Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
A database of clinical trials and their results from Australia, New Zealand, and other countries.
account_circle
Log in
to register or update your trial
search
Search for trials
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12625000978460
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
22/04/2025
Date registered
5/09/2025
Date last updated
5/09/2025
Date data sharing statement initially provided
5/09/2025
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
The SenseVest Trial: Investigating the effect of sensory vests on autistic children's mental health.
Query!
Scientific title
Effect, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of a sensory vest on autistic children's anxiety, sensory regulation, self-regulation, sleep and physical activity: a Phase 2 randomised placebo-controlled trial.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
314257
0
MRF2035705
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
SenseVest
Query!
Linked study record
ACTRN12622001244796 is the pilot study that preceded and informed the current trial.
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
anxiety
337179
0
Query!
autism
337180
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Mental Health
333595
333595
0
0
Query!
Autistic spectrum disorders
Query!
Mental Health
333596
333596
0
0
Query!
Anxiety
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
The sensory vest is clothing worn close to the body, generally as an undergarment. The best is made from stretchy, wicking fabric. The vest is sleeveless and covers the torso finishing at the upper hips. Participants will be asked to wear the vest daily for a minimum of 6 continuous hours. Participants will wear the vest for 3 months. Full adherence to this schedule will be defined as meeting 80% of this dosage regime. Participants can wear the vest for longer than 6 hours per day if desired. Participants are to carry out their daily activities as per usual while wearing the vest. No additional tasks or activities above and beyond the study visits and completion of surveys are required. Caregivers of participants are asked to report on hours that the vest was worn for the previous two days, every second day via a prompt notification to their smartphone.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
330869
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
The placebo sensory vest is manufactured from the same fabric and design template as the active sensory vest but is two sizes larger so does not offer any compressive effect.
Query!
Control group
Placebo
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
341174
0
Child anxiety
Query!
Assessment method [1]
341174
0
Parent report using Anxiety Scale for Children - Autism Spectrum Disorder
Query!
Timepoint [1]
341174
0
T0 (study entry) and T4 (study exit-end of 12 weeks of intervention) . T4 is considered the primary endpoint for the primary outcomes.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
342641
0
Child anxiety
Query!
Assessment method [2]
342641
0
Electrodermal activity during self-regulation challenge
Query!
Timepoint [2]
342641
0
T1 (baseline, pre-intervention) T2 (1 month following intervention commencement) T3 (2 months following intervention commencement) T4 (study exit-end of 12 weeks of intervention)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
446651
0
Sensory regulation
Query!
Assessment method [1]
446651
0
Parent report of clinical sensory differences using the Sensory Experiences Questionnaire (3.0)
Query!
Timepoint [1]
446651
0
Study baseline (T1 pre-intervention) Study exit (T4 - end of 12 weeks intervention).
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
446653
0
Sensory regulation - sensory tactile discomfort
Query!
Assessment method [2]
446653
0
Worst Itch Scale
Query!
Timepoint [2]
446653
0
Every second day via child/parent report on MyCap from intervention commencement until T4, end of 12 weeks intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
446656
0
Goal Attainment Scaling of self-regulation goals
Query!
Assessment method [3]
446656
0
Semi-structured one-on-one face-to-face interview with a member of the research team.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
446656
0
T1 (baseline, pre-intervention) T2 (1 month following intervention commencement) T3 (2 months following intervention commencement) T4 (study exit-end of 12 week)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
446657
0
Sleep quality
Query!
Assessment method [4]
446657
0
Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire
Query!
Timepoint [4]
446657
0
Study baseline (T1 -one month following intervention commencement ), study exit (T4 - end of 12 weeks intervention).
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
446658
0
Cost-effectiveness
Query!
Assessment method [5]
446658
0
Change in health and community service usage and caregiver productivity via NDIS plan usage and caregiver economic questionnaire
Query!
Timepoint [5]
446658
0
Study baseline (T1 - pre-intervention) Study exit (T4 - end of 12 week intervention)
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
446659
0
Acceptability- this will be assessed as a composite outcome.
Query!
Assessment method [6]
446659
0
1. Tolerance - daily vest wear. Collected from participant diary to continue use through study specific survey. 2. Intent to continue use of vest. Assessed via semi-structured one-on-one face-to-face interview with a member of the research team. 3. Perceived benefit of vest. Assessed via semi-structured one-on-one face-to-face interview with a member of the research team.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
446659
0
1. Every other day by parent report via MyCap across study baseline (T1 - pre-intervention) until study exit (T4 - end of 12 week intervention), 2. Study exit (T4 - end of 12 week intervention) 3. Study baseline (T1 - pre-intervention) and study exit (T4 - end of 12 week intervention)
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
451343
0
Observed behavioural self-regulation
Query!
