Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
A database of clinical trials and their results from Australia, New Zealand, and other countries.
account_circle
Log in
to register or update your trial
search
Search for trials
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov
For full trial details, please see the original record at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04739761
Registration number
NCT04739761
Ethics application status
Date submitted
20/01/2021
Date registered
5/02/2021
Date last updated
16/05/2025
Titles & IDs
Public title
A Study of T-DXd in Participants With or Without Brain Metastasis Who Have Previously Treated Advanced or Metastatic HER2 Positive Breast Cancer
Query!
Scientific title
An Open-Label, Multinational, Multicenter, Phase 3b/4 Study of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Patients With or Without Baseline Brain Metastasis With Previously Treated Advanced/Metastatic HER2-Positive Breast Cancer (DESTINY-Breast12)
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
0
0
2024-510588-53-00
Query!
Secondary ID [2]
0
0
D9673C00007
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
DESTINY-B12
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Breast Cancer
0
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Breast
Query!
Cancer
0
0
0
0
Query!
Brain
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - Trastuzumab Deruxtecan
Experimental: Trastuzumab Deruxtecan - Participants with or without BM at baseline will receive intravenous (IV) T-DXd, 5.4 mg/kg, every 3 weeks (21-day cycle) until Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) defined radiological progression outside central nervous system, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or another criterion for discontinuation is met.
Treatment: Drugs: Trastuzumab Deruxtecan
Participants will receive T-DXd administered using an IV bag containing 5% (w/v) dextrose injection infusion solution.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
0
0
Treatment: Drugs
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Query!
Control group
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
0
0
Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Cohort 1 (Participants Without Brain Metastasis at Baseline)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
The ORR is defined as the percentage (%) of participants who have a confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR), as determined by independent central review (ICR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
From first dose (Day 1) to progression of disease (up to 2 years 7 months)
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
0
0
Progression-free Survival (PFS) Rate at 12 Months in Cohort 2 (Participants With Brain Metastasis at Baseline)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The PFS rate is the percentage of participants alive and free of disease progression at 12 months, estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
At 12 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
0
0
Survival Rate at 12 Months
Query!
Assessment method [1]
0
0
Survival rate is the percentage of participants alive at 12 months, estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
0
0
At 12 Months
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
0
0
Objective Response Rate in Cohort 2 (Participants With Brain Metastasis at Baseline)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
0
0
The ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who have a confirmed CR or confirmed PR, as determined by ICR per RECIST 1.1.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
0
0
From first dose (Day 1) to progression of disease (up to 2 years 7 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
0
0
Duration of Response (DoR)
Query!
Assessment method [3]
0
0
Duration of response is defined as the time from the date of first documented confirmed response until date of documented progression per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by ICR or death due to any cause.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
0
0
From the date of first documented confirmed response until date of documented progression (up to 2 years 7 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
0
0
Time to Progression
Query!
Assessment method [4]
0
0
Time to progression by RECIST 1.1 per ICR is defined as the time from the date of the first dose of study intervention to the date of documented disease progression.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
0
0
From first dose (Day 1) to progression of disease (up to 2 years 7 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
0
0
Duration of Treatment on Subsequent Lines of Therapy
Query!
Assessment method [5]
0
0
Duration of treatment on subsequent therapy is defined as the time from the date of first dose of a subsequent therapy until date of the last dose of that therapy.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
0
0
From the date of first dose of a subsequent therapy until date of last dose of therapy (up to 2 years 7 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
0
0
Second Progression-Free Survival Rate at 12 Months
Query!
Assessment method [6]
0
0
Second progression-free survival rate is the percentage of participants alive and free from a second progression on next-line treatment at 12 months, estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The second progression is defined as the earliest progression event subsequent to the first anti-cancer therapy after the initial progression.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
0
0
At 12 Months
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
0
0
Incidence of New Symptomatic Central Nervous System (CNS) Metastasis During Treatment Without CNS Metastasis at Baseline (Cohort 1)
Query!
Assessment method [7]
0
0
The incidence rate is defined as proportion of participants with new symptomatic CNS metastases during treatment period in participants without symptomatic CNS metastasis at baseline.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
0
0
From first dose (Day 1) to end of treatment (up to 2 years 7 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
0
0
Time to Next Progression (CNS or Extracranial) or Death
Query!
