Trial Review

The ANZCTR website is back online for trial registration and updates. We apologise for any inconvenience caused while the site was inactive.


With activity expected to increase on the ANZCTR again, there may be extended wait times while we process pending studies, with priority being given to those trials submitted in February. Thank you for your patience.


Reset your password and enable multi-factor authentication (MFA)


For ANZCTR account holders: to help ensure the cyber safety of your account, you’ll need to reset your password and set-up multi-factor authentication (MFA) as per the instructions below.


  1. Go to the Login page, click ‘reset password’ and follow the instructions.
  2. Check your email for the link to set a new password.
  3. Create a new password that meets requirements.
  4. Return to the Login page and enter your new password. A verification code will be sent to your email.
  5. Check your email for the code and enter it on the Login page. If the code is entered incorrectly, you can re-enter the correct one or request a new one.

Learn more about MFA and its importance on the Australian Signals Directorate website.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov

For full trial details, please see the original record at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00410410




Registration number
NCT00410410
Ethics application status
Date submitted
11/12/2006
Date registered
12/12/2006
Date last updated
24/03/2015

Titles & IDs
Public title
A Study of Abatacept in Patients With Active Ulcerative Colitis
Scientific title
A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Induction and Maintenance Therapy With Abatacept in Subjects With Active Ulcerative Colitis (UC) Who Have Had an Inadequate Clinical Response and/or Intolerance to Medical Therapy
Secondary ID [1] 0 0
IM101-108
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Ulcerative Colitis 0 0
Condition category
Condition code
Oral and Gastrointestinal 0 0 0 0
Other diseases of the mouth, teeth, oesophagus, digestive system including liver and colon
Inflammatory and Immune System 0 0 0 0
Other inflammatory or immune system disorders
Oral and Gastrointestinal 0 0 0 0
Inflammatory bowel disease

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - abatacept (ABA)
Treatment: Drugs - placebo
Treatment: Drugs - abatacept

Experimental: Abatacept (ABA) - Induction Period; 3 arms for Cohort 1: ABA 30/\~10 mg/kg (ABA administered at 30 mg/kg followed by ABA at \~10 mg/kg), ABA \~10 mg/kg, ABA 3 mg/kg

Induction Period; 2 arms for Cohort 2: ABA 30/\~10 mg/kg and Second Cohort ABA \~10 mg/kg

1 arm for maintenance period (ABA \~10 mg/kg)

Placebo comparator: Placebo - 1 arm for induction period

1 arm for maintenance period

Other: abatacept - 1 arm for open-label extension phase (ABA \~10 mg/kg)


Treatment: Drugs: abatacept (ABA)
Dextrose 5% in water, IV. Placebo on days IP-1, IP-15,IP-29, IP-57; 3 mg/kg on days IP-1, IP-15,IP-29, IP-57; 10 mg/kg on days IP-1, IP-15,IP-29, IP-57; or 30 mg/kg on days IP-1,IP-15 and \~10 mg/kg on days IP-29, IP-57 (ABA 30/\~10 mg/kg Group).

Induction Period 3 months

Maintenance Period 12 months

Treatment: Drugs: placebo
Normal saline, IV, 0 mg/kg, every 28 days.

Induction Period 3 months

Maintenance Period 12 months

Treatment: Drugs: abatacept
\~10 mg/kg, once monthly

Open- Label Extension Period until the drug is marketed for UC or the UC development program for abatacept is discontinued
Intervention code [1] 0 0
Treatment: Drugs
Comparator / control treatment
Control group

