 - Liverpool

Recruitment postcode(s) [6]

2176 - Prairiewood

Recruitment postcode(s) [7]

2617 - Bruce

Recruitment postcode(s) [8]

2600 - Deakin

Recruitment postcode(s) [9]

7250 - Launceston

Funding & Sponsors

Funding source category [1]

Commercial sector/Industry

Name [1]

OrthoSensor

Address [1]

1855 Griffin Road, Suite A-310
Dania Beach, FL 33004

Country [1]

United States of America

Funding source category [2]

Commercial sector/Industry

Name [2]

Smith & Nephew, Pty Ltd.

Address [2]

1450 Brooks Road
Memphis, TN 38116

Country [2]

United States of America

Primary sponsor type

Individual

Name

Dr Samuel Macdessi

Address

Sydney Knee Specialists
Suite 8, Level 3
19 Kensington Street
Kogarah, NSW 2217

Country

Australia

Secondary sponsor category [1]

None

Name [1]

Address [1]

Country [1]

Ethics approval

Ethics application status

Approved

Ethics committee name [1]

South Eastern Sydney Local Health District HREC

Ethics committee address [1]

Room G71 East Wing
Edmund Blacket Building
Prince of Wales Hospital
Randwick, NSW 2031

Ethics committee country [1]

Australia

Date submitted for ethics approval [1]

22/05/2018

Approval date [1]

03/08/2018

Ethics approval number [1]

18/135 (HREC/18/POWH/320)

Summary

Brief summary

 Total knee arthroplasty (TKA), or total knee replacement surgery, is a successful operation in alleviating pain and improving function for the majority of people with end-stage knee osteoarthritis. However, up to 20% of patients undergoing TKA report some dissatisfaction following their surgery. Dissatisfaction after TKA is multi-factorial, but the surgical causes are commonly related to imbalance of the ligaments (soft tissues) that surround the knee at the time of surgery or slight malalignment of the upper and lower leg bones.
 Current thinking in the field of total knee replacement centres around optimising the balance of the ligaments as the prostheses are implanted, because it is generally agreed that this equilibrium is associated with the best outcomes for patients. Traditionally, surgeons have decided whether a knee is balanced during surgery by using their experience to manually assess the feel of the joint. Other methods used to balance the knee have involved measuring the space between the femur (thigh bone) and tibia (shin bone) based on ligament tensioning and using computer navigation to assess the stresses across the joint. 
 Since the introduction of wireless sensor technology, surgeons have another tool to measure soft tissue balance and the ways in which the bones move against each other. Intra-operative pressure sensors use micro-electronics to calculate pressure loads in the compartment between the femur and tibia as the knee is bent and straightened out. Surgeons can use this information to appropriately align the implants for optimum balance.
 The intra-operative device used in this study is called the Verasense pressure monitor, and it is used by some surgeons in knee replacements operations outside this study.
 It is important to state that there has been no rigorous research to date that shows an association between using the Verasense device and better outcomes such as less pain, more function and overall satisfaction. The aim of this study is to investigate whether there are such benefits to using intra-operative sensors to achieve balance.
 Participants will be randomly assigned to either a manual balancing (MB) group or a sensor-guided balancing (SGB) group. For patients in the MB group, surgeons will use standard methods to achieve soft tissue balance. For patients in the SGB group, surgeons will use readings from the Verasense device to achieve soft tissue balance. 
 Participants will be followed closely over the course of two years to monitor the progress in each group. The results of this trial will aim to inform future clinical practice with regard to soft-tissue balance and alignment in total knee arthroplasty

Trial website

N/A

Trial related presentations / publications

N/A

Public notes

Contacts

Principal investigator

Name

Dr Samuel Macdessi

Address

Sydney Knee Specialists, Suite 201, Level 2, 131 Princes Highway, Kogarah, NSW 2217

Country

Australia

Phone

+61 2 8307 0333

Fax

+61 2 8307 0334

samuelmacdessi@sydneyknee.com.au

Contact person for public queries

Name

Jil Wood, Clinical Research Manager

Address

Sydney Knee Specialists, Suite 201, Level 2, 131 Princes Highway, Kogarah, NSW 2217

Country

Australia

Phone

+61 2 8307 0333

Fax

+61 2 8307 0334

jil@sydneyknee.com.au

Contact person for scientific queries

Name

Samuel Macdessi

Address

Sydney Knee Specialists, Suite 201, Level 2, 131 Princes Highway, Kogarah, NSW 2217

Country

Australia

Phone

+61 2 8307 0333

Fax

+61 2 8307 0334

samuelmacdessi@sydneyknee.com.au

Data sharing statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?

Yes

What data in particular will be shared?

Individual participant data underlying published results, after de-identification

When will data be available (start and end dates)?

Beginning 6 months after publication and no end date determined

Available to whom?

Case-by-case basis at the discretion of Principal Investigator

Available for what types of analyses?

Systematic review, including IPD meta-analyses

How or where can data be obtained?

Access subject to approval by Principal Investigator with requirement to sign data access agreement

What supporting documents are/will be available?

Doc. No.	Type	Citation	Link	Email	Other Details	Attachment
1324	Study protocol					374082-(Uploaded-07-02-2019-17-19-57)-Study-related document.pdf

Results publications and other study-related documents

Documents added manually

No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.

Documents added automatically

Source	Title	Year of Publication	DOI
Embase	Does soft tissue balancing using intraoperative pressure sensors improve clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty? A protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.	2019	https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027812
Embase	Surgeon-defined assessment is a poor predictor of knee balance in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, multicenter study.	2021	https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-05925-6
Embase	Intraoperative pressure sensors improve soft-tissue balance but not clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre randomized controlled trial.	2022	https://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.104B5.BJJ-2021-1299.R2

N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.

Trial Review

Registering a new trial?

Documents added manually

Documents added automatically