Assessment method [8]
0
0
The time to next progression is defined as the time from the date of the first documented isolated CNS progression to the date of the next documented disease progression (CNS or extracranial) per RECIST 1.1 or death and has been summarized descriptively in participants who have developed isolated CNS progression, receive local therapy, and continue on protocol therapy.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
0
0
From date of first documented isolated CNS progression to the date of the next documented disease progression (up to 2 years 7 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
0
0
Site (CNS vs Extracranial vs Both) of Next Progression
Query!
Assessment method [9]
0
0
Site of next progression (CNS \[CNS RECIST 1.1\] or extracranial \[systemic RECIST 1.1\] in participants who developed isolated CNS progression, received local therapy, and continued on protocol therapy.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
0
0
From the date of the first documented isolated CNS progression to the date of the next documented CNS disease progression (up to 2 years 7 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
0
0
Central Nervous System Progression-free Survival Rate at 12 Months in Participants With Brain Metastasis at Baseline (Cohort 2)
Query!
Assessment method [10]
0
0
Central nervous system progression free survival rate is the percentage of participants free from central nervous system progression at 12 months, estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
0
0
At 12 Months
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
0
0
Time to New CNS Lesions in Participants With Brain Metastasis at Baseline (Cohort 2)
Query!
Assessment method [11]
0
0
The time to new CNS lesions is defined as the time from the date of the first dose of study intervention to the date of documented new CNS lesions by RECIST 1.1 per ICR.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
0
0
From first dose (Day 1) to the date of documented new CNS lesions (up to 2 years 7 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
0
0
Central Nervous System Objective Response Rate in Participants With Brain Metastasis at Baseline by ICR (Cohort 2)
Query!
Assessment method [12]
0
0
The CNS ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with measurable brain metastasis at baseline who have a confirmed CR or confirmed PR of brain lesions, as determined by ICR per CNS RECIST 1.1.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
0
0
From first dose (Day 1) until CNS progression of disease (up to 2 years 7 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
0
0
Central Nervous System Duration of Response in Participants With Brain Metastasis at Baseline (Cohort 2)
Query!
Assessment method [13]
0
0
The CNS DoR is defined as the time from the date of first documented confirmed CNS response until date of documented CNS progression per CNS RECIST 1.1 as assessed by ICR or death due to any cause.
Query!
Timepoint [13]
0
0
From date of first documented confirmed CNS response until CNS progression of disease (up to 2 years 7 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
0
0
Number of Participants With Best on Treatment Visit Response on the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer 30-Item Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Query!
Assessment method [14]
0
0
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire for cancer assessment. Increased scores indicate improvement; decreased scores indicate deterioration. Physical function: =+9= improvement, =-10=deterioration, otherwise=no change; Role functioning: =-6=deterioration, otherwise=no change; Social functioning: =+8=improvement, =-7=deterioration, otherwise=no change; Cognitive functioning: =+ 5=improvement, =- 4=deterioration, otherwise=no change; Global Health Status: =+2=improvement, =-8=deterioration, otherwise=no change; Fatigue: =+8=improvement, =-8=deterioration, otherwise=no change; Nausea and vomiting: =-11=deterioration, otherwise=no change; Appetite loss: =-14=deterioration, otherwise=no change; rest of scales: =+10=improvement, =-10=deterioration, otherwise=no change. Best on treatment response is best response category (improvement, no change, and deterioration) achieved by participants between first dose and 47 days after last dose, and prior to starting any anticancer therapy.
Query!
Timepoint [14]
0
0
Time from first dose up to 47 days after last dose, or prior to starting any subsequent therapy, or for up to 2 years 7 months, whichever occurred first
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
0
0
Number of Participants With Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Scale (NANO Scale)
Query!
Assessment method [15]
0
0
The NANO scale is a clinician-reported assessment of neurologic functioning in neuro-oncology participants. The instrument captures 9 domains (gait, strength, ataxia, sensation, visual fields, facial strength, language, level of consciousness, and behavior) and was developed to provide a simple, objective assessment of neurologic function that would be combined with radiographic assessment to provide an overall outcome assessment for neuro-oncology participants in clinical trials and in daily practice. The soring scale for Gait consists of score range 0-3, Strength consists of score range 0-2, ataxia (upper extremity) consists of scale range 0-2 and sensation as 0. Higher scores indicate worse neurologic function. The response categories reported are changes from first post-baseline score to worst on-treatment score at any point of treatment.
Query!
Timepoint [15]
0
0
Time from first dose up to 47 days after last dose, or prior to starting any subsequent therapy, or for up to 2 years 7 months, whichever occurred first
Query!
Secondary outcome [16]
0
0
Cognitive Functions Tests: Paired Associates Learning (PAL) First Attempt Memory Score (PALFAMS)
Query!
Assessment method [16]
0
0
The PAL is a computerized, self-completed cognitive test used to capture cognitive function, including attention, memory, and executive function. This gamified test included PAL and was a low-burden, highly sensitive, precise measure of cognitive function. The PALFAMS is the number of times a participant chose the correct box on their first attempt when recalling the pattern locations, calculated across all assessed trials. A higher number of events of selecting correct boxes indicates better cognitive function. Here, baseline was the last non-missing value prior to administration of the first dose of study intervention.
Query!
Timepoint [16]
0
0
Baseline, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 9 Day 1, Cycle 13 Day 1, and Cycle 17 Day 1 (21 days cycle)
Query!
Secondary outcome [17]
0
0
Cognitive Functions Tests: Paired Associates Learning Total Errors Adjusted (PALTEA)
Query!
Assessment method [17]
0
0
The PAL is a computerized, self-completed cognitive test used to capture cognitive function, including attention, memory, and executive function. This gamified test included PALTEA and was a low-burden, highly sensitive, precise measure of cognitive function. PALTEA is the number of times a participant chose the incorrect box for a stimulus on assessment problems, plus an adjustment for the estimated number of errors they would have made on any problems, attempts, and recalls they did not reach. A higher number of events of selecting incorrect boxes indicates worse cognitive function. Here, baseline was the last non-missing value prior to administration of the first dose of study intervention.
Query!
Timepoint [17]
0
0
Baseline, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 9 Day 1, Cycle 13 Day 1, and Cycle 17 Day 1 (21 days cycle)
Query!
Secondary outcome [18]
0
0
Cognitive Functions Tests: Reaction Time (RTI)
Query!
Assessment method [18]
0
0
This is a computerized, self-completed cognitive test used to capture cognitive function, including attention, memory, and executive function. This gamified test included Reaction Time Task (RTI) and was low-burden, highly sensitive, precise measures of cognitive function. RTI Median Five-Choice Movement Time: median time taken for a participant to release response button and select target stimulus after it flashed yellow on screen. Calculated across correct, assessed trials in which stimulus could appear in any one of five locations. RTI Median Five-Choice Reaction Time: median duration it took for a participant to release response button after presentation of target stimulus. Calculated across correct, assessed trials in which stimulus could appear in any one of five locations. Measured in milliseconds. Higher reaction times indicate worse cognitive function. Here, baseline was the last non-missing value prior to administration of the first dose of study intervention.
Query!
Timepoint [18]
0
0
Baseline, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 9 Day 1, Cycle 13 Day 1, and Cycle 17 Day 1 (21 days cycle)
Query!
Secondary outcome [19]
0
0
Cognitive Functions Tests: Spatial Working Memory (SWM)
Query!
Assessment method [19]
0
0
The SWM is a computerized cognitive test. The SWM Between Errors (SWMBE) is number of times a participant incorrectly revisits a box in which a token has previously been found, calculated across all 4, 6, and 8 token trials. SWM Between Errors 4 Boxes (SWMBE4), SWM Between Errors 6 Boxes (SWMBE6), and SWM Between Errors 8 Boxes (SWMBE8) are number of times a participant revisits a box in which a token has previously been found. These are calculated across all trials with 4 tokens only for SWMBE4, 6 tokens only for SWMBE6, and 8 tokens only for SWMBE8. SWM Total Errors is number of times a box is selected that is certain not to contain a token and therefore should not have been visited by participant. A higher number of incorrect revisit events to previously found token boxes indicates worse cognitive function, and a lower number of revisit events indicates better cognitive function. Here, baseline was last non-missing value prior to administration of first dose of study intervention.
