The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov

For full trial details, please see the original record at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05059262




Registration number
NCT05059262
Ethics application status
Date submitted
17/09/2021
Date registered
28/09/2021
Date last updated
25/03/2025

Titles & IDs
Public title
Study of Vimseltinib for Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor
Scientific title
A Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Study of Vimseltinib to Assess the Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (MOTION)
Secondary ID [1] 0 0
2024-513624-42-00
Secondary ID [2] 0 0
DCC-3014-03-001
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
MOTION
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor 0 0
Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis 0 0
Giant Cell Tumor of Tendon Sheath 0 0
Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor, Diffuse 0 0
Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor, Localized 0 0
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer 0 0 0 0
Bone
Cancer 0 0 0 0
Other cancer types
Musculoskeletal 0 0 0 0
Other muscular and skeletal disorders

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Vimseltinib
Treatment: Drugs - Placebo

Experimental: Part 1/Part 2 - Vimseltinib/Vimseltinib - Participants received blinded treatment of 30 mg twice a week (BIW) vimseltinib for 24 weeks in Part 1 and open-label 30 mg BIW vimseltinib in Part 2.

Placebo comparator: Part 1/Part 2: Placebo/Vimseltinib - Participants received blinded treatment of BIW matching placebo for 24 weeks in Part 1 and open-label 30 mg BIW vimseltinib in Part 2.


Treatment: Drugs: Vimseltinib
Administered orally

Treatment: Drugs: Placebo
Administered orally

Intervention code [1] 0 0
Treatment: Drugs
Comparator / control treatment
Control group

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 0 0
Objective Response Rate (ORR) at Week 25 Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1
Assessment method [1] 0 0
ORR was assessed by blinded independent radiologic review (IRR) using RECIST Version 1.1. ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). * CR: Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must be \<10 millimeter (mm) in short axis. Non-nodal targets must be absent. * PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Timepoint [1] 0 0
Baseline to Week 25 (Cycle 7, Day 1)
Secondary outcome [1] 0 0
ORR at Week 25 Per Tumor Volume Score (TVS)
Assessment method [1] 0 0
TVS is a semi-quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scoring system that describes tumor mass and is based on 10% increments of the estimated volume of the maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath involved. A tumor that is equal in volume to that of a maximally distended synovial cavity or tendon sheath was scored 10; a score of 0 indicated no evidence of tumor. ORR was the percentage of participants who achieved either CR or PR as assessed by blinded IRR using TVS. * CR: Lesion completely gone * PR: =50% decrease in volume score relative to Baseline.
Timepoint [1] 0 0
Baseline to Week 25 (Cycle 7, Day 1)
Secondary outcome [2] 0 0
Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (ROM) at Week 25
Assessment method [2] 0 0
Presented here is the change from baseline in active ROM to Week 25. Measurement of the affected and contralateral, non-affected joint was assessed by goniometer and measured in degrees. At baseline, the motion with the smallest relative ROM value (worst) was identified, and this motion was used for evaluating the change in relative ROM subsequently. The affected joint measurement was used to derive a relative ROM based on active measurement relative to reference standard value provided by the American Medical Association. Relative ROM is expressed in percent: 100 x (joint ROM measure)/(reference ROM standard).
Timepoint [2] 0 0
Baseline to Week 25 (Cycle 7, Day 1)
Secondary outcome [3] 0 0
Change From Baseline in the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) Score at Week 25
Assessment method [3] 0 0
All participants were asked 15 questions from the PROMIS-PF item bank. The questions used one of two 5-point verbal rating scales: either 1 = "unable to do", 2 = "with much difficulty", 3 = "with some difficulty", 4 = "with a little difficulty", and 5 = "without any difficulty"; or 1 = "cannot do", 2 = "quite a lot", 3 = "somewhat", 4 = "very little", and 5 = "not at all." Total scores were converted to T-scores that ranged from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing less physical function interference and better health outcomes.
Timepoint [3] 0 0
Baseline to Week 25 (Cycle 7, Day 1)
Secondary outcome [4] 0 0
Change From Baseline in the Worst Stiffness Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score at Week 25
Assessment method [4] 0 0
The Worst Stiffness NRS is a single question that asks the participant to assess their worst stiffness in the last 24 hours. Participants rate their worst stiffness on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 is "no stiffness" and 10 is "worst imaginable." Lower scores represented better level of stiffness.
Timepoint [4] 0 0
Baseline to Week 25 (Cycle 7, Day 1)
Secondary outcome [5] 0 0
Change From Baseline in EuroQoL Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) at Week 25
Assessment method [5] 0 0
The EQ-VAS is a standardized tool for measuring overall health. EQ-VAS recorded the participant's self-rated health on a vertical VAS scale ranging from a minimum of 0 (worst imaginable health state) to a maximum of 100 (best imaginable health state). Higher scores indicated better health state.
Timepoint [5] 0 0
Baseline to Week 25 (Cycle 7, Day 1)
Secondary outcome [6] 0 0
Percentage of Participants With Response at Week 25 Based on Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Worst Pain NRS Score and Narcotic Analgesic Use
Assessment method [6] 0 0
Participants reported responses to the BPI Worst Pain NRS. The BPI Worst Pain NRS ranged from 0 to 10, where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "pain as bad as you can imagine." A responder was defined as a participant who: (i) experienced a decrease of at least 30% in the mean BPI Worst Pain NRS item and (ii) did not experience a 30% or greater increase in narcotic analgesic use.
Timepoint [6] 0 0
Baseline to Week 25 (Cycle 7, Day 1)

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Patients =18 years of age
2. TGCT for which surgical resection is not an option (tumor biopsy to confirm diagnosis required if no histology/pathology available at screening)
3. Symptomatic disease as defined as at least moderate pain or at least moderate stiffness (defined as a score of 4 or more, with 10 describing the worst condition) within the screening period and documented in the medical record
4. Participants should complete 14 consecutive days of questionnaires during the screening period and must meet minimum requirements as outlined in study protocol
5. Must have stable analgesic regimen, as judged by the investigator, for at least 2 weeks prior to first dose of study drug
6. Must have measurable disease, as per RECIST Version 1.1, with at least one lesion having a minimum size of 2cm
7. Adequate organ and bone marrow function
8. If a female of childbearing potential, must have a negative pregnancy test prior to enrollment and agree to follow the contraception requirements
9. Must provide signed consent to participate in the study and is willing to comply with study-specific procedures
10. Willing and able to complete the patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessments on an electronic device
Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
No limit
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
1. Previous use of systemic therapy (investigational or approved) targeting colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF1) or colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R); previous therapy with imatinib and nilotinib is allowed
2. Received therapy for TGCT, including investigational therapy during the screening period. Participated in a non-TGCT investigational drug study within 30 days of screening.
3. Known metastatic TGCT or other active cancer that requires concurrent treatment (exceptions will be considered on a case-by-case basis)
4. QT interval corrected by Fridericia's formula (QTcF) >450 ms in males or >470 ms in females or history of long QT syndrome
5. Concurrent treatment with any study-prohibited medications
6. Major surgery within 14 days of the first dose of study drug
7. Any clinically significant comorbidities
8. Active liver or biliary disease including nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) or cirrhosis
9. Malabsorption syndrome or other illness that could affect oral absorption
10. Known active human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), acute or chronic hepatitis B, acute or chronic hepatitis C, or known active mycobacterium tuberculosis infection
11. If female, the participant is pregnant or breastfeeding
12. Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any component of the study drug
13. Contraindication to MRI

Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Intervention assignment
Crossover
Other design features
Phase
Phase 3
Type of endpoint/s
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Active, not recruiting
Data analysis
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Recruitment hospital [1] 0 0
Chris O'Brien Lifehouse - Camperdown
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 0 0
- Camperdown
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [1] 0 0
California
Country [2] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [2] 0 0
Colorado
Country [3] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [3] 0 0
Kansas
Country [4] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [4] 0 0
Massachusetts
Country [5] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [5] 0 0
Minnesota
Country [6] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [6] 0 0
New York
Country [7] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [7] 0 0
North Carolina
Country [8] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [8] 0 0
Ohio
Country [9] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [9] 0 0
Texas
Country [10] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [10] 0 0
Washington
Country [11] 0 0
Canada
State/province [11] 0 0
Montréal
Country [12] 0 0
Canada
State/province [12] 0 0
Toronto
Country [13] 0 0
France
State/province [13] 0 0
Bordeaux
Country [14] 0 0
France
State/province [14] 0 0
Lyon
Country [15] 0 0
France
State/province [15] 0 0
Villejuif
Country [16] 0 0
Germany
State/province [16] 0 0
Berlin
Country [17] 0 0
Germany
State/province [17] 0 0
Essen
Country [18] 0 0
Hong Kong
State/province [18] 0 0
Hong Kong
Country [19] 0 0
Italy
State/province [19] 0 0
Bologna
Country [20] 0 0
Italy
State/province [20] 0 0
Milan
Country [21] 0 0
Italy
State/province [21] 0 0
Naples
Country [22] 0 0
Italy
State/province [22] 0 0
Padua
Country [23] 0 0
Italy
State/province [23] 0 0
Rome
Country [24] 0 0
Netherlands
State/province [24] 0 0
Leiden
Country [25] 0 0
Norway
State/province [25] 0 0
Oslo
Country [26] 0 0
Poland
State/province [26] 0 0
Warsaw
Country [27] 0 0
Spain
State/province [27] 0 0
Barcelona
Country [28] 0 0
Spain
State/province [28] 0 0
Madrid
Country [29] 0 0
Switzerland
State/province [29] 0 0
Basel
Country [30] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [30] 0 0
London

Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Name
Deciphera Pharmaceuticals, LLC
Country

Ethics approval
Ethics application status

Summary
Brief summary
Trial website
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for scientific queries

No information has been provided regarding IPD availability


What supporting documents are/will be available?

Results publications and other study-related documents

No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.