The ANZCTR website is back online for trial registration and updates. We apologise for any inconvenience caused while the site was inactive.


With activity expected to increase on the ANZCTR again, there may be extended wait times while we process pending studies, with priority being given to those trials submitted in February. Thank you for your patience.


Reset your password and enable multi-factor authentication (MFA)


For ANZCTR account holders: to help ensure the cyber safety of your account, you’ll need to reset your password and set-up multi-factor authentication (MFA) as per the instructions below.


  1. Go to the Login page, click ‘reset password’ and follow the instructions.
  2. Check your email for the link to set a new password.
  3. Create a new password that meets requirements.
  4. Return to the Login page and enter your new password. A verification code will be sent to your email.
  5. Check your email for the code and enter it on the Login page. If the code is entered incorrectly, you can re-enter the correct one or request a new one.

Learn more about MFA and its importance on the Australian Signals Directorate website.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov

For full trial details, please see the original record at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01128894




Registration number
NCT01128894
Ethics application status
Date submitted
29/04/2010
Date registered
24/05/2010

Titles & IDs
Public title
A Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Albiglutide as Compared With Liraglutide.
Scientific title
A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Albiglutide as Compared With Liraglutide in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Secondary ID [1] 0 0
114179
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 0 0
Condition category
Condition code
Metabolic and Endocrine 0 0 0 0
Diabetes

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Other - albiglutide
Treatment: Drugs - liraglutide

Experimental: albiglutide - weekly albiglutide subcutaneous injection

Active comparator: liraglutide - liraglutide daily subcutaneous injection, starting at 0.6mg, then up-titrating to 1.2mg then 1.8mg in accordance with prescribing information.


Treatment: Other: albiglutide
albiglutide weekly subcutaneous injection

Treatment: Drugs: liraglutide
liraglutide daily subcutaneous injection, starting at 0.6mg, then up-titrating to 1.2mg then 1.8mg in accordance with prescribing information.

Intervention code [1] 0 0
Treatment: Other
Intervention code [2] 0 0
Treatment: Drugs
Comparator / control treatment
Control group

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 0 0
Mean Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 32
Assessment method [1] 0 0
HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline in HbA1c was calculated as the value at Week 32 minus the value at Baseline. The analysis was performed using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, region, history of prior myocardial infarction (yes versus no), and age category (\<65 years versus =65 years) as factors and Baseline HbA1c as a continuous covariate. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing.
Timepoint [1] 0 0
Baseline and Week 32
Secondary outcome [1] 0 0
Mean Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 4, 6, 12, 18 and 26
Assessment method [1] 0 0
HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. Participants were considered in the treatment week if they had received at least one dose in that treatment week.
Timepoint [1] 0 0
Baseline, Weeks 4, 6, 12, 18 and 26
Secondary outcome [2] 0 0
Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 32
Assessment method [2] 0 0
The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the value at Baseline. The analysis was performed using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, region, Baseline HbA1c category, history of prior myocardial infarction (yes versus no), and age category (\<65 years versus =65 years) as factors and Baseline FPG as a continuous covariate. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. Participants were considered in the treatment week if they had received at least one dose in that treatment week.
Timepoint [2] 0 0
Baseline and Week 32
Secondary outcome [3] 0 0
Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 26
Assessment method [3] 0 0
The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the value at Baseline. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. Participants were considered in the treatment week if they had received at least one dose in that treatment week.
Timepoint [3] 0 0
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12, 18 and 26
Secondary outcome [4] 0 0
Number of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c Response Level of <6.5% and <7.0% at Week 32
Assessment method [4] 0 0
Number of participants who achieved HbA1c response levels of \<6.5% and \<7.0% at Week 32 were assessed. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing.
Timepoint [4] 0 0
Week 32
Secondary outcome [5] 0 0
Time to Hyperglycemia Rescue at Week 32
Assessment method [5] 0 0
Participants who experienced persistent hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) could have qualified for hyperglycemia rescue. The conditions for hyperglycemia rescue were as follows: fasting plasma glucose (FPG) \>=280 milligram/decilitre (mg/dL) \>= Week 2 and \< Week 4, FPG \>=250 mg/dL \>= Week 4 and \= Week 12 and \= Week 26. Time to hyperglycemia rescue is defined as the time between the date of the first dose of study medication and the date of hyperglycemia rescue plus one day, or the time between the date of the first dose of study medication and the date of the last visit during the active treatment period plus one day for participants not requiring rescue. This time was divided by 7 to express the result in weeks. All times extending beyond Week 32 relevant to hyperglycemia rescue were censored at Week 32.
Timepoint [5] 0 0
Week 32
Secondary outcome [6] 0 0
Mean Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 32
Assessment method [6] 0 0
The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Week 32 minus the value at Baseline. The analysis was performed using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, region, Baseline HbA1c category, history of prior myocardial infarction (yes versus no), and age category (\<65 years versus =65 years) as factors and Baseline weight as a continuous covariate. The LOCF method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. If a participant had missing observation(s) immediately after Baseline, the Baseline observation was not carried forward and was left as missing. Weight values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with pre-rescue values.
Timepoint [6] 0 0
Baseline and Week 32

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus and experiencing inadequate glycemic control on their current regimen of metformin, TZD, SU, or any combination of these oral antidiabetic medications
* BMI >/=20kg/m2 and </=45 kg/m2
* Fasting C-peptide >/=0.8 ng/mL (>/=0.26 nmol/L)
* HbA1c between 7.0% and 10.0%, inclusive
* Female subjects of childbearing potential must be practicing adequate contraception.
Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
No limit
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
* History of cancer
* History of treated diabetic gastroparesis
* Current biliary disease or history of pancreatitis
* History of significant GI surgery
* Recent clinically significant cardiovascular and/or cerebrovascular disease
* Hypertension
* History of human immunodeficiency virus infection
* History of or current liver disease or acute symptomatic infection with hepatitis B or hepatitis C
* History of alcohol or substance abuse
* Female subject is pregnant, lactating, or <6 weeks postpartum
* Known allergy to any GLP 1 analogue, liraglutide, other study medications' excipients, excipients of albiglutide, or Baker's yeast
* History of type 1 diabetes mellitus
* Contraindications (as per the prescribing information) for the use of either background or potential randomized study medications (e.g., liraglutide)
* Receipt of any investigational drug or liraglutide within the 30 days or 5 half lives, whichever is longer, before Screening or a history of receipt of an investigational antidiabetic drug within the 3 months before randomization or receipt of albiglutide in previous studies
* History or family history of thyroid disease

Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?



