Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
A database of clinical trials and their results from Australia, New Zealand, and other countries.
account_circle
Log in
to register or update your trial
search
Search for trials
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12625001084471
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
8/09/2025
Date registered
3/10/2025
Date last updated
3/10/2025
Date data sharing statement initially provided
3/10/2025
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Home strengthening exercise for knee osteoarthritis: the FRESH randomised controlled trial
Query!
Scientific title
FREquency of Strength Home exercises for knee osteoarthritis: the FRESH non-inferiority randomised controlled trial
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
315182
0
None
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
FRESH
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Knee osteoarthritis
338626
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Musculoskeletal
334921
334921
0
0
Query!
Osteoarthritis
Query!
Physical Medicine / Rehabilitation
334922
334922
0
0
Query!
Physiotherapy
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Participants will be randomly assigned a physiotherapist (stratified by group allocation—‘once’ or ‘three’ times weekly exercise group using random permuted block sizes), and research staff will book one consultation appointment on behalf of the participant.
Each participant will have one online consultation (within 1-week post-randomisation, 30 minutes each) with the randomly allocated physiotherapist to prescribe a home strength program that participants will be asked to undertake for 3 months. Physiotherapists will prescribe the same five exercises to each participant. These exercises reflect the typical home strength exercises prescribed in the literature for knee osteoarthritis (OA) and by physiotherapists in Australia. Ahead of the physiotherapy consultations, the research team will post all participants two exercise resistance bands of different strengths (green and blue) along with an exercise booklet.
The trial arms differ in the frequency of exercise prescribed across the week (once versus three times per week). Other dosage parameters will be identical across the treatment groups. Prescription of each home strength program will be the same five standardised exercises, each to be performed as 3 sets of 12 reps, with 1-3 minutes rest between sets. The days home exercises are performed each week are up to the participants discretion.
The physiotherapist will individualise the colour of the exercise band (green or blue) for the seated knee extension exercise and the side leg raises in standing exercise to ensure the participant is working as close as possible to an intensity of 5-7 out of ten (hard to very hard) on the modified Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale for strength training. Based on the Borg scale, the physiotherapist may also decide that an exercise band is not needed for one or both of these exercises. Physiotherapists will verbally advise participants whether they should perform their prescribed program once or three times per week (based on allocation), and this information will also be included in the participant’s exercise booklet. After the consultation, the physiotherapist will instruct the participant to perform the exercise program until their follow-up assessment at 3 months post-randomisation. Participants will be permitted to continue with their usual joint pain medications during that time.
Consultations will occur via the video-conferencing facility of Zoom, a commercial cloud-based system accessible from any internet-connected computer, laptop or mobile device. Physiotherapists will consult from their clinic with participants based at home or wherever is suitable (e.g., work). Physiotherapists will be provided access to a website containing a video library of exercises to allow them to provide real-time demonstrations of exercises to participants. This will be shared with participants via a shared-screen feature on Zoom, allowing them to view a demonstration of the exercise during the consultation.
Semi-structured electronic consultation notes will be recorded by the physiotherapist and submitted to the research staff after the consultation. Notes will be scrutinised by research staff for physiotherapist fidelity to allocated exercise frequency. Participants will complete a one week log book recording their exercises in weeks 4, 8 and 12 with the data submitted to the researchers.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
331810
0
Rehabilitation
Query!
Intervention code [2]
331811
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
The study is comparing the same exercise program performed either three times per week or once per week.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
342561
0
Self-reported severity of knee pain during walking over the past week
Query!
Assessment method [1]
342561
0
An 11-point numerical rating scale
Query!
Timepoint [1]
342561
0
Baseline & 3 months after randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
451305
0
Self-reported knee pain severity
Query!
Assessment method [1]
451305
0
Western Ontario & McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain sub-scale
Query!
Timepoint [1]
451305
0
Baseline & 3 months after randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
451306
0
Self-reported physical function
Query!
Assessment method [2]
451306
0
Western Ontario & McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) physical function sub-scale
Query!
Timepoint [2]
451306
0
Baseline & 3 months after randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
451307
0
Quality of life
Query!
Assessment method [3]
451307
0
Assessment of Quality of Life II Instrument (6D version)
Query!
Timepoint [3]
451307
0
Baseline & 3 months after randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
451308
0
Self-efficacy
Query!
Assessment method [4]
451308
0
Using the 8-item Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale
Query!
Timepoint [4]
451308
0
Baseline & 3 months after randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
451309
0
Exercise self efficacy
Query!
Assessment method [5]
451309
0
Self-efficacy for Exercise Scale
Query!
Timepoint [5]
451309
0
Baseline & 3 months after randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
451310
0
Global rating of change in the knee overall
Query!