Assessment method [7]
451343
0
Retrospective video coding of behavioural regulation during Lab-TAB administration
Query!
Timepoint [7]
451343
0
T1 (baseline, pre-intervention) T2 (1 month following intervention commencement) T3 (2 months following intervention commencement) T4 (study exit- end of 12 week intervention)
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
451344
0
Child mood
Query!
Assessment method [8]
451344
0
Parent rating of child mood on four mood domains (angry, irritable, calm, happy) each on a 5-point Likert scale.
Query!
Timepoint [8]
451344
0
Every other day via MyCap app from intervention commencement to T4 (study exit- end of 12 week intervention).
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
451371
0
Physical activity
Query!
Assessment method [9]
451371
0
REDCap form
Query!
Timepoint [9]
451371
0
Completed weekly during intervention until T4 (study exit-end of 12 weeks intervention).
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
451648
0
Sensory regulation
Query!
Assessment method [10]
451648
0
Vibrotactile perception measured by the Cortical Metrics Brain gauge
Query!
Timepoint [10]
451648
0
Study baseline (T1 - pre-intervention) Study exit (T4 - end of 12 week intervention).
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
451649
0
Sensory regulation
Query!
Assessment method [11]
451649
0
Proprioceptive functioning via Clinical Observations of Motor and Praxis Skills-2
Query!
Timepoint [11]
451649
0
Study baseline (T1 - pre-intervention) Study exit (T4 - end of 12 weeks intervention)
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
451650
0
Sleep quality
Query!
Assessment method [12]
451650
0
PROMIS Paediatric Fatigue Scale-Short Form
Query!
Timepoint [12]
451650
0
Weekly from intervention commencement to T4 (end of 12 weeks intervention).
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
451651
0
Sleep quality
Query!
Assessment method [13]
451651
0
Daily sleep quality, latency and nighttime wakening
Query!
Timepoint [13]
451651
0
Every other day by parent report via MyCap from intervention commencement to T4 (study exit-end of 12 weeks intervention).
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
451652
0
Cost-effectiveness
Query!
Assessment method [14]
451652
0
Children's Health Utility Index-9D
Query!
Timepoint [14]
451652
0
Study baseline (T1 - pre-intervention) study exit (T4 - end of 12 week intervention)
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
1. Child age between 8-12 years
2. Formal diagnosis by qualified practitioner (clinical psychologist, paediatrician or psychiatrist)
3. Can reliably indicate discomfort or pain to a familiar adult using verbal or non-verbal means as assessed by the Pragmatics Profile of Everyday Communication Skills.
4. Experience clinically significant sensory dysregulation (assessed via the Short Sensory Profile)
5. Experience clinically significant anxiety (assessed via Anxiety Scale for Children-Autism Spectrum Disorder
6. Able to attend study visits in either Melbourne or Perth
7. No prior use of sensory clothing
8. Have a legal guardian who can provide informed consent
Query!
Minimum age
8
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
12
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
1. Not autistic
2. Unable to provide informed consent (parent/guardian)
3. Unable to reliably indicate discomfort
4. No experience of clinically significant sensory dysregulation or anxiety
5. Unable to tolerate sensory or placebo vest
6. Unable to attend study visits in either Melbourne or Perth
7. Has previously used or currently using JettProof sensory clothing (or equivalent)
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Yes. The La Trobe University Clinical Trials Platform will independently conduct randomisation using an online randomisation sequence generator (Sealed Envelope) to generate the sequence. The sequence will then be securely uploaded to the project’s REDCap database. Only the trial coordinators at each site will have access to the randomisation page in REDCap.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Permuted blocks with 1:1 allocation, stratified for site (Vic, WA).
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
The people administering the treatment/s
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Target sample size: n=140
Sample size calculation - Our pilot data indicated a moderate to high effect for decrease in electrodermal activity during the intervention phase (Cohen’s d range: mean -0.55 to -0.64; median –0.62 to -0.65; p=0.03 for both). Our sample size of 70 per group, provides 80% power to detect a conservatively chosen effect size of 0.5, allowing for up to 10% drop-out.
Baseline characteristics will be reported as mean (sd) or median (IQR) for continuous measurements depending on skew. Discrete data with a small number of possible outcomes (e.g. gender) will be reported as percentages.