Query!
Timepoint [19]
0
0
Baseline, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 9 Day 1, Cycle 13 Day 1, and Cycle 17 Day 1 (21 days cycle)
Query!
Secondary outcome [20]
0
0
Cognitive Functions Tests: Spatial Working Memory Strategy (SWMS)
Query!
Assessment method [20]
0
0
The SWM is a computerized cognitive test. The SWMS, the number of times a participant restarted search patterns from the same initial box, indicating their use of a planned strategy to find tokens. An increased number of events where search patterns started from the same initial box suggested participants were using a planned strategy to find tokens, which indicated better cognitive function. Here, a low score indicated high strategy use (1 = they always began the search from the same box). Conversely, high scores represented a decrease in events of beginning searches from the same box. Instead, starting from many different boxes suggested the participant was not using a consistent strategy, which indicated worse cognitive function. This was calculated across assessed trials with 6 tokens or more. Here, baseline was the last non-missing value prior to administration of the first dose of study intervention.
Query!
Timepoint [20]
0
0
Baseline, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 9 Day 1, Cycle 13 Day 1, and Cycle 17 Day 1 (21 days cycle)
Query!
Secondary outcome [21]
0
0
St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire - Idiopathic (SGRQ-I) Pulmonary Fibrosis Version in Participants With Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD)/Pneumonitis
Query!
Assessment method [21]
0
0
The effect of T-DXd on symptoms, functioning, and HRQoL in HER2+ MBC participants with or without baseline brain metastasis was evaluated. The SGRQ-I is an idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis-specific version of the instrument developed and validated for use among participants with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, a type of ILD. The SGRQ-I was used to assess the HRQoL among participants who have been diagnosed with ILD/pneumonitis. It includes 34 of the original SGRQ items determined to be most reliable for assessing the HRQoL of participants with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. The instrument yields 3 domain scores (symptoms, activity, and impact) as well as a total score, with scores ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater impairment in HRQoL.
Query!
Timepoint [21]
0
0
From time of ILD/pneumonitis diagnosis (every week) until end of safety follow-up (47 days post last dose) (up to 2 years 7 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [22]
0
0
MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor-Specific Items in Brain Metastasis at Baseline Participants
Query!
Assessment method [22]
0
0
The T-DXd on symptoms, functioning, and HRQoL in HER2+ MBC participants with or without baseline brain metastasis was evaluated. The MDASI brain tumor module includes 9 symptoms specific to brain tumors (weakness on one side of the body, difficulty understanding, difficulty speaking, seizures, difficulty concentrating, problems with vision, change in appearance, change in bowel pattern (diarrhea or constipation), and irritability). These 9 items will be used to capture symptoms associated with brain metastasis for those diagnosed with brain metastasis. Each item is rated on an 11-point numeric rating scale on a scale of 0-10, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. Here, baseline was the last non-missing value prior to administration of the first dose of study intervention.
Query!
Timepoint [22]
0
0
Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, and Cycle 39 Day 1 (21 days cycle)
Query!
Secondary outcome [23]
0
0
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Query!
Assessment method [23]
0
0
The safety and tolerability of the participants who received T-DXd was evaluated. SAE=Serious adverse events; CTCAE=Common Terminology for Adverse Events
Query!
Timepoint [23]
0
0
From first dose until end of safety follow-up (47 days post last dose) (up to 2 years 7 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [24]
0
0
Number of Participants With Investigator-assessed ILD/Pneumonitis
Query!
Assessment method [24]
0
0
The number of participants with ILD/Pneumonitis were by grouped term based on Investigator-reported preferred terms. No adjudication was performed.
Query!
Timepoint [24]
0
0
From first dose until end of safety follow-up (47 days post last dose) (up to 2 years 7 months)
Query!
Secondary outcome [25]
0
0
Number of Participants With ILD Clinical Symptoms Resolution Among ILD/Pneumonitis Participants Who Have Been Treated With High Dose Steroid
Query!
Assessment method [25]
0
0
The number of participants with ILD clinical symptoms resolution in ILD/Pneumonitis participants who have been treated with high dose steroid (\>2 mg dexamethasone) were evaluated.
Query!
Timepoint [25]
0
0
From first dose until end of safety follow-up (47 days post last dose) (up to 2 years 7 months)
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Inclusion:
* Participants should have pathologically documented breast cancer that is: unresectable/advanced or metastatic; confirmed HER2-positive status expression as determined according to American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines
* Participant must have either: no evidence of BM, or untreated BM on screening contrast brain magnetic resonance imaging/ computed tomography (MRI/CT) scan, not needing immediate local therapy or previously-treated stable or progressing BM
* Participants with BMs must be neurologically stable
* For participants requiring radiotherapy due to BMs, there should be an adequate washout period before day of first dosing:
* = 7 days since stereotactic radiosurgery or gamma knife
* = 21 days since whole brain radiotherapy
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1
* Previous breast cancer treatment: radiologic or objective evidence of disease progression on or after HER2 targeted therapies and no more than 2 lines/regimens of therapy in the metastatic setting
* Participant with the following measurable: at least 1 lesion that can be accurately measured at baseline as = 10 mm in the longest diameter with CT or MRI and is suitable for accurate repeated measurements; or following Non-measurable diseases: Non-measurable, bone-only disease that can be assessed by CT or MRI or X-Ray. Lytic or mixed lytic bone lesions that can be assessed by CT or MRI or X-ray in the absence of measurable disease as defined above is acceptable; Participants with sclerotic/osteoblastic bone lesions only in the absence of measurable disease are not eligible; and Non-measurable CNS disease (Cohort 2 only)
* Adequate organ and bone marrow function within 14 days before the day of first dosing as defined in the protocol
* Left ventricular ejection fraction = 50% within 28 days before enrollment
* Negative pregnancy test (serum) for women of childbearing potential
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
130
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Known or suspected leptomeningeal disease
* Prior exposure to tucatinib treatment
* Refractory nausea and vomiting, chronic gastrointestinal disease, or previous significant bowel resection that would preclude adequate absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of T-DXd
* History of another primary malignancy except for malignancy treated with curative intent with no known active disease within 3 years before the first dose of study intervention and of low potential risk for recurrence
* Based on screening contrast brain MRI/CT scan, participants must not have any of the following: any untreated brain lesions > 2.0 cm in size; ongoing use of systemic corticosteroids for control of symptoms of BMs; any brain lesion thought to require immediate local therapy; have poorly controlled (> 1/week) generalized or complex partial seizures, or manifest neurologic progression due to BMs not withstanding CNS-directed therapy
* Has spinal cord compression
* Known active hepatitis B or C infection, such as those with serologic evidence of viral infection within 28 days of Cycle 1 Day 1. Participants with past or resolved hepatitis B virus infection are eligible, if negative for hepatitis B surface antigen and positive for anti-hepatitis B core antigen
* Participants positive for hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody are eligible only if polymerase chain reaction is negative for HCV RNA
* Uncontrolled infection requiring IV antibiotics, antivirals, or antifungals
* Receipt of live, attenuated vaccine within 30 days prior to the first dose of T-DXd
* Participants with a medical history of myocardial infarction within 6 months before screening, symptomatic congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association Class II to IV)
* History of (non-infectious) ILD/pneumonitis that required steroids, has current ILD/pneumonitis, or where suspected ILD/pneumonitis cannot be ruled out by imaging at screening
* Lung-specific intercurrent clinically significant illnesses and any autoimmune, connective tissue or inflammatory disorders
* Prior exposure, without adequate treatment washout period before the day of first dosing, to chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine: < 14 days
* Anticancer chemotherapy: immunotherapy (non-antibody-based therapy), retinoid therapy, hormonal therapy: < 3 weeks
* < 6 weeks for nitrosoureas or mitomycin
* Antibody-based anticancer therapy: < 4 weeks
* Any concurrent anticancer treatment. Concurrent use of hormonal therapy for noncancer- related conditions is allowed
* Unresolved toxicities from previous anticancer therapy, defined as toxicities (other than alopecia) not yet resolved to Grade = 1 or baseline
* Palliative radiotherapy with a limited field of radiation within 2 weeks or with wide field of radiation, radiation to the chest, or to more than 30% of the bone marrow within 4 weeks before the first dose of study intervention
* Participants with prior exposure to immunosuppressive medication within 14 days prior to first study dose
* Participants with a known hypersensitivity to study intervention or any of the excipients of the product or other monoclonal antibodies
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Not applicable
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Single group
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Phase 3
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Active, not recruiting
Query!