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 0 0
Induction Period (IP); Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP Cohort 1 (IP1C)
Assessment method [1] 0 0
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. A clinical response is defined as a reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of = 3 points and = 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of = 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of = 1 point.
Timepoint [1] 0 0
Week 12 (Day IP-85)
Primary outcome [2] 0 0
Maintenance Period (MP); Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Month 12
Assessment method [2] 0 0
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. A clinical response is defined as a reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of = 3 points and = 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of = 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of = 1 point.
Timepoint [2] 0 0
Month 12 (Day MP-365)
Primary outcome [3] 0 0
Open-Label Extension Period (OL); Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation
Assessment method [3] 0 0
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Related AE=relationship of certain, probable, possible, or missing. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event.
Timepoint [3] 0 0
Day OL-1 through the end of the OL
Primary outcome [4] 0 0
OL; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Assessment method [4] 0 0
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs of special interest are those AEs that may be associated with the use of immunomodulatory drugs, including all infections, serious infections, and opportunistic infections; autoimmune disorders; neoplasms; acute infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 1 hour of start of infusion) and peri-infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 24 hours of the start of infusion).
Timepoint [4] 0 0
Day OL-1 through Day OL-729
Primary outcome [5] 0 0
OL; Number of Participants With Physical Examination Findings
Assessment method [5] 0 0
Complete physical examination was obtained at the Screening Visit, Day MP-365, and OL Final Visit/Early Termination visits. Interim physical examinations were performed at other study visits. Interim physical exam were not as comprehensive as the initial full examination but did note any changes in the participant's condition since the last assessment and did not preclude examination of any of the body systems as clinically indicated. Participants were observed for AEs and vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, and temperature).
Timepoint [5] 0 0
Day OL-1 through Day OL-729
Primary outcome [6] 0 0
OL; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
Assessment method [6] 0 0
High=greater than Upper Normal Limit (ULN), Low=lower than Lower Normal Limit (LLN). LLN/ULN= Hemoglobin (HGB): \>3 g/dL decrease from Baseline (BL); Hematocrit: \<0.75 x BL; Erythrocytes: \<0.75 x BL; Platelets (PLT): \<0.67 x LLN/\>1.5 x ULN; Leukocytes: \<0.75 x LLN/ \>1.25 x ULN; neutrophils+bands: \<1.0 x 10\^3 c/uL; eosinophils: \>0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL; monocytes: \>2000 mm3; lymphocytes: \<0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL/ \>7.50 x 10\^3 c/uL.
Timepoint [6] 0 0
Day OL-1 through Day OL-729
Primary outcome [7] 0 0
OL; Number of Participants With Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities
Assessment method [7] 0 0
Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= Alkaline phosphatase (ALP): \>2 x ULN; aspartate aminotransferase (AST): \>3 x ULN; alanine aminotransferase (ALT): \>3 x ULN; G-Glutamyl transferase (GGT): \>2 x ULN; Bilirubin: \>2 x ULN; blood urea nitrogen (BUN): \>2 x BL; creatinine: \>4 x BL; potassium (K): \<0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; calcium (Ca): \<0.8 x LLN/\>1.2 x ULN; phosphorous (P): \<0.75 x LLN/ \>1.2 5 x ULN
Timepoint [7] 0 0
Day OL-1 through Day OL-729
Primary outcome [8] 0 0
OL; Number of Participants With Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities
Assessment method [8] 0 0
Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= serum glucose (Glu): \<65 mg/dL/ \>220 mg/dL; fasting serum Glu: \<0.8 x LLN/ \>1.5 x ULN; total protein: \< 0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; albumin:\<0.9 x LLN; uric acid: \>1.5 x ULN. For Urinalysis (Urine protein, urine Glu, urine blood, leukocyte esterase, Red Blood Cells \[RBCs\], White Blood Cells \[WBCs\]): Use =2 when BL value missing or value =4, or when pre-dose=0 or 0.5. Use =3 when pre-dose=1. Use =4 when pre-dose=2 or 3
Timepoint [8] 0 0
Day OL-1 through Day OL-729
Secondary outcome [1] 0 0
IP; Baseline Mayo Score: IP1C
Assessment method [1] 0 0
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. A clinical response is defined as a reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of = 3 points and = 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of = 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of = 1 point.
Timepoint [1] 0 0
Baseline
Secondary outcome [2] 0 0
IP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP1C
Assessment method [2] 0 0
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of = 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point.
Timepoint [2] 0 0
Week 12 (Day IP-85)
Secondary outcome [3] 0 0
IP; Number of Participants in Mucosal Healing (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12: IP1C
Assessment method [3] 0 0
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Mucosal healing was defined as endoscopic subscore = 1 point
Timepoint [3] 0 0
Week 12 (Day IP-85)
Secondary outcome [4] 0 0
IP; Number of Participants With Clinical Response (Per Mayo Score) at Week 12 Analyzed by Cochran-Armitage Trend Test for Dose-Response Relationship: IP1C
Assessment method [4] 0 0
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. A clinical response is defined as a reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of = 3 points and = 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of = 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of = 1 point.
Timepoint [4] 0 0
Week 12 (Day IP-85)
Secondary outcome [5] 0 0
