ANZCTR - Registration

Please note the ANZCTR will be unattended from Friday 20 December 2024 for the holidays. The Registry will re-open on Tuesday 7 January 2025. Submissions and updates will not be processed during that time.

Registering a new trial?

To achieve prospective registration, we recommend submitting your trial for registration at the same time as ethics submission.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers

Trial registered on ANZCTR

Registration number

ACTRN12615000298516

Ethics application status

Approved

Date submitted

13/03/2015

Date registered

31/03/2015

Date last updated

27/02/2017

Type of registration

Prospectively registered

Titles & IDs

Public title

The implementation of "Goals of Patient Care" medical treatment orders in residential aged care facilities

Scientific title

The effect of Goals of Patient Care medical treatment orders on residents', in residential aged care facilities, emergency department reviews and admissions six months post intervention

Secondary ID [1]

nil

Universal Trial Number (UTN)

Trial acronym

Linked study record

Health condition

Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:

Advance Care Planning for frail older aged care residents

Palliation for frail older aged care residents

Condition category

Condition code

Other

Research that is not of generic health relevance and not applicable to specific health categories listed above

Intervention/exposure

Study type

Interventional

Description of intervention(s) / exposure

The residential aged care facility “Goals of Patient Care” form is a medical treatment order based on the patients
advance care plan or wishes. This serves as a communication tool for staff in the aged care facility, visiting doctors
(regular or locum GPs), ambulance staff and emergency department staff. The form helps guide medical decisions
made on behalf of the resident in both planned and emergency situations.

Intervention code [1]

Treatment: Other

Comparator / control treatment

Usual care which may or may not include an advance care plan

Control group

Active

Outcomes

Primary outcome [1]

The effect of the Goals of Patient Care medical treatment orders on Emergency Department reviews and admissions.
The event rate will be the number of emergency department reviews or admissions per number of facility beds over a six month period. This will be compared 6 months pre and post the intervention. It will be calculated by both recording these reviews and admissions at the facility and checking the local hospital records.

Timepoint [1]

The primary timepoint will be the difference between six months pre and six months post the intervention.

Secondary outcome [1]

The effect of the Goals of Patient Care medical treatment orders on Emergency Department reviews and admissions.
The event rate will be the number of emergency department reviews or admissions per number of facility beds over both a 3 and 12 month period. This will be compared with 3 and 12 months pre and post the intervention respectively. It will be calculated by both recording at the facility and check the local hospital records.

Timepoint [1]

At three and twelve months post the intervention compared with three and twelve months pre the intervention

Secondary outcome [2]

Overall acute healthcare utilisation including outpatient reviews and lenghts of stay and associated costs per hospital review and stay. This will be calculated from health records at the facility and local hospitals.

Timepoint [2]

6 and 12 months post intervention compared with 6 and 12 months pre intervention respectively

Secondary outcome [3]

Changes in communication of residents' healthcare wishes which will be recorded from qualatative analysis of focus groups and individual interviews

Timepoint [3]

6 and 12 months post intervention

Secondary outcome [4]

Changes in how easy or difficult it is to make healthcare decisions on behalf of residents which will be recorded from qualatative analysis of focus groups and individual interviews

Timepoint [4]

6 and 12 months post intervention

Secondary outcome [5]

Change in levels of conflict between RACF staff, visiting healthcare professionals, residents and families which will be recorded from qualatative analysis of focus groups and individual interviews

Timepoint [5]

6 and 12 months post intervention

Eligibility

Key inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria is all residents in the involved residential aged care facilities

Minimum age

55 Years

Maximum age

No limit

Sex

Both males and females

Can healthy volunteers participate?

Key exclusion criteria

Residents for whom consent cannot be obtained from either themselves or their Person Responsible

Study design

Purpose of the study

Treatment

Allocation to intervention

Randomised controlled trial

Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)

Invitation to local residential aged care facilities be email.
Follow up meeting with management to explain project.
Aim for at least 8 residential aged care facilities to sign consent to take part.
Cluster pairs based on baseline characteristics of facility and their previous 6 month even rate ( with the event rate being ED review or admission/6 months/number of residents
Facilities will be blinded to the random allocation prior to agreeing to participate. Residents will then be invited individually to fill written informed consent to partake.
Allocation is not concealed.

Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)

Randomisation will be undertaken using the add-in random allocation program ‘ralloc’ available in Stata version 12.1 (StataCorp LP, Texas, USA).

Masking / blinding

Open (masking not used)

Who is / are masked / blinded?

Intervention assignment

Parallel

Other design features

Phase

Not Applicable

Type of endpoint/s

Efficacy

Statistical methods / analysis

Qualitative data analysis
1 A focus group/interview schedule will be used and moderated by the principal researcher and an associate researcher trained in qualitative method
2 Focus groups and interviews will be audio recorded and transcribed verbatim.
3 Focus groups will be repeated until saturation of themes has been reached, it is anticipated that saturation will be achieved by three focus groups
4 The transcribed focus group and individual interviews will be analysed thematically, using open and axial coding
Quantitative data analysis
1 Descriptive statistics will be used to compare healthcare utilisation rates and other secondary outcomes between the intervention and the control arms at three, six and twelve months
2 Multi-level Poisson regression models will be established to account for the intra-class correlation within each RACF when assessing the primary outcome of health care utilisation rates.
3 Chi-square and appropriate parametric and non-parametric continuous data statistical tests will be used to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention for the secondary outcomes
4 Descriptive statistics will also be presented at baseline to illustrate the consistency of health care utilisation between the intervention and control arms

On calculation for INDIVIDUAL randomisation for this study, n = 157 persons per period for each arm given a significance of 0.05 and 80% power.
For CLUSTER randomisation the calculation is then made with a given an anticipated event rate of 0.5 (emergency reviews or admissions/6months/facility bed) from prior studies, in control and 0.3 in intervention facilities and assumed intra-cluster correlation (p), from prior community studies, which is a combination of within cluster variance, of 0.01 the estimated number of clusters required per intervention and control strata is 3.5. On testing feasibility of 3 clusters, it was found to be feasible if the number of clusters (k) was greater than n (157) x p (0.011). We intend to start with 3 cluster pairs and test interim statistical analysis at 6 months and add a 4th cluster pair if required to gain statistical significance.
In 3 pairs of facilities we expect to have 400 residents.

Recruitment

Recruitment status

Completed

Date of first participant enrolment

Anticipated

4/05/2015

Actual

2/07/2015

Date of last participant enrolment

Anticipated

29/10/2015

Actual

29/10/2015

Date of last data collection

Anticipated

Actual

1/12/2016

Sample size

Target

400

Accrual to date

Final

333

Recruitment in Australia

Recruitment state(s)

VIC

Recruitment hospital [1]

The Northern Hospital - Epping

Recruitment postcode(s) [1]

3076 - Epping

Funding & Sponsors

Funding source category [1]

Charities/Societies/Foundations

Name [1]

The Northern Health Foundation

Address [1]

The Northern Health Foundation, 185 Cooper Street, Epping, VIC 3076

Country [1]

Australia

Primary sponsor type

Hospital

Name

Northern Health

Address

The Northen Hospital, 185 Cooper Street, Epping, VIC 3076

Country

Australia

Secondary sponsor category [1]

None

Name [1]

Address [1]

Country [1]

Ethics approval

Ethics application status

Approved

Ethics committee name [1]

The Northern Health Human Research Ethics Committee

Ethics committee address [1]

The Northern Hospital, 185 Cooper Street, Epping, VIC 3076

Ethics committee country [1]

Australia

Date submitted for ethics approval [1]

23/03/2015

Approval date [1]

29/05/2015

Ethics approval number [1]

HREC/15/NH/6

Summary

Brief summary

Residents in aged care facilities are often the frailest in our society. They regularly have issues with cognition which can hinder their decision making capacity and which deteriorates over time. Residents or substitute medical decision-makers (Persons Responsible) often complete advance care plans to help inform future medical decisions in case of clinical deterioration.
The residential aged care facility “Goals of Patient Care” form is a medical treatment order based on the patients advance care plan or wishes. This serves as a communication tool for staff in the aged care facility, visiting doctors (regular or locum GPs), ambulance staff and emergency department staff. The form helps guide healthcare decisions made on behalf of the resident in both planned and emergency situations. The form is filled in with the resident, or substitute medical decision maker, if the patient is unable due to presence of dementia. Residents’ GPs will be invited to be involved in the process also.
We intend to implement the form in 3-4 pairs of residential aged care facilities. In each pair will be one facility using the intervention and one not using it. We will compare outcomes in both the intervention facilities (using the medical treatment order) and the control facilities (not using the medical treatment order). This comparison will look at residents’ usage of hospital services, including emergency reviews, emergency admissions, length of stay and outpatient reviews, to see the effect “Goals of Patient Care” has on these.
We will also gather baseline characteristics on all residents involved including their previous 12 month hospital usage. We will investigate the uptake of the “Goals of Patient Care” form, ability of the residents to make healthcare decisions, presence of dementia without diagnosis in the residents, and death and place of death of residents. Our qualitative outcomes will include improvements in communication, ease of medical decision making and effect on conflict.
We will gather data up to 12 months after the implementation of the form. We will survey the healthcare workers prior to implementation, and organise focus groups and brief interviews to investigate our qualitative outcomes with the healthcare providers involved at 6 and 12 months.

Trial website

Nil

Trial related presentations / publications

Public notes

Contacts

Principal investigator

Name

Dr Ruth Martin

Address

Clinical Services Medicine, The Northern Hospital, 185 Cooper Street, Epping, VIC 3076, Australia

Country

Australia

Phone

+61 3 84052463

Fax

ruth.martin@nh.org.au

Contact person for public queries

Name

Ruth Martin

Address

Clinical Services Medicine, The Northern Hospital, 185 Cooper Street, Epping, VIC 3076, Australia

Country

Australia

Phone

+61 3 84052463

Fax

ruth.martin@nh.org.au

Contact person for scientific queries

Name

Dr Ruth Martin

Address

Clinical Services Medicine, The Northern Hospital, 185 Cooper Street, Epping, VIC 3076, Australia

Country

Australia

Phone

+61 3 84052463

Fax

ruth.martin@nh.org.au

No information has been provided regarding IPD availability

What supporting documents are/will be available?

No Supporting Document Provided

Results publications and other study-related documents

Documents added manually

No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.

Documents added automatically

Source	Title	Year of Publication	DOI
Embase	Introducing Goals of Patient Care in Residential Aged Care Facilities to Decrease Hospitalization: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.	2019	https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2019.06.017

N.B. These documents automatically identified may not have been verified by the study sponsor.

Trial Review

Registering a new trial?

Documents added manually

Documents added automatically