Assessment method [6]
451310
0
Scored using a 7-point global rating of change Likert scale with response options ranging from “much worse” to “much better” when compared to baseline.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
451310
0
3 months after randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
451311
0
Physical function
Query!
Assessment method [7]
451311
0
Patient-specific functional scale. Participants indicate up to three activities that performance was limited in the previous week and rate these for physical function on a 11-point NRS.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
451311
0
Baseline & 3 months after randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
451313
0
Patient acceptance of symptoms
Query!
Assessment method [8]
451313
0
Participants will answer (Acceptable or Unacceptable) to the following question: Think about all the consequences of your knee problems in the last week. If you were to remain for the rest of your life as you were during the last week, would the current state be acceptable or unacceptable for you?
Query!
Timepoint [8]
451313
0
3 months after randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
451314
0
Quadriceps strength
Query!
Assessment method [9]
451314
0
The 30 second chair stand test administered over Zoom
Query!
Timepoint [9]
451314
0
Baseline & 3 months after randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
451315
0
Calf strength
Query!
Assessment method [10]
451315
0
The double leg calf raise test administered over Zoom
Query!
Timepoint [10]
451315
0
Baseline & 3 months after randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
451316
0
Willingness to undergo knee joint replacement surgery
Query!
Assessment method [11]
451316
0
Participants will answer (Yes or No) to the question, “Are your knee joint symptoms so severe that you wish to undergo surgery?"
Query!
Timepoint [11]
451316
0
Baseline & 3 months after randomisation
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
i) meet the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence clinical criteria for OA
i. age 45 years or older;
ii. activity-related knee joint pain;
iii. no morning knee stiffness or morning knee stiffness duration of less than 30 mins;
ii) report history of knee pain for 3 months or more;
iii) report knee pain on most days of the past month;
iv) report knee pain on walking over the past week of at least 4 on an 11-point (0-10 range) NRS;
v) report difficulty walking or climbing stairs;
vi) have an email address and access to a computer/laptop/tablet/smartphone with webcam and internet connection for Zoom consultation and;
vii) willing to participate in a videoconferencing consultation for their physiotherapy appointment.
Query!
Minimum age
45
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
i) inability to speak or read English;
ii) on waiting list for/planning any knee/hip surgery in the next 6 months;
iii) previous arthroplasty on the affected knee;
iv) undergone knee surgery in either knee in the past 6 months;
v) is undertaking/has undertaken regular strengthening exercise (at least once per week) for knee problems at any stage in the past 6 months;
vi) intending to/planning to commence regular strengthening exercise (at least once per week) for knee problems in the next 3 months;
vii) self-reports (at screening) any inflammatory arthritis (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis);
viii) self-reports (at screening) any neurological condition that impacts their lower limb function;
ix) self-reports (at screening) any unstable/uncontrolled cardiovascular condition that could make exercise unsafe.
x) previously participated in a CHESM clinical trial in the prior four years, or is currently participating in another research study at CHESM or elsewhere.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
The person who will determine if a potential participant is eligible for inclusion in the trial will be unaware, when this decision is made, to which group the participant will be allocated. The randomisation schedule will be concealed in a password protected computer database. A member of our research team will maintain and access the schedule and reveal allocation to the Trial Coordinator as each participant requires randomisation.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
The randomisation schedule will be prepared by the biostatistician (permuted random block sizes) with physiotherapist allocation stratified by group
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
A biostatistician will develop a detailed Statistical Analysis Plan while blinded to intervention allocation. This will be written and published on the CHESM website prior to data analysis commencing.
Sample size is based on detecting non-inferiority of a once-a-week home exercise program prescription relative to a three-times-a-week home exercise program prescription at 3-month post-randomisation. For change in pain, a non-inferiority margin (NIM) of 0.95?NRS points was chosen as this is less than the lowest of the range (1.0–2.0?units) reported as the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) by people with chronic pain, and less than the MCID of 1.8 points (extrapolated from a 100?mm visual analogue scale, VAS67) for OA by clinician consensus. Assuming a standard deviation (SD) of 1.9 NRS points for pain and a correlation of 0.36 between baseline and follow-up,64 15% loss to follow-up, 90% power, and a one-sided 2.5% significance level, we need 89 participants/arm (178 participants total).
Primary analyses will be conducted according to intention-to-treat principles, including all participants according to their allocated study arm, irrespective of adherence.
Data will be managed via REDCap. All analyses will be described a priori in a Statistical Analysis Plan, which will be developed while blinded to group allocation and published on our website before the analyses commence. Between-group differences in mean change (baseline minus 3-month follow-up) in average walking pain (primary outcome) will be compared using linear mixed-effects models, adjusting for the outcome at baseline and including a random effect for physiotherapists. Non-inferiority will be demonstrated if the lower bound of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for the between-group difference (once weekly exercise prescription minus three times weekly exercise prescription) is above -0.95. The 95% CIs correspond to testing a null hypothesis of non-inferiority at a one-sided significance level of 2.5%. Multiple imputation will be used to account for missing data if required (i.e., if >5% missing values for primary outcome at 3 months).