Data analysis
Query!
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Query!
Other reasons
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
22/06/2021
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
3/02/2026
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
506
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
0
0
Research Site - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
0
0
Research Site - Auchenflower
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
0
0
Research Site - Clayton
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
0
0
Research Site - Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
0
0
Research Site - St Leonards
Query!
Recruitment hospital [6]
0
0
Research Site - Subiaco
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
0
0
5000 - Adelaide
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
0
0
4066 - Auchenflower
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
0
0
3168 - Clayton
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
0
0
3084 - Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
0
0
2065 - St Leonards
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [6]
0
0
6008 - Subiaco
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [1]
0
0
Massachusetts
Query!
Country [2]
0
0
United States of America
Query!
State/province [2]
0
0
North Carolina
Query!
Country [3]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [3]
0
0
Anderlecht
Query!
Country [4]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [4]
0
0
Bruges
Query!
Country [5]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [5]
0
0
Leuven
Query!
Country [6]
0
0
Belgium
Query!
State/province [6]
0
0
Liège
Query!
Country [7]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [7]
0
0
British Columbia
Query!
Country [8]
0
0
Canada
Query!
State/province [8]
0
0
Ontario
Query!
Country [9]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [9]
0
0
Copenhagen
Query!
Country [10]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [10]
0
0
Herlev
Query!
Country [11]
0
0
Denmark
Query!
State/province [11]
0
0
Odense C
Query!
Country [12]
0
0
Finland
Query!
State/province [12]
0
0
Helsinki
Query!
Country [13]
0
0
Finland
Query!
State/province [13]
0
0
Tampere
Query!
Country [14]
0
0
Finland
Query!
State/province [14]
0
0
Turku
Query!
Country [15]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [15]
0
0
Berlin
Query!
Country [16]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [16]
0
0
Dresden
Query!
Country [17]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [17]
0
0
Erlangen
Query!
Country [18]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [18]
0
0
Essen
Query!
Country [19]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [19]
0
0
Frankfurt
Query!
Country [20]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [20]
0
0
Hamburg
Query!
Country [21]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [21]
0
0
Hannover
Query!
Country [22]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [22]
0
0
Kiel
Query!
Country [23]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [23]
0
0
Mannheim
Query!
Country [24]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [24]
0
0
München
Query!
Country [25]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [25]
0
0
Münster
Query!
Country [26]
0
0
Germany
Query!
State/province [26]
0
0
Tübingen
Query!
Country [27]
0
0
Ireland
Query!
State/province [27]
0
0
Cork
Query!
Country [28]
0
0
Ireland
Query!
State/province [28]
0
0
Dublin
Query!
Country [29]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [29]
0
0
Ancona
Query!
Country [30]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [30]
0
0
Bergamo
Query!
Country [31]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [31]
0
0
Catania
Query!
Country [32]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [32]
0
0
Milano
Query!
Country [33]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [33]
0
0
Napoli
Query!
Country [34]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [34]
0
0
Padova
Query!
Country [35]
0
0
Italy
Query!
State/province [35]
0
0
Prato
Query!
Country [36]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [36]
0
0
Isehara
Query!
Country [37]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [37]
0
0
Kawasaki-shi
Query!
Country [38]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [38]
0
0
Sapporo-shi
Query!
Country [39]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [39]
0
0
Shinagawa-ku
Query!
Country [40]
0
0
Japan
Query!
State/province [40]
0
0
Yokohama-shi
Query!
Country [41]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [41]
0
0
Den Haag
Query!
Country [42]
0
0
Netherlands
Query!
State/province [42]
0
0
Maastricht
Query!