Continuous outcomes measured at T1, T2, T3, T4 will be modelled using linear mixed effect models (LMEs) with a random intercept to account for within-participant correlation. Treatment group, and timepoint will be included as factor variables to allow for nonlinear change over time, and an interaction term between group and time will be included to allow for different change trajectories. Analysis and visualisation of model residuals will be carried out. Transformations will be used to adjust for any detected heteroscedastic patterns with a back transformation used to report outcomes on the original scale (e.g. if a log transformation is used, results will be exponentiated back to the original scale and results will be presented as percentage change). If large outliers are detected and these are not rectified by transformations, robust LMEs will be used. If robust methods are used, any differences with the non-robust fitted models will be discussed.
Discrete (count) outcomes measure at T1, T2, T3 and T4 will be modelled using generalised LMEs, with a negative binomial model to allow for likely overdispersion. Treatment group and time will be included as factor variables (as above) and a random intercept included for participant. Model diagnostics will again be carried out via visualisation of deviance residuals.
Analysis of data collected at T1 and T4 will be carried out using ANCOVA (and generalised ANCOVA as appropriate for discrete data), with baseline (T1) and treatment groups as covariates, including interaction terms. Residuals diagnostics will again be used to detected model inadequacies, with transformations and/or robust estimators used accordingly.
All tests will be two-sided tests, and all results reports as estimates, 95% confidence intervals, and p-values. Results associated with p-values > 0.05 will not be reported as ‘no difference’, instead presented in terms of statistical significance and trends to towards such.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
15/09/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
30/09/2026
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
31/12/2026
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
140
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
WA,VIC
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
318781
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
318781
0
Department of Health and Aged Care-Medical Research Future Fund
Query!
Address [1]
318781
0
Query!
Country [1]
318781
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
La Trobe University
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
321221
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
321221
0
Query!
Address [1]
321221
0
Query!
Country [1]
321221
0
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
283489
0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name [1]
283489
0
Clinikids, The Kids Institute
Query!
Address [1]
283489
0
Query!
Country [1]
283489
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
317388
0
La Trobe University Human Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
317388
0
https://www.latrobe.edu.au/researchers/research-office/ethics/human-ethics
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
317388
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
317388
0
28/04/2025
Query!
Approval date [1]
317388
0
08/07/2025
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
317388
0
Query!
Ethics committee name [2]
317390
0
The University of Western Australia Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [2]
317390
0
http://www.research.uwa.edu.au/staff/human-research/welcome-to-HREO
Query!
Ethics committee country [2]
317390
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [2]
317390
0
26/05/2025
Query!
Approval date [2]
317390
0
11/07/2025
Query!
Ethics approval number [2]
317390
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The primary aim of this study is to assess the effect of a sensory vest on autistic children’s anxiety. Using a randomised controlled trial design, Autistic children aged 8-12 years will be randomly allocated to an experimental (sensory vest) or placebo vest condition. Study participants will wear the vests for 12 weeks, attend monthly study visits with the research team and complete brief online surveys throughout. Child anxiety will be measured by assessing stress response (electrodermal activity via sweat response) during activity and parent report. The secondary aim of the study is to explore the mechanism-of-action and cost-effectiveness of the sensory vest. Specifically, we will examine a) whether the sensory vest affects anxiety symptoms directly or indirectly via sensory regulation, sleep quality and/or physical activity pathways, and b) the cost-effectiveness of sensory vest wear compared to placebo in terms of health-related quality of life from a societal perspective.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
140898
0
Prof Alison Lane
Query!
Address
140898
0
Olga Tennison Autism Research Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne Vic 3086
Query!
Country
140898
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
140898
0
+61 3 9479 2463
Query!
Fax
140898
0
Query!
Email
140898
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
140899
0
Alison Lane
Query!
Address
140899
0
Olga Tennison Autism Research Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne Vic 3086
Query!
Country
140899
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
140899
0
+61 3 9479 2463
Query!
Fax
140899
0
Query!
Email
140899
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
140900
0
Alison Lane
Query!
Address
140900
0
Olga Tennison Autism Research Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne Vic 3086
Query!
Country
140900
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
140900
0
+61 3 9479 2463
Query!
Fax
140900
0
Query!
Email
140900
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will the study consider sharing individual participant data?
Yes
Will there be any conditions when requesting access to individual participant data?
Persons/groups eligible to request access:
•
Researchers
Conditions for requesting access:
•
No requirements
What individual participant data might be shared?
•
All de-identified individual participant data
What types of analyses could be done with individual participant data?
•
Studies exploring new research questions
•
Health economic analyses
•
Studies testing whether findings can be repeated or confirmed
When can requests for individual participant data be made (start and end dates)?
From:
At the end of the study
To:
Not yet decided
Where can requests to access individual participant data be made, or data be obtained directly?
•
Email of trial custodian, sponsor or committee:
[email protected]
Are there extra considerations when requesting access to individual participant data?
No
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF