Trial Review

Please note the ANZCTR will be unattended from Friday 20 December 2024 for the holidays. The Registry will re-open on Tuesday 7 January 2025. Submissions and updates will not be processed during that time.

Registering a new trial?

To achieve prospective registration, we recommend submitting your trial for registration at the same time as ethics submission.

The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this information for consumers
Trial details imported from ClinicalTrials.gov

For full trial details, please see the original record at https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00372944




Registration number
NCT00372944
Ethics application status
Date submitted
5/09/2006
Date registered
7/09/2006
Date last updated
13/08/2014

Titles & IDs
Public title
AZD6244 vs. Capecitabine (Xeloda®) in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer, Who Have Failed First Line Gemcitabine Therapy
Scientific title
A Phase II, Open, Randomised Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of AZD6244 vs. Capecitabine (Xeloda®) in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer, Who Have Failed First Line Gemcitabine Therapy
Secondary ID [1] 0 0
D1532C00008
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Trial acronym
Linked study record

Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Pancreatic Cancer 0 0
Condition category
Condition code
Cancer 0 0 0 0
Pancreatic

Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Treatment: Drugs - AZD6244
Treatment: Drugs - capecitabine

Active comparator: 1 - Xeloda

Experimental: 2 - AZD6244


Treatment: Drugs: AZD6244
oral capsule

Treatment: Drugs: capecitabine
oral tablet
Intervention code [1] 0 0
Treatment: Drugs
Comparator / control treatment
Control group

Outcomes
Primary outcome [1] 0 0
Median time to death (TTD)
Timepoint [1] 0 0
Data cut off for this analysis was 5th April 2008.
Secondary outcome [1] 0 0
Progression event count
Timepoint [1] 0 0
The mandatory tumour assessment visit (MTAV) occurred on 27th February 2008 (+/-3days)
Secondary outcome [2] 0 0
To assess the safety and tolerability of AZD6244 in the treatment of advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer by review of adverse events (AEs) and laboratory parameters.
Timepoint [2] 0 0
Review of AEs for duration of study, from First Subject in August 2006 to Last Subject Last visit October 2008

Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
* Confirmed with pancreatic cancer
* Have failed first line gemcitabine therapy
Minimum age
18 Years
Maximum age
No limit
Sex
Both males and females
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Key exclusion criteria
* Previous therapy with EGFR inhibitor, MEK inhibitor or capecitabine.
* Any recent surgery, unhealed surgical incision or severe condition such as uncontrolled cardiac disease or chronic gastrointestinal diseases.

Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Who is / are masked / blinded?



Intervention assignment
Parallel
Other design features
Phase
Phase 2
Type of endpoint/s
Statistical methods / analysis

Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Data analysis
Reason for early stopping/withdrawal
Other reasons
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
1/08/2006
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Actual
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Actual
1/10/2008
Sample size
Target
Accrual to date
Final
70
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
Recruitment hospital [1] 0 0
Research Site - Heidelburg
Recruitment postcode(s) [1] 0 0
- Heidelburg
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [1] 0 0
California
Country [2] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [2] 0 0
Florida
Country [3] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [3] 0 0
Maryland
Country [4] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [4] 0 0
Michigan
Country [5] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [5] 0 0
New York
Country [6] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [6] 0 0
Tennessee
Country [7] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [7] 0 0
Texas
Country [8] 0 0
United States of America
State/province [8] 0 0
Washington
Country [9] 0 0
Bulgaria
State/province [9] 0 0
Plovdiv
Country [10] 0 0
Bulgaria
State/province [10] 0 0
Sofia
Country [11] 0 0
Bulgaria
State/province [11] 0 0
Varna
Country [12] 0 0
Hungary
State/province [12] 0 0
Budapest
Country [13] 0 0
Romania
State/province [13] 0 0
Cluj-Napoca

Funding & Sponsors
Primary sponsor type
Commercial sector/industry
Name
AstraZeneca
Address
Country

Ethics approval
Ethics application status

Summary
Brief summary
Trial website
Trial related presentations / publications
Public notes

Contacts
Principal investigator
Name 0 0
Emerging Oncology Medical Science Director, MD
Address 0 0
AstraZeneca
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for public queries
Name 0 0
Address 0 0
Country 0 0
Phone 0 0
Fax 0 0
Email 0 0
Contact person for scientific queries

No information has been provided regarding IPD availability


What supporting documents are/will be available?

No Supporting Document Provided



Results publications and other study-related documents

No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.

Results not provided in https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00372944