Country [43]
0
0
Norway
Query!
State/province [43]
0
0
Bergen
Query!
Country [44]
0
0
Norway
Query!
State/province [44]
0
0
Oslo
Query!
Country [45]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [45]
0
0
Gdansk
Query!
Country [46]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [46]
0
0
Kraków
Query!
Country [47]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [47]
0
0
Opole
Query!
Country [48]
0
0
Poland
Query!
State/province [48]
0
0
Warszawa
Query!
Country [49]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [49]
0
0
Lisboa
Query!
Country [50]
0
0
Portugal
Query!
State/province [50]
0
0
Porto
Query!
Country [51]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [51]
0
0
Barcelona
Query!
Country [52]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [52]
0
0
Bilbao (Vizcaya)
Query!
Country [53]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [53]
0
0
Granada
Query!
Country [54]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [54]
0
0
Madrid
Query!
Country [55]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [55]
0
0
Salamanca
Query!
Country [56]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [56]
0
0
Santander
Query!
Country [57]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [57]
0
0
Santiago De Compostela-Coruña
Query!
Country [58]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [58]
0
0
Sevilla
Query!
Country [59]
0
0
Spain
Query!
State/province [59]
0
0
Valencia
Query!
Country [60]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [60]
0
0
Göteborg
Query!
Country [61]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [61]
0
0
Lund
Query!
Country [62]
0
0
Sweden
Query!
State/province [62]
0
0
Uppsala
Query!
Country [63]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [63]
0
0
Basel
Query!
Country [64]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [64]
0
0
Bellinzona
Query!
Country [65]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [65]
0
0
Lausanne
Query!
Country [66]
0
0
Switzerland
Query!
State/province [66]
0
0
Luzern
Query!
Country [67]
0
0
United Kingdom
Query!
State/province [67]
0
0
Edinburgh
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name
AstraZeneca
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
0
0
Commercial sector/industry
Query!
Name [1]
0
0
Daiichi Sankyo
Query!
Address [1]
0
0
Query!
Country [1]
0
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This is open-label, multicenter, international study, assessing the efficacy and safety of Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in participants with or without brain metastasis (BMs), with previously-treated advanced/metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer whose disease has progressed on prior anti-HER2-based regimens and who received no more than 2 lines/regimens of therapy in the metastatic setting (excluding tucatinib).
Query!
Trial website
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04739761
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
0
0
Nadia Harbeck, MD, PhD
Query!
Address
0
0
Head, Breast Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
0
0
Query!
Address
0
0
Query!
Country
0
0
Query!
Phone
0
0
Query!
Fax
0
0
Query!
Email
0
0
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Data sharing statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) for this trial be available (including data dictionaries)?
Yes
Query!
What data in particular will be shared?
Qualified researchers can request access to anonymized individual patient-level data from AstraZeneca group of companies sponsored clinical trials via the request portal. All requests will be evaluated as per the AZ disclosure commitment:
https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.
Yes, indicates that AZ are accepting requests for IPD, but this does not mean all requests will be shared.
Supporting document/s available: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan (SAP)
Query!
When will data be available (start and end dates)?
AstraZeneca will meet or exceed data availability as per the commitments made to the EFPIA Pharma Data Sharing Principles. For details of our timelines, please refer to our disclosure commitment at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.
Query!
Available to whom?
When a request has been approved AstraZeneca will provide access to the de-identified individual patient-level data in an approved sponsored tool. Signed Data Sharing Agreement (non-negotiable contract for data accessors) must be in place before accessing requested information. Additionally, all users will need to accept the terms and conditions of the SAS MSE to gain access. For additional details, please review the Disclosure Statements at https://astrazenecagrouptrials.pharmacm.com/ST/Submission/Disclosure.
Query!
Available for what types of analyses?
Query!
How or where can data be obtained?
IPD available at link: https://astrazenecagroup-dt.pharmacm.com/DT/Home
Query!
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Other Details
Attachment
Study protocol
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/61/NCT04739761/Prot_000.pdf
Statistical analysis plan
https://cdn.clinicaltrials.gov/large-docs/61/NCT04739761/SAP_001.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Results are available at
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04739761
Download to PDF