IP; Baseline Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Score: IP1C
Assessment method [5] 0 0
The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) was used to measure disease specific quality of life. The IBDQ consists of a self-administered 32-item questionnaire that evaluates quality of life across 4 dimensional scores: Bowel, Systemic, Social and Emotional. The response to each question can range from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating severe problem and 7 indicating normal health. The total IBDQ is computed as the sum of the responses to the individual IBDQ questions. The total score can range between 32 to 224 with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
Timepoint [5] 0 0
Baseline
Secondary outcome [6] 0 0
IP; Mean Change From Baseline To Week 12 in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ): IP1C
Assessment method [6] 0 0
The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) was used to measure disease specific quality of life. The IBDQ consists of a self-administered 32-item questionnaire that evaluates quality of life across 4 dimensional scores: Bowel, Systemic, Social and Emotional. The response to each question can range from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating severe problem and 7 indicating normal health. The total IBDQ is computed as the sum of the responses to the individual IBDQ questions. The total score can range between 32 to 224 with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
Timepoint [6] 0 0
Baseline (Day IP-1), Day IP-85 (Week 12)
Secondary outcome [7] 0 0
IP; Number of Participants With Mayo Rectal Bleeding Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (=1 Point) at Week 12: IP1C
Assessment method [7] 0 0
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. An absolute rectal bleeding subscore of =1 point was indicative of mild disease.
Timepoint [7] 0 0
Day IP-85 (Week 12)
Secondary outcome [8] 0 0
IP; Number of Participants With Mayo Stool Frequency Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (=1 Point) at Week 12: IP1C
Assessment method [8] 0 0
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. An absolute stool frequency subscore of =1 point was indicative of mild disease.
Timepoint [8] 0 0
Day IP-85 (Week 12)
Secondary outcome [9] 0 0
IP; Number of Participants With Mayo Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (=1 Point) at Week 12: IP1C
Assessment method [9] 0 0
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. An absolute PGA subscore of =1 point was indicative of mild disease.
Timepoint [9] 0 0
Day IP-85 (Week 12)
Secondary outcome [10] 0 0
IP; Number of Participants Who Are Anti-TNF-Inadequate Responders/Anti-TNF Intolerant With Clinical Response At Week 12 Analyzed by Cochran-Armitage Trend Test for Dose-Response Relationship: IP1C
Assessment method [10] 0 0
The Mayo Scoring system (range 0-12 points, high scores=greater severity of disease) is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Clinical response=reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of = 3 points and = 30%, with accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of = 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of = 1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance=inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for =8 weeks.
Timepoint [10] 0 0
Week 12 (Day IP-85)
Secondary outcome [11] 0 0
IP; Number of Participants With Clinical Response At Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1C
Assessment method [11] 0 0
The Mayo Scoring system (range 0-12 points, high scores=greater severity of disease) is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Clinical response=reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of = 3 points and = 30%, with accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of = 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of = 1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance=inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for =8 weeks.
Timepoint [11] 0 0
Week 12 (Day IP-85)
Secondary outcome [12] 0 0
IP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission at Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1C
Assessment method [12] 0 0
The Mayo Scoring system (range 0-12 points, high scores=greater severity of disease) is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of = 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance =inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for =8 weeks.
Timepoint [12] 0 0
Week 12 (Day IP-85)
Secondary outcome [13] 0 0
IP; Number of Participants in Mucosal Healing at Week 12 Among Participants With Anti-TNF (Infliximab) Failure/Intolerance: IP1C
Assessment method [13] 0 0
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Mucosal healing was defined as endoscopic subscore = 1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance = inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for =8 weeks.
Timepoint [13] 0 0
Week 12 (Day IP-85)
Secondary outcome [14] 0 0
IP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation: IP1C + IP2C
Assessment method [14] 0 0
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Related AE=relationship of certain, probable, possible, or missing. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event.
Timepoint [14] 0 0
Day IP-1 through Day IP-85
Secondary outcome [15] 0 0
IP; Number of Participants With AEs Of Special Interest: IP1C + IP2C
Assessment method [15] 0 0
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs of special interest are those AEs that may be associated with the use of immunomodulatory drugs, including all infections, serious infections, and opportunistic infections; autoimmune disorders; neoplasms; acute infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 1 hour of start of infusion) and peri-infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 24 hours of the start of infusion).
Timepoint [15] 0 0
Day IP-1 through Day IP-85
Secondary outcome [16] 0 0
IP; Number of Participants With Physical Examination Findings: IP1C + IP2C
Assessment method [16] 0 0
Complete physical examination was obtained at the Screening Visit, Day MP-365, and OL Final Visit/Early Termination visits. Interim physical examinations were performed at other study visits. Interim physical exam were not as comprehensive as the initial full examination but did note any changes in the participant's condition since the last assessment and did not preclude examination of any of the body systems as clinically indicated. Participants were observed for AEs and vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, and temperature).
Timepoint [16] 0 0
Day IP-1 through Day IP-85
Secondary outcome [17] 0 0
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
Assessment method [17] 0 0
High=greater than Upper Normal Limit (ULN), Low=lower than Lower Normal Limit (LLN). LLN/ULN= Hemoglobin (HGB): \>3 g/dL decrease from Baseline (BL); Hematocrit: \<0.75 x BL; Erythrocytes: \<0.75 x BL; Platelets (PLT): \<0.67 x LLN/\>1.5 x ULN; Leukocytes: \<0.75 x LLN/ \>1.25 x ULN; neutrophils+bands: \<1.0 x 10\^3 c/uL; eosinophils: \>0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL; monocytes: \>2000 mm3; lymphocytes: \<0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL/ \>7.50 x 10\^3 c/uL.
Timepoint [17] 0 0
Day IP-1 through Day IP-85
Secondary outcome [18] 0 0
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Liver and Kidney Function and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
Assessment method [18] 0 0
Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= Alkaline phosphatase (ALP): \>2 x ULN; aspartate aminotransferase (AST): \>3 x ULN; alanine aminotransferase (ALT): \>3 x ULN; G-Glutamyl transferase (GGT): \>2 x ULN; Bilirubin: \>2 x ULN; blood urea nitrogen (BUN): \>2 x BL; creatinine: \>4 x BL; Sodium (Na): \<0.95 x LLN/ \>1.05 x ULN; potassium (K): \<0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; calcium (Ca): \<0.8 x LLN/\>1.2 x ULN; phosphorous (P): \<0.75 x LLN/ \>1.2 5 x ULN
Timepoint [18] 0 0
Day IP-1 through Day IP-85
Secondary outcome [19] 0 0
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP1C
Assessment method [19] 0 0
Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= serum glucose (Glu): \<65 mg/dL/ \>220 mg/dL; total protein: \< 0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; albumin:\<0.9 x LLN; uric acid: \>1.5 x ULN. For Urinalysis (Urine protein, urine Glu, urine blood, leukocyte esterase, Red Blood Cells \[RBCs\], White Blood Cells \[WBCs\]): Use =2 when BL value missing or value =4, or when pre-dose=0 or 0.5. Use =3 when pre-dose=1. Use =4 when pre-dose=2 or 3
Timepoint [19] 0 0
Day IP-1 through Day IP-85
Secondary outcome [20] 0 0
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology, Liver and Kidney Function, and Electrolyte Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
Assessment method [20] 0 0
High=greater than Upper Normal Limit (ULN), Low=lower than Lower Normal Limit (LLN). LLN/ULN= Hemoglobin (HGB): \>3 g/dL decrease from Baseline (BL); Hematocrit: \<0.75 x BL; Erythrocytes: \<0.75 x BL; Platelets (PLT): \<0.67 x LLN/\>1.5 x ULN; Leukocytes: \<0.75 x LLN/ \>1.25 x ULN; eosinophils: \>0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL; monocytes: \>2000 mm3; lymphocytes: \<0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL/ \>7.50 x 10\^3 c/uL; blood urea nitrogen (BUN): \>2 x BL; creatinine: \>4 x BL; Sodium (Na): \<0.95 x LLN/ \>1.05 x ULN; potassium (K): \<0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; phosphorous (P): \<0.75 x LLN/ \>1.2 5 x ULN;
Timepoint [20] 0 0
Day IP-1 through Day IP-85
Secondary outcome [21] 0 0
IP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities: IP2C
Assessment method [21] 0 0
Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= serum glucose (Glu): \<65 mg/dL/ \>220 mg/dL; total protein: \< 0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; albumin:\<0.9 x LLN. For Urinalysis (Urine protein, urine Glu, urine blood, leukocyte esterase, Red Blood Cells \[RBCs\], White Blood Cells \[WBCs\]): Use =2 when BL value missing or value =4, or when pre-dose=0 or 0.5. Use =3 when pre-dose=1. Use =4 when pre-dose=2 or 3
Timepoint [21] 0 0
Day IP-1 through Day IP-85
Secondary outcome [22] 0 0
IP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies: IP1C + IP2C
Assessment method [22] 0 0
A electrochemiluminescent immunoassay screened sera for drug-specific antibodies, immunocompetition was used to identify specific anti-Abatacept reactivity. CTLA4 and Possibly Ig category=reactivity against extracellular domain of human CTLA4, constant regions of human IgG1, or both (CTLA4Ig; Abatacept molecule). Ig and/or Junction category=reactivity against constant regions and/or hinge region of human IgG1. Drug-induced seropositivity was defined as a post-baseline titer higher than Baseline, or any post-baseline positivity if Baseline value was missing.
Timepoint [22] 0 0
For participants treated in MP: Day IP-1 (Baseline) to Day MP-1 (Day IP-85). For participants treated in OL directly after IP: Day IP-1 to Day OL-1. For participants treated only in IP: All measurements after Day IP-1 (including follow-up visits)
Secondary outcome [23] 0 0
MP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission at Month 12
Assessment method [23] 0 0
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of = 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point.
Timepoint [23] 0 0
Month 12 (Day MP-365)
Secondary outcome [24] 0 0
MP; Number of Participants With Mayo Endoscopic Subscores Indicating Mucosal Healing (=1 Point) at Month 12
Assessment method [24] 0 0
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Mucosal healing was defined as endoscopic subscore = 1 point
Timepoint [24] 0 0
Month 12 (Day MP-365)
Secondary outcome [25] 0 0
MP; Number of Participants in Clinical Remission at Both Month 6 and Month 12
Assessment method [25] 0 0
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of = 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point.
Timepoint [25] 0 0
Month 6 (Day MP-169), Month 12 (Day MP-365)
Secondary outcome [26] 0 0
MP; Number of Participants With Baseline Oral Corticosteroid Use Who Have Discontinued Corticosteroids and Achieved Clinical Remission by Month 12
Assessment method [26] 0 0