Secondary continuous outcomes will also be analysed using linear mixed-effects models and reported as mean (95% CI) between-group differences, and interpreted relative to a superiority framework since no NIMs have been specified for these outcomes. Binary outcomes will be analysed using logistic mixed effects models with a random effect for physiotherapist, with effects summarised as relative risks and risk differences with corresponding 95% CIs, and interpreted relative to a superiority framework. Exploratory analyses of a priori moderators of treatment effect on the primary outcome will be examined by including an interaction between pre-specified potential moderators and treatment in the linear mixed-effects model, with interpretation using the superiority framework.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
5/11/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
5/05/2027
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
5/08/2027
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
178
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
ACT,NSW,NT,QLD,SA,TAS,WA,VIC
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
319754
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
319754
0
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Investigator Grant
Query!
Address [1]
319754
0
Query!
Country [1]
319754
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
The University of Melbourne
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
322261
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
322261
0
Query!
Address [1]
322261
0
Query!
Country [1]
322261
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
318309
0
University of Melbourne STEMM 1 ethics committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
318309
0
Office of Research Ethics and Integrity. Research, Innovation & Commercialisation. The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia.
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
318309
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
318309
0
14/08/2025
Query!
Approval date [1]
318309
0
08/09/2025
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
318309
0
2025-33625-70160-2
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive the same home strength program prescribed either i) once a week or ii) three times a week. Participants in both exercise groups will receive one videoconferencing consultation with a physiotherapist (within one week post-randomisation, 30 minutes). The physiotherapist will prescribe the same 5 standardised exercises to all participants at a standardised dosage of 3 sets of 12 repetitions per exercise. The physiotherapist will instruct the participants to perform their exercise program unsupervised at home, at their allocated weekly frequency, until the 3-month reassessment. The time point for re-assessment will be 3 months post-randomisation. The primary outcome measure will be the change in average walking pain over the past week on an NRS. Secondary outcome measures will include WOMAC pain and function; quality-of-life; arthritis and exercise self-efficacy; global rating of change; patient specific functional scale; patient acceptance of symptoms; sit to stand test; calf raise test; and willingness for joint replacement. We hypothesise that a strengthening exercise program prescribed once a week is non-inferior to the same home program prescribed three times a week in people with knee OA.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
143770
0
Dr Travis Haber
Query!
Address
143770
0
Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine Department of Physiotherapy Level 7, Alan Gilbert Building The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010 Australia
Query!
Country
143770
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
143770
0
+61 3 83440425
Query!
Fax
143770
0
Query!
Email
143770
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
143771
0
Ben Metcalf
Query!
Address
143771
0
Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine Department of Physiotherapy Level 7, Alan Gilbert Building The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010 Australia
Query!
Country
143771
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
143771
0
+61 3 83448127
Query!
Fax
143771
0
Query!
Email
143771
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
143772
0
Travis Haber
Query!
Address
143772
0
Centre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine Department of Physiotherapy Level 7, Alan Gilbert Building The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010 Australia
Query!
Country
143772
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
143772
0
+61 3 83440425
Query!
Fax
143772
0
Query!
Email
143772
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will the study consider sharing individual participant data?
Yes
Will there be any conditions when requesting access to individual participant data?
Persons/groups eligible to request access:
•
Data will be made available as required for specific, approved analyses by researchers. Data will be provided from locked, cleaned, and de- identified study database. Requests will be reviewed by the Principal Investigator prior to approval.
Conditions for requesting access:
•
-
What individual participant data might be shared?
•
All data presented in the published results paper, available in XLSX format.
What types of analyses could be done with individual participant data?
•
The investigators endorse the concept of data sharing to advance medical science. All requests for data sharing will be reviewed by the Principal Investigator to ensure no conflict with any planned sub analyses and to ensure that the data are shared in an ethical and protected manner.
Analyses aimed to improve treatment of knee osteoarthritis for non-commercial purposes are eligible.
When can requests for individual participant data be made (start and end dates)?
From:
After publication of main results
To:
A period of 15 years from publication
Where can requests to access individual participant data be made, or data be obtained directly?
•
By emailing the Principal Investigator at
[email protected]
. Data will be made available after review and approval by the Principal Investigator. Before any analysis, a signed Confidentiality Agreement and/or Data Sharing Agreement is required.
Are there extra considerations when requesting access to individual participant data?
No
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
Data dictionary
The Data Dictionary will be supplied with the de-i...
[
More Details
]
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF