ANZCTR - Registration

Please note the ANZCTR will be unattended from Friday 20 December 2024 for the holidays. The Registry will re-open on Tuesday 7 January 2025. Submissions and updates will not be processed during that time.

Registering a new trial?

To achieve prospective registration, we recommend submitting your trial for registration at the same time as ethics submission.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers

Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov

For full trial details, please see the original record at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01896947

Registration number

NCT01896947

Ethics application status

Date submitted

8/07/2013

Date registered

11/07/2013

Date last updated

1/10/2024

Titles & IDs

Public title

3T MRI Versus MR Arthrogram in SLAP Lesions

Scientific title

Three Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging Compared to Magnetic Resonance Arthrogram in Diagnosing Superior Labrum Anterior Posterior (SLAP) Lesions

Secondary ID [1]

SLAP MR study

Universal Trial Number (UTN)

Trial acronym

Linked study record

Health condition

Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:

Superior Labrum Anterior Posterior Lesion

Condition category

Condition code

Intervention/exposure

Study type

Observational

Patient registry

Target follow-up duration

Target follow-up type

Description of intervention(s) / exposure

Diagnosis / Prognosis - MRI

MRI and MRA group - All patients will receive 3T MRI and MR arthrogram

Diagnosis / Prognosis: MRI
evaluating to see if 3T MRI is as effective as MR arthrogram to diagnose labral pathology

Intervention code [1]

Diagnosis / Prognosis

Comparator / control treatment

Control group

Outcomes

Primary outcome [1]

Sensitivity 3T MRI

Timepoint [1]

3 months

Primary outcome [2]

Specificity 3T MRI

Timepoint [2]

3 months

Primary outcome [3]

Positive predictive value 3T MRI

Timepoint [3]

3 months

Primary outcome [4]

Negative predictive value 3T MRI

Timepoint [4]

3 months

Primary outcome [5]

Sensitivity MRA

Timepoint [5]

3 months

Primary outcome [6]

Specificity MRA

Timepoint [6]

3 months

Primary outcome [7]

Positive predictive value MRA

Timepoint [7]

3 months

Primary outcome [8]

Negative predictive value MRA

Timepoint [8]

3 months

Eligibility

Key inclusion criteria

* SLAP lesion

Minimum age

18 Years

Maximum age

No limit

Sex

Both males and females

Can healthy volunteers participate?

Key exclusion criteria

* Skeletally immature
* Previous SLAP lesion on ipsilateral side
* Implants contraindicated for MRI

Study design

Purpose

Duration

Selection

Timing

Prospective

Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment

Recruitment status

Withdrawn

Data analysis

Reason for early stopping/withdrawal

Other reasons

Date of first participant enrolment

Anticipated

Actual

29/09/2024

Date of last participant enrolment

Anticipated

Actual

Date of last data collection

Anticipated

Actual

29/09/2024

Sample size

Target

Accrual to date

Final

Recruitment in Australia

Recruitment state(s)

Recruitment outside Australia

Country [1]

United States of America

State/province [1]

Michigan

Funding & Sponsors

Primary sponsor type

Other

Name

Henry Ford Health System

Address

Country

Ethics approval

Ethics application status

Summary

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of three Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (3T MRI) compared to magnetic resonance arthrogram (MR arthrogram) in diagnosing superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) lesions. We hypothesize that 3T MRI will have non-inferior sensitivity compared to MR arthrogram in diagnosing SLAP lesions utilizing arthroscopy as our gold standard test. To evaluate our hypothesis, the investigators will include patients suspected to have a SLAP lesion on history and physical examination by a fellowship trained orthopaedic surgery. Patients will be offered advanced imaging (both 3T MRI and MR arthrogram) as well as arthroscopy for definitive diagnosis and treatment after consent is obtained. A fellowship trained musculoskeletal radiologist will perform and interpret the magnetic resonance tests while the arthroscopy will be performed by orthopaedic surgeons. The diagnostic characteristics of each imaging modality, including sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value, will be compared to each other.

Trial website

https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01896947

Trial related presentations / publications

Chang D, Mohana-Borges A, Borso M, Chung CB. SLAP lesions: anatomy, clinical presentation, MR imaging diagnosis and characterization. Eur J Radiol. 2008 Oct;68(1):72-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.02.026. Epub 2008 May 21.
Phillips JC, Cook C, Beaty S, Kissenberth MJ, Siffri P, Hawkins RJ. Validity of noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing superior labrum anterior-posterior tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Jan;22(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.03.013. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
Dinauer PA, Flemming DJ, Murphy KP, Doukas WC. Diagnosis of superior labral lesions: comparison of noncontrast MRI with indirect MR arthrography in unexercised shoulders. Skeletal Radiol. 2007 Mar;36(3):195-202. doi: 10.1007/s00256-006-0237-7. Epub 2006 Dec 1.
Connell DA, Potter HG, Wickiewicz TL, Altchek DW, Warren RF. Noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging of superior labral lesions. 102 cases confirmed at arthroscopic surgery. Am J Sports Med. 1999 Mar-Apr;27(2):208-13. doi: 10.1177/03635465990270021601.
Waldt S, Burkart A, Lange P, Imhoff AB, Rummeny EJ, Woertler K. Diagnostic performance of MR arthrography in the assessment of superior labral anteroposterior lesions of the shoulder. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 May;182(5):1271-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.182.5.1821271.
Applegate GR, Hewitt M, Snyder SJ, Watson E, Kwak S, Resnick D. Chronic labral tears: value of magnetic resonance arthrography in evaluating the glenoid labrum and labral-bicipital complex. Arthroscopy. 2004 Nov;20(9):959-63. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.08.017.
Bencardino JT, Beltran J, Rosenberg ZS, Rokito A, Schmahmann S, Mota J, Mellado JM, Zuckerman J, Cuomo F, Rose D. Superior labrum anterior-posterior lesions: diagnosis with MR arthrography of the shoulder. Radiology. 2000 Jan;214(1):267-71. doi: 10.1148/radiology.214.1.r00ja22267.
Jee WH, McCauley TR, Katz LD, Matheny JM, Ruwe PA, Daigneault JP. Superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) lesions of the glenoid labrum: reliability and accuracy of MR arthrography for diagnosis. Radiology. 2001 Jan;218(1):127-32. doi: 10.1148/radiology.218.1.r01ja44127.

Public notes

 This record is viewable in the ANZCTR as it had previously listed Australia and/or New Zealand as a recruitment site, however these sites have since been removed

Contacts

Principal investigator

Name

Stephanie Muh, MD

Address

Henry Ford Hospital

Country

Phone

Fax

Contact person for public queries

Name

Address

Country

Phone

Fax

Contact person for scientific queries

No information has been provided regarding IPD availability

What supporting documents are/will be available?

No Supporting Document Provided

Results publications and other study-related documents

No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.

Results not provided in https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01896947

Trial Review

Registering a new trial?

For full trial details, please see the original record at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01896947