Baseline corticosteroids equivalent of =30 mg prednisone daily. The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater frequency or severity. Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of = 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point.
Timepoint [26] 0 0
Day MP-365 (Month 12)
Secondary outcome [27] 0 0
MP; Mean Change From Baseline to Month 12 in IBDQ
Assessment method [27] 0 0
The Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) was used to measure disease specific quality of life. The IBDQ consists of a self-administered 32-item questionnaire that evaluates quality of life across 4 dimensional scores: Bowel, Systemic, Social and Emotional. The response to each question can range from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating severe problem and 7 indicating normal health. The total IBDQ is computed as the sum of the responses to the individual IBDQ questions. The total score can range between 32 to 224 with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
Timepoint [27] 0 0
Day MP-365
Secondary outcome [28] 0 0
MP; Mean Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Short Form-36 (SF-36)
Assessment method [28] 0 0
The SF-36 is a validated instrument to measure health-related quality of life across multiple disease states. Individual subscale scores and 2 summary scores are calculated: (1) physical component summary (PCS) which includes physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, and general health; (2) mental component summary (MCS) which includes vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight, with values ranging from worse health (0) to best health (100).
Timepoint [28] 0 0
Day MP-365
Secondary outcome [29] 0 0
MP; Number of Participants With Baseline Oral Corticosteroid Use Who Have Discontinued Corticosteroids for 90 Consecutive Days and Achieved Clinical Remission by Month 12
Assessment method [29] 0 0
Baseline corticosteroids equivalent of =30 mg prednisone daily. The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater frequency or severity. Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of = 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point.
Timepoint [29] 0 0
Day MP-365 (Month 12)
Secondary outcome [30] 0 0
MP; Number of Participants With Mayo Rectal Bleeding Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (=1 Point) at Month 12
Assessment method [30] 0 0
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. An absolute rectal bleeding subscore of =1 point was indicative of mild disease.
Timepoint [30] 0 0
Day MP-365 (Month 12)
Secondary outcome [31] 0 0
MP; Number of Participants With Mayo Stool Frequency Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (=1 Point) at Month 12
Assessment method [31] 0 0
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. An absolute stool frequency subscore of =1 point was indicative of mild disease.
Timepoint [31] 0 0
Day MP-365 (Month 12)
Secondary outcome [32] 0 0
MP; Number of Participants With Mayo PGA Subscores Indicating Mild Disease (=1 Point) at Month 12
Assessment method [32] 0 0
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. An absolute PGA subscore of =1 point was indicative of mild disease.
Timepoint [32] 0 0
Day MP-365 (Month 12)
Secondary outcome [33] 0 0
MP; Number of Participants With Clinical Response at Month 12 Among Participants With Inadequate Response/Intolerance to Prior Anti-TNF Therapy (Infliximab)
Assessment method [33] 0 0
The Mayo Scoring system (range 0-12 points, high scores=greater severity of disease) is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Clinical response=reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of = 3 points and = 30%, with accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of = 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of = 1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance=inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for =8 weeks.
Timepoint [33] 0 0
Month 12 (Day MP-365)
Secondary outcome [34] 0 0
MP; Number of Participants With Clinical Remission at Month 12 Among Participants With Inadequate Response/Intolerance to Prior Anti-TNF Therapy (Infliximab)
Assessment method [34] 0 0
The Mayo Scoring system (range 0-12 points, high scores=greater severity of disease) is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of = 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance =inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for =8 weeks.
Timepoint [34] 0 0
Month 12 (Day MP-365)
Secondary outcome [35] 0 0
MP; Number of Participants With Clinical Mucosal Healing at Month 12 Among Participants With Inadequate Response/Intolerance to Prior Anti-TNF Therapy (Infliximab)
Assessment method [35] 0 0
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Mucosal healing was defined as endoscopic subscore =1 point. Inadequate response/intolerance = inadequate response/intolerance to an approved anti-TNF agent prior to this study at an approved labeled dose for =8 weeks.
Timepoint [35] 0 0
Month 12 (Day MP-365)
Secondary outcome [36] 0 0
MP; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies
Assessment method [36] 0 0
A electrochemiluminescent immunoassay screened sera for drug-specific antibodies, immunocompetition was used to identify specific anti-Abatacept reactivity. CTLA4 and Possibly Ig category=reactivity against extracellular domain of human CTLA4, constant regions of human IgG1, or both (CTLA4Ig; Abatacept molecule). Ig and/or Junction category=reactivity against constant regions and/or hinge region of human IgG1. Drug-induced seropositivity was defined as a post-baseline titer higher than Baseline, or any post-baseline positivity if Baseline value was missing.
Timepoint [36] 0 0
For participants not entering OL: All measurements starting after Day MP-1 (including follow-up visits). For participants entering OL: From first measurement after Day MP-1 to Day MP-365 (Day OL-1).
Secondary outcome [37] 0 0
MP; Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Related AEs, Deaths, Serious AEs (SAEs), Related SAEs, and AEs Leading to Discontinuation
Assessment method [37] 0 0