Intervention assignment
Parallel
Other design features
Phase
Phase 3
Type of endpoint/s
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Data analysis
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
ACT,NSW,QLD,VIC,WA
Recruitment hospital [1] 0 0
GSK Investigational Site - Garran
Recruitment hospital [2] 0 0
GSK Investigational Site - Camperdown
Recruitment hospital [3] 0 0
GSK Investigational Site - St Leonards
Recruitment hospital [4] 0 0
GSK Investigational Site - Herston
Recruitment hospital [5] 0 0
GSK Investigational Site - Box Hill
Recruitment hospital [6] 0 0
GSK Investigational Site - Geelong
Recruitment hospital [7] 0 0
GSK Investigational Site - Heidelberg
Recruitment hospital [8] 0 0
GSK Investigational Site - Ringwood East
Recruitment hospital [9] 0 0
GSK Investigational Site - Fremantle
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 0 0
2606 - Garran
Recruitment postcode(s) [2] 0 0
2050 - Camperdown
Recruitment postcode(s) [3] 0 0
2065 - St Leonards
Recruitment postcode(s) [4] 0 0
4029 - Herston
Recruitment postcode(s) [5] 0 0
3128 - Box Hill
Recruitment postcode(s) [6] 0 0
3220 - Geelong
Recruitment postcode(s) [7] 0 0
3081 - Heidelberg
Recruitment postcode(s) [8] 0 0
3135 - Ringwood East
Recruitment postcode(s) [9] 0 0
6160 - Fremantle
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [1] 0 0
Alabama
Country [2] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [2] 0 0
Arizona
Country [3] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [3] 0 0
Arkansas
Country [4] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [4] 0 0
California
Country [5] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [5] 0 0
Florida
Country [6] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [6] 0 0
Georgia
Country [7] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [7] 0 0
Hawaii
Country [8] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [8] 0 0
Idaho
Country [9] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [9] 0 0
Illinois
Country [10] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [10] 0 0
Indiana
Country [11] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [11] 0 0
Iowa
Country [12] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [12] 0 0
Kentucky
Country [13] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [13] 0 0
Louisiana
Country [14] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [14] 0 0
Massachusetts
Country [15] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [15] 0 0
Michigan
Country [16] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [16] 0 0
Minnesota
Country [17] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [17] 0 0
Mississippi
Country [18] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [18] 0 0
Missouri
Country [19] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [19] 0 0
Nebraska
Country [20] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [20] 0 0
Nevada
Country [21] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [21] 0 0
New Jersey
Country [22] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [22] 0 0
New York
Country [23] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [23] 0 0
North Carolina
Country [24] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [24] 0 0
Ohio
Country [25] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [25] 0 0
Oklahoma
Country [26] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [26] 0 0
Oregon
Country [27] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [27] 0 0
Pennsylvania
Country [28] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [28] 0 0
South Carolina
Country [29] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [29] 0 0
Tennessee
Country [30] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [30] 0 0
Texas
Country [31] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [31] 0 0
Utah
Country [32] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [32] 0 0
Vermont
Country [33] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [33] 0 0
Virginia
Country [34] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [34] 0 0
Washington
Country [35] 0 0
Israel
State/province [35] 0 0
Beer-Sheva
Country [36] 0 0
Israel
State/province [36] 0 0
Haifa
Country [37] 0 0
Israel
State/province [37] 0 0
Kfar Saba
Country [38] 0 0
Israel
State/province [38] 0 0
Nahariya
Country [39] 0 0
Korea, Republic of
State/province [39] 0 0
Goyang
Country [40] 0 0
Korea, Republic of
State/province [40] 0 0
Seongnam-si,
Country [41] 0 0
Korea, Republic of
State/province [41] 0 0
Seongnam-si
Country [42] 0 0
Korea, Republic of
State/province [42] 0 0
Seoul
Country [43] 0 0
Peru
State/province [43] 0 0
Lima
Country [44] 0 0
Peru
State/province [44] 0 0
Ica
Country [45] 0 0
Peru
State/province [45] 0 0
Piura
Country [46] 0 0
Philippines
State/province [46] 0 0
Cebu City
Country [47] 0 0
Philippines
State/province [47] 0 0
Iloilo City
Country [48] 0 0
Philippines
State/province [48] 0 0
Makati City
Country [49] 0 0
Philippines
State/province [49] 0 0
Marikina City
Country [50] 0 0
Philippines
State/province [50] 0 0
Pasay
Country [51] 0 0
Philippines
State/province [51] 0 0
Pasig City
Country [52] 0 0
Philippines
State/province [52] 0 0
Pasig
Country [53] 0 0
Spain
State/province [53] 0 0
Alicante
Country [54] 0 0
Spain
State/province [54] 0 0
La Coruña
Country [55] 0 0
Spain
State/province [55] 0 0
Majadahonda (Madrid)
Country [56] 0 0
Spain
State/province [56] 0 0
Modulo H
Country [57] 0 0
Spain
State/province [57] 0 0
Sabadell
Country [58] 0 0
Spain
State/province [58] 0 0
Torrevieja (Alicante)
Country [59] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [59] 0 0
Birmingham
Country [60] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [60] 0 0
Hertfordshire
Country [61] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [61] 0 0
Livingston
Country [62] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [62] 0 0
London
Country [63] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [63] 0 0
Swansea

Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Name
GlaxoSmithKline
Country

Ethics approval
Ethics application status

Summary
Brief summary
Trial website
Trial related presentations / publications
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 0 0
GSK Clinical Trials
Address 0 0
GlaxoSmithKline
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for scientific queries

Data sharing statement


What supporting documents are/will be available?

No Supporting Document Provided



Results publications and other study-related documents

No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.