Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
A database of clinical trials and their results from Australia, New Zealand, and other countries.
account_circle
Log in
to register or update your trial
search
Search for trials
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06938841
Registration number
NCT06938841
Ethics application status
Date submitted
14/04/2025
Date registered
22/04/2025
Date last updated
22/04/2025
Titles & IDs
Public title
Maintenance rTMS for Depression (Maitr-De)
Query!
Scientific title
Maintaining the Acute Therapeutic Effect of rTMS in Treatment-Resistant Depression (Maitr-De)
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
811708
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Maitr-De
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Major Depressive Disorder
0
0
Query!
Treatment Resistant Depression
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Mental Health
0
0
0
0
Query!
Depression
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Devices - Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) - Standard maintenance rTMS:
Treatment: Devices - Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) - Clustered maintenance rTMS:
Treatment: Devices - Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) -- Sham maintenance rTMS
Experimental: Clustered maintenance rTMS - Clustered maintenance treatment involves administering four sessions of rTMS over a two-day span, conducted once per month for six months.
Active comparator: Standard maintenance rTMS: - Standard maintenance rTMS involves a course of rTMS with once-weekly sessions for 6 months.
Placebo comparator: sham maintenance rTMS - Somatosensory-matched placebo rTMS is delivered according to either standard or clustered maintenance schedules over a six-month period (50/50% allotment). Patient's maintenance protocol parameters will otherwise mirror those used during their acute treatment with identical cortical targets, stimulation intensity, frequency, and duration. Sham TMS-EEG will be conducted by rotating the coil 90 degrees while maintaining contact with the scalp. This standard practice prevents current induction while replicating the auditory click associated with TMS, ensuring comparable EEG recordings
Treatment: Devices: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) - Standard maintenance rTMS:
In this approach, patients who were treated with rTMS five days per week during their acute episode receive less frequent treatments during a taper period (for example treatment three days per week followed by two sessions per week) with a gradual transition into a maintenance schedule. For example, the maintenance schedule might begin with a single weekly session for one or two months and then the intensity is reduced to one session every two weeks (and possibly then one session every three or four weeks).
Treatment: Devices: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) - Clustered maintenance rTMS:
Clustered maintenance rTMS typically involves around 4 TMS sessions applied over 2 days, at 1-month intervals. Our team initially developed this approach based upon preclinical TMS studies (for example (Maeda et al. 2000)) suggesting that rTMS treatment effects may accumulate when applied over multiple sessions in a shorter period of time (Maeda et al. 2000).
Treatment: Devices: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) -- Sham maintenance rTMS
Sham treatment will be administered as either standard or clustered maintenance rTMS for 6 months period using a sham coil. The intervention target will be located via a Brainsight TMS Navigator (Brainsight, Montreal, Canada). For safety reasons, the individual TMS intensity will be limited to 130% of the individual resting motor threshold.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Aim: To evaluate the effects of two active rTMS maintenance treatments (i.e., standard and clustered) compared to sham maintenance rTMS on DLPFC-SGC connectivity.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Our primary aim is to examine the efficacy of maintenance rTMS on sustaining connectivity between the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and subgenual cingulate cortex (SGC) measured through concurrent TMS and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) at baseline and every six weeks throughout the 6-month treatment period
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
6-months
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* 1. They met criteria for a DSM-5 diagnosis of a Major Depressive Episode (MDE) during the index episode of depression for which they have received an acute rTMS treatment course.
2. Meet criteria for either response or remission from their initial depressive illness. The MINI assessment timeline will be adjusted to allow scoring of illness symptoms prior to rTMS response. Response to acute course of treatment is defined as either a MADRS score of <7, or a MADRS score of 7-19, plus evidence of having met response criteria on either the MADRS or another structured depression rating scale. The response is defined as a >50% reduction in the total score from the start to the end of treatment.
3. Their initial rTMS treatment course must have consisted of at least 15 rTMS treatment sessions.
4. People between the ages of 18 and 80 at the time of screening. A written statement from the referring physician will be required to confirm that the participant demonstrates the capacity to consent.
5. Able to read, understand, and provide written, dated informed consent prior to screening. Proficiency in English sufficient to complete questionnaires / follow instructions during TMS-EEG assessments and iTBS interventions. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures, including availability for the duration of the study, and to communicate with study personnel about adverse events and other clinically important information.
6. In good general health, as evidenced by medical history. 7. Agreement to adhere to Lifestyle Considerations throughout study duration. 8. If a person of child-bearing potential is: must take a pregnancy test at the screening visit, with results confirmed as negative by study staff
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
80
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
* 1. Pregnancy 2. History of or current psychotic disorder or depression with psychotic features 3. Severe borderline personality disorder based on clinical assessment. 4. Diagnosis of Intellectual Disability or Autism Spectrum Disorder 5. Current moderate or severe substance use disorder or demonstrating signs of acute substance withdrawal 6. Clinically significant suicidal ideation with plan 7. Any history of ECT (greater than 8 sessions) without a clinical meaningful response in the current episode.
8. Recent (during the current depressive episode) or concurrent use of rapid-acting antidepressant agent (i.e., ketamine or a course of ECT) in the last 30 days 9. History of significant neurologic disease, including dementia, Parkinson's or Huntington's disease, brain tumor, seizure disorder, subdural hematoma, multiple sclerosis, or history of significant head trauma 10. Untreated or insufficiently treated endocrine disorder. 11. Contraindications to receiving rTMS (e.g., metal in head, history of seizure, known brain lesion) 12. Treatment with an investigational drug or other intervention within the study period 13. Unstable symptoms between screening and baseline as defined by a = 30% change in MADRS score.
14. Require a benzodiazepine with a dose > lorazepam 2 mg/day or equivalent or any anticonvulsant (with the exception of Gabapentin).
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
1/04/2025
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
31/03/2026
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
75
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
ACT
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Australian National University - Canberra
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
2601 - Canberra
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
California
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
New York
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Other
Query!
Name
University of California, San Diego
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has emerged as a promising intervention for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), yet substantial uncertainties persist regarding its efficacy as a maintenance treatment. This prospective study seeks to investigate the efficacy of maintenance rTMS in individuals with TRD who have previously responded to an acute course of rTMS. In the R61 phase of the study, we will recruit 75 participants across three study sites, the University of California San Diego, Weill Cornell Medicine, and Australian National University, into a double-blind, three-arm maintenance treatment trial. In this trial, participants will be randomized to receive either standard maintenance rTMS, clustered maintenance rTMS, or sham maintenance rTMS for a duration of 6 months. Our primary aim is to examine the efficacy of maintenance rTMS on sustaining connectivity between the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and subgenual cingulate cortex (SGC) measured through concurrent TMS and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) at baseline and every six weeks throughout the 6-month treatment period. We will also assess changes in depressive symptom severity using clinical scales, including the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) as a secondary outcome measure. It is hypothesized that stimulation with clustered maintenance rTMS will demonstrate superiority in sustaining DLPFC-SGC connectivity compared with standard maintenance rTMS and sham maintenance rTMS
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06938841
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Interventional Psychiatry
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
858-657-6152
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
No
Query!
No/undecided IPD sharing reason/comment
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results not provided in
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06938841
Download to PDF