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Related AE=relationship of certain, probable, possible, or missing. SAE=any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event.
Timepoint [37] 0 0
Day MP-1 through Day MP-365
Secondary outcome [38] 0 0
MP; Number of Participants With AEs of Special Interest
Assessment method [38] 0 0
AE=any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs of special interest are those AEs that may be associated with the use of immunomodulatory drugs, including all infections, serious infections, and opportunistic infections; autoimmune disorders; neoplasms; acute infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 1 hour of start of infusion) and peri-infusional AEs (pre-specified AEs occurring within 24 hours of the start of infusion).
Timepoint [38] 0 0
Day MP-1 through Day MP-365
Secondary outcome [39] 0 0
MP; Number of Participants With Physical Examination Findings
Assessment method [39] 0 0
Complete physical examination was obtained at the Screening Visit, Day MP-365, and OL Final Visit/Early Termination visits. Interim physical examinations were performed at other study visits. Interim physical exam were not as comprehensive as the initial full examination but did note any changes in the participant's condition since the last assessment and did not preclude examination of any of the body systems as clinically indicated. Participants were observed for AEs and vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, and temperature).
Timepoint [39] 0 0
Day IP-85 through Day MP-365
Secondary outcome [40] 0 0
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Hematology Laboratory Abnormalities
Assessment method [40] 0 0
High=greater than ULN, Low=lower than LLN. LLN/ULN= HGB: \>3 g/dL decrease from Baseline (BL); Hematocrit: \<0.75 x BL; Erythrocytes: \<0.75 x BL; PLT: \<0.67 x LLN/\>1.5 x ULN; Leukocytes: \<0.75 x LLN/ \>1.25 x ULN; neutrophils+bands: \<1.0 x 10\^3 c/uL; eosinophils: \>0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL; monocytes: \>2000 mm3; lymphocytes: \<0.750 x 10\^3 c/uL/ \>7.50 x 10\^3 c/uL; GGT: \>2 x ULN; Bilirubin: \>2 x ULN; BUN: \>2 x BL; Na: \<0.95 x LLN/ \>1.05 x ULN; K: \<0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; Ca: \<0.8 x LLN/\>1.2 x ULN
Timepoint [40] 0 0
Day IP-85 through Day MP-365
Secondary outcome [41] 0 0
MP; Number of Participants With Marked Chemistry and Urinalysis Laboratory Abnormalities
Assessment method [41] 0 0
Low=lower than LLN, High=greater than ULN. LLN/ULN= serum glucose (Glu): \<65 mg/dL/ \>220 mg/dL; fasting serum Glu: \<0.8 x LLN/ \>1.5 x ULN; total protein: \< 0.9 x LLN/ \>1.1 x ULN; albumin:\<0.9 x LLN; uric acid: \>1.5 x ULN. For Urinalysis (Urine protein, urine Glu, urine blood, leukocyte esterase, Red Blood Cells \[RBCs\], White Blood Cells \[WBCs\]): Use =2 when BL value missing or value =4, or when pre-dose=0 or 0.5. Use =3 when pre-dose=1. Use =4 when pre-dose=2 or 3
Timepoint [41] 0 0
Day IP-85 through Day MP-365
Secondary outcome [42] 0 0
OL; Number of Participants With Clinical Response Over Time
Assessment method [42] 0 0
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. A clinical response is defined as a reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of = 3 points and = 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of = 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of = 1 point.
Timepoint [42] 0 0
Day OL-1 through Day OL-729
Secondary outcome [43] 0 0
OL; Number of Participants With Clinical Remission Over Time
Assessment method [43] 0 0
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Clinical remission is defined as a Mayo score of = 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point.
Timepoint [43] 0 0
Day OL-1 through Day OL-729
Secondary outcome [44] 0 0
OL; Number of Participants With Mayo Endoscopic Subscores Indicating Mucosal Healing (=1 Point) During OL
Assessment method [44] 0 0
The Mayo Scoring system ranges from 0 - 12 points and is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Higher Mayo scores indicate greater severity of disease. Mucosal healing was defined as endoscopic subscore = 1 point
Timepoint [44] 0 0
Open-Label Period (Day OL-1 through Day OL-729)
Secondary outcome [45] 0 0
OL; Number of Participants With Clinical Response or Clinical Remission Upon Retreatment With Abatacept Among Those Who Received Abatacept in the IP or MP Period
Assessment method [45] 0 0
The Mayo Scoring system (range 0-12 points, high scores=greater severity of disease) is a composite index consisting of 4 disease variables (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy evaluation, and Physician's Global Assessment). Clinical response=reduction from baseline in the Mayo score of = 3 points and = 30%, with accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of = 1 point or absolute rectal bleeding subscore of = 1 point. Clinical remission = Mayo score of = 2 points with no individual subscore exceeding 1 point. Change from Baseline= post-Baseline - Baseline value.
Timepoint [45] 0 0
Last Study Visit (Day OL-729)
Secondary outcome [46] 0 0
OL; Number of Participants With Abatacept-Induced Antibodies
Assessment method [46] 0 0
A electrochemiluminescent immunoassay screened sera for drug-specific antibodies, immunocompetition was used to identify specific anti-Abatacept reactivity. CTLA4 and Possibly Ig category=reactivity against extracellular domain of human CTLA4, constant regions of human IgG1, or both (CTLA4Ig; Abatacept molecule). Ig and/or Junction category=reactivity against constant regions and/or hinge region of human IgG1. Drug-induced seropositivity was defined as a post-baseline titer higher than Baseline, or any post-baseline positivity if Baseline value was missing.
Timepoint [46] 0 0
For participants receiving OL medication, all measurements starting after Day OL-1 (including follow-up visits and at 56 and 85 days after last dose)
Secondary outcome [47] 0 0
OL; Number of Participants Using Corticosteroids During OL
Assessment method [47] 0 0
Participants taking oral corticosteroids (equivalent of = 30 mg prednisone daily) must have met minimum treatment duration at entry into IP and had stable dose for =2 weeks prior to entry into the IP.
Timepoint [47] 0 0
Day OL-1 through Day OL-729

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Men or women 18 years or older
* Ulcerative colitis for at lease 3 months
* Moderate to severe active ulcerative colitis
* Inadequate response or intolerance to standard ulcerative colitis treatment
Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
No limit
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria

Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s


The people analysing the results/data
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Other design features
Phase
Phase 3
Type of endpoint/s
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Data analysis
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
1/12/2006
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
1/11/2009
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
591
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
ACT,NSW,QLD,SA,TAS,VIC,WA
Recruitment hospital [1] 0 0
Local Institution - Garran
Recruitment hospital [2] 0 0
Local Institution - Camperdown
Recruitment hospital [3] 0 0
Local Institution - Herston
Recruitment hospital [4] 0 0
Local Institution - South Brisbane
Recruitment hospital [5] 0 0
Local Institution - Bedford Park
Recruitment hospital [6] 0 0
Local Institution - Launceston
Recruitment hospital [7] 0 0
Local Institution - Box Hill
Recruitment hospital [8] 0 0
Local Institution - Fitzroy
Recruitment hospital [9] 0 0
Local Institution - South Ballarat
Recruitment hospital [10] 0 0
Local Institution - Fremantle
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 0 0
2605 - Garran
Recruitment postcode(s) [2] 0 0
2050 - Camperdown
Recruitment postcode(s) [3] 0 0
4029 - Herston
Recruitment postcode(s) [4] 0 0
4101 - South Brisbane
Recruitment postcode(s) [5] 0 0
5042 - Bedford Park
Recruitment postcode(s) [6] 0 0
7250 - Launceston
Recruitment postcode(s) [7] 0 0
3128 - Box Hill
Recruitment postcode(s) [8] 0 0
3065 VIC - Fitzroy
Recruitment postcode(s) [9] 0 0
3350 - South Ballarat
Recruitment postcode(s) [10] 0 0
6160 - Fremantle
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [1] 0 0
Alabama
Country [2] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [2] 0 0
Arizona
Country [3] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [3] 0 0
California
Country [4] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [4] 0 0
Colorado
Country [5] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [5] 0 0
Connecticut
Country [6] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [6] 0 0
Florida
Country [7] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [7] 0 0
Georgia
Country [8] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [8] 0 0
Illinois
Country [9] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [9] 0 0
Kansas
Country [10] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [10] 0 0
Kentucky
Country [11] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [11] 0 0
Louisiana
Country [12] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [12] 0 0
Massachusetts
Country [13] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [13] 0 0
Minnesota
Country [14] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [14] 0 0
Missouri
Country [15] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [15] 0 0
New Jersey
Country [16] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [16] 0 0
New York
Country [17] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [17] 0 0
North Carolina
Country [18] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [18] 0 0
Ohio
Country [19] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [19] 0 0
Oklahoma
Country [20] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [20] 0 0
Pennsylvania
Country [21] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [21] 0 0
South Carolina
Country [22] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [22] 0 0
Tennessee
Country [23] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [23] 0 0
Texas
Country [24] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [24] 0 0
Washington
Country [25] 0 0
Belgium
State/province [25] 0 0
Bruxelles
Country [26] 0 0
Belgium
State/province [26] 0 0
Leuven
Country [27] 0 0
Brazil
State/province [27] 0 0
Bahia
Country [28] 0 0
Brazil
State/province [28] 0 0
Goias
Country [29] 0 0
Brazil
State/province [29] 0 0
Parana
Country [30] 0 0
Brazil
State/province [30] 0 0
Rio Grande Do Sul
Country [31] 0 0
Brazil
State/province [31] 0 0
Sao Paulo
Country [32] 0 0
Brazil
State/province [32] 0 0
Rio De Janeiro
Country [33] 0 0
Canada
State/province [33] 0 0
British Columbia
Country [34] 0 0
Canada
State/province [34] 0 0
Ontario
Country [35] 0 0
Canada
State/province [35] 0 0
Quebec
Country [36] 0 0
Czech Republic
State/province [36] 0 0
Brno - Bohunice
Country [37] 0 0
Czech Republic
State/province [37] 0 0
Ceske Budejovice
Country [38] 0 0
France
State/province [38] 0 0
Amiens Cedex 1
Country [39] 0 0
France
State/province [39] 0 0
Clichy
Country [40] 0 0
France
State/province [40] 0 0
Lille Cedex
Country [41] 0 0
France
State/province [41] 0 0
Nice
Country [42] 0 0
France
State/province [42] 0 0
Paris
Country [43] 0 0
France
State/province [43] 0 0
Pessac
Country [44] 0 0
France
State/province [44] 0 0
Toulouse
Country [45] 0 0
Germany
State/province [45] 0 0
Kiel
Country [46] 0 0
Germany
State/province [46] 0 0
Muenster
Country [47] 0 0
India
State/province [47] 0 0
Andhra Pradesh
Country [48] 0 0
India
State/province [48] 0 0
Kerala
Country [49] 0 0
India
State/province [49] 0 0
Maharashtra
Country [50] 0 0
India
State/province [50] 0 0
Bangalore
Country [51] 0 0
India
State/province [51] 0 0
Delhi
Country [52] 0 0
India
State/province [52] 0 0
Hyderabad
Country [53] 0 0
India
State/province [53] 0 0
Mangalore
Country [54] 0 0
India
State/province [54] 0 0
Manipal
Country [55] 0 0
India
State/province [55] 0 0
Mumbai
Country [56] 0 0
India
State/province [56] 0 0
Mysore
Country [57] 0 0
Ireland
State/province [57] 0 0
Dublin
Country [58] 0 0
Italy
State/province [58] 0 0
Napoli
Country [59] 0 0
Italy
State/province [59] 0 0
Padova
Country [60] 0 0
Italy
State/province [60] 0 0
Roma
Country [61] 0 0
Italy
State/province [61] 0 0
San Giovanni Rotondo
Country [62] 0 0
Korea, Republic of
State/province [62] 0 0
Seoul
Country [63] 0 0
Mexico
State/province [63] 0 0
Coahuila
Country [64] 0 0
Mexico
State/province [64] 0 0
Distrito Federal
Country [65] 0 0
Mexico
State/province [65] 0 0
Jalisco
Country [66] 0 0
Mexico
State/province [66] 0 0
Nuevo Leon
Country [67] 0 0
Mexico
State/province [67] 0 0
Sinaloa
Country [68] 0 0
Mexico
State/province [68] 0 0
Sonora
Country [69] 0 0
Mexico
State/province [69] 0 0
Chihuahua
Country [70] 0 0
Netherlands
State/province [70] 0 0
Amersfoort
Country [71] 0 0
Netherlands
State/province [71] 0 0
Amsterdam
Country [72] 0 0
Netherlands
State/province [72] 0 0
Groningen
Country [73] 0 0
Poland
State/province [73] 0 0
Katowice
Country [74] 0 0
Poland
State/province [74] 0 0
Warszawa
Country [75] 0 0
Poland
State/province [75] 0 0
Wroclaw
Country [76] 0 0
Puerto Rico
State/province [76] 0 0
Ponce
Country [77] 0 0
South Africa
State/province [77] 0 0
Gauteng
Country [78] 0 0
South Africa
State/province [78] 0 0
Kwa Zulu Natal
Country [79] 0 0
South Africa
State/province [79] 0 0
Western Cape
Country [80] 0 0
Switzerland
State/province [80] 0 0
Bern
Country [81] 0 0
Switzerland
State/province [81] 0 0
Zuerich
Country [82] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [82] 0 0
Greater London
Country [83] 0 0
United Kingdom
State/province [83] 0 0
Oxfordshire

Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Name
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Country

Ethics approval
Ethics application status

Summary
Brief summary
Trial website
Trial related presentations / publications
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 0 0
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Address 0 0
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for scientific queries

No information has been provided regarding IPD availability


What supporting documents are/will be available?

No Supporting Document Provided



Results publications and other study-related documents

No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.

Results are available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00410410