Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
A database of clinical trials and their results from Australia, New Zealand, and other countries.
account_circle
Log in
to register or update your trial
search
Search for trials
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12625000693426p
Ethics application status
Submitted, not yet approved
Date submitted
12/06/2025
Date registered
1/07/2025
Date last updated
20/07/2025
Date data sharing statement initially provided
1/07/2025
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Pilot Virtual Reality Intervention for Older Adults Living in Aged Residential Care Facilities
Query!
Scientific title
Pilot Study Assessing whether an Immersive Nature Virtual Reality Experience Improves Psychological and Physical Well-Being for Older Adults Residing in Aged Residential Care Facilities.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
314469
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Existential distress
337505
0
Query!
Depression
337506
0
Query!
Anxiety
337778
0
Query!
Spiritual well-being
337779
0
Query!
Somatic symptoms
337780
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Mental Health
333872
333872
0
0
Query!
Other mental health disorders
Query!
Mental Health
334122
334122
0
0
Query!
Depression
Query!
Mental Health
334123
334123
0
0
Query!
Anxiety
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Participants will all experience the same 10-minute nature-based virtual reality session conducted in person at each individual’s rest home facility. They will be fitted with a Meta Quest 3 headset to wear for the 10-minute duration. The VR experience features footage of New Zealand nature scenes accompanied by meditative music blended with the natural sounds of each scene. This footage can be accessed on youtube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEO4my44oqw). Prior to the VR experience, participants will complete a 40-minute baseline questionnaire and via an iPad watch a 4-minute pre-recorded video introducing and encouraging the experience of awe. Immediately following the VR session, a follow-up questionnaire taking approximately 30 minutes will be completed. Finally, one week later, the final follow-up questionnaire will be completed, taking 35 minutes either in-person or online. The session will be conducted by the student researcher completing her thesis in Health Psychology. The VR experience will be conducted with participants either seated in a sturdy chair or in bed in a sitting-up position. The intervention will be delivered face to face to each participant individually. Adherence to the VR experience will be monitored by direct observation from the researcher.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
331092
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Intervention code [2]
331334
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
No control group.
Query!
Control group
Uncontrolled
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
341501
0
Acceptability of study procedures and virtual reality intervention. This will be assessed as a composite outcome.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
341501
0
Qualitative analysis using interview transcripts, which will be analyzed using content analysis and mapped to the constructs of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (e.g., burden, ethicality, intervention coherence, opportunity costs, perceived effectiveness, and self-efficacy).
Query!
Timepoint [1]
341501
0
Interviews will be completed at three time points, baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and one week post-intervention (T3). Analyses will occur at the completion of all interviews.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
342238
0
Feasibility of the study procedures and virtual reality intervention. This will be assessed as a composite outcome.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
342238
0
Feasibility will be measured through assessing recruitment, retention, intervention delivery, data completeness, and safety and adverse effects. Data will be collected from the researcher's field notes and participant feedback from open-ended questions. Pre-defined success thresholds include >70% retention, >70% recruitment, >80% VR dose completion, <20% cybersickness symptoms, and <10% distress prompting withdrawal or additional support.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
342238
0
Analysis will occur at completion of the project.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
447786
0
Changes in depression.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
447786
0
Self-reported using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D)
Query!
Timepoint [1]
447786
0
Baseline, immediately after the VR session, and 7 days post.
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
447787
0
Changes in spiritual well-being.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
447787
0
Self-reported using the FACIT-Sp12.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
447787
0
Baseline, immediately after the VR session, and 7 days post.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
448642
0
Change in somatic symptoms.
Query!
Assessment method [3]
448642
0
Self-reported using the Somatic Symptom Scale (SSS-8).
Query!
Timepoint [3]
448642
0
Baseline, and 7 days post the VR session.
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
449027
0
Changes in anxiety.
Query!
Assessment method [4]
449027
0
Self-reported using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A),
Query!
Timepoint [4]
449027
0
Baseline, immediately after the VR session, and 7 days post.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Key inclusion criteria are (a) participants are aged 65 years and older, and (b) participants are residing within a residential care facility (rest home setting).
Query!
Minimum age
65
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Key exclusion criteria are (a) participants have a cognitive, visual, or hearing impairment that would limit their ability to provide informed consent, answer questionnaires, and use virtual reality technology, (b) participants have a history of significant motion sickness, current nausea, or are physically unable to tolerate wearing the virtual reality headset for a minimum of a 10-minute duration, and (c) participants are unable to read or speak in English.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Allocation is not concealed.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people receiving the treatment/s
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Single group
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Safety/efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
A sample size of 25 participants is considered appropriate to assess feasibility and acceptability, and to provide a preliminary indication of intervention effects. This sample size should provide sufficient power to detect a medium effect size for changes between baseline (T1), immediately post-intervention (T2), and one-week follow-up (T3) using a factorial repeated measures within-subject ANOVA analysis.
Descriptive statistics will be used to assess feasibility outcomes, including recruitment, retention, intervention adherence, safety, and data completeness. SPSS software will be used for quantitative analyses. Changes in well-being outcomes (connectedness, spiritual well-being, depression, anxiety, and somatic symptom burden) across three time points (baseline, post-intervention, and one-week follow-up) will be analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA and paired t-tests, with appropriate corrections or non-parametric alternatives applied as needed. Qualitative interview data will be analyzed using directed content analysis based on the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) domains.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
1/08/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
31/10/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
31/10/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
25
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment outside Australia
Country [1]
27067
0
New Zealand
Query!
State/province [1]
27067
0
Waikato
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
319006
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
319006
0
University of Auckland
Query!
Address [1]
319006
0
Query!
Country [1]
319006
0
New Zealand
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
University of Auckland
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
New Zealand
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
321472
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
321472
0
Query!
Address [1]
321472
0
Query!
Country [1]
321472
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Submitted, not yet approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
317619
0
Auckland Health Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
317619
0
https://www.auckland.ac.nz/en/research/about-our-research/human-ethics.html
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
317619
0
New Zealand
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
317619
0
15/04/2025
Query!
Approval date [1]
317619
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
317619
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This study aims to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of a 10-minute virtual reality nature experience for older adults residing in aged residential care facilities. Specifically, the study aims to: 1.) Evaluate the feasibility of the study design and VR experience through examining recruitment, retention, intervention delivery, safety and adverse effects, and data completeness. 2.) Qualitatively evaluate the acceptability of the study design and VR experience. 3.) Conduct a preliminary examination of the impact of the VR experience on well-being outcomes, including connectedness to self, others, and the world, spiritual well-being, depression, anxiety, and somatic symptom burden. It is hypothesized that the virtual reality (VR) nature experience will be feasible and acceptable for use with older adults in aged care, and may lead to preliminary improvements in well-being outcomes.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
141586
0
Miss Sophie Mihaljevich
Query!
Address
141586
0
Department of Psychological Medicine Level 12, Room 12.101 Support Building Auckland City Hospital 2 Park Road Grafton Auckland 1023, New Zealand
Query!
Country
141586
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
141586
0
+64 0274420993
Query!
Fax
141586
0
Query!
Email
141586
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
141587
0
Sophie Mihaljevich
Query!
Address
141587
0
Department of Psychological Medicine Level 12, Room 12.101 Support Building Auckland City Hospital 2 Park Road Grafton Auckland 1023, New Zealand
Query!
Country
141587
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
141587
0
+64 0274420993
Query!
Fax
141587
0
Query!
Email
141587
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
141588
0
Sophie Mihaljevich
Query!
Address
141588
0
Department of Psychological Medicine Level 12, Room 12.101 Support Building Auckland City Hospital 2 Park Road Grafton Auckland 1023, New Zealand
Query!
Country
141588
0
New Zealand
Query!
Phone
141588
0
+64 0274420993
Query!
Fax
141588
0
Query!
Email
141588
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will the study consider sharing individual participant data?
Yes
Will there be any conditions when requesting access to individual participant data?
Persons/groups eligible to request access:
•
Researchers
Conditions for requesting access:
•
Yes, conditions apply:
•
Requires review on a case-by-case basis by the trial custodian, sponsor or data sharing committee
•
Requires a scientifically sound proposal or protocol
•
Requires approval by an ethics committee
•
Requires a data sharing agreement between data requester and trial custodian or sponsor
What individual participant data might be shared?
•
All de-identified individual participant data
What types of analyses could be done with individual participant data?
•
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
•
Studies testing whether findings can be repeated or confirmed
When can requests for individual participant data be made (start and end dates)?
From:
At the end of the study
To:
A finite period of:
6
years
Where can requests to access individual participant data be made, or data be obtained directly?
•
By contacting researcher Dr. Lisa Reynolds
[email protected]
Are there extra considerations when requesting access to individual participant data?
No
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
Informed consent form
Informed Consent Form AHREC.pdf
Study protocol
Study Protocol Pilot VR AHREC.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF