Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12625000546459p
Ethics application status
Submitted, not yet approved
Date submitted
4/05/2025
Date registered
29/05/2025
Date last updated
29/05/2025
Date data sharing statement initially provided
29/05/2025
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
PACEmaker AUGMENTed AF ablation in participants with atrial fibrillation (AF) and sinus node disease – the PACE AUGMENT-AF Study.
Query!
Scientific title
Effectiveness of PACEmaker AUGMENTed AF ablation for Improved Outcomes in participants with AF and sinus node disease – the PACE AUGMENT-AF Study.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
314349
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
atrial fibrillation
337331
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cardiovascular
333714
333714
0
0
Query!
Other cardiovascular diseases
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
This is a randomised control trial for older patients with both atrial fibrillation (AF) and sinus node dysfunction to expore whether pacemaker programming can decrease the risk of AF recurrence following catheter ablation. All patients will recieve catheter ablation for AF. Patients in the intervention arm will have their pacemaker programmed to a higher atrial pacing rate - termed "increased atrial pacing" (Dual-chamber rate-modulated (DDDR) at 70bpm for all patients in the intervention arm) which will be reprogrammed by the study investigators at the randomisation visit. Patients will be followed up at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post randomisation, where data from the pacemaker can be reviewed to check adherence to the intervention
Query!
Intervention code [1]
330962
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Intervention code [2]
331046
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
All patients with undergo catheter ablation for AF. The comparator arm will have their pacemaker programmed to a lower atrial pacing rate - termed "back-up atrial pacing" (lower rate of 30). Patients will be followed up at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post randomisation.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
341307
0
The primary endpoint will be AF burden at 12 months
Query!
Assessment method [1]
341307
0
Determined by continuous monitoring via pacemaker both arms
Query!
Timepoint [1]
341307
0
12 months post randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
447089
0
Atrial ectopic burden
Query!
Assessment method [1]
447089
0
Continuous monitoring via pacemaker
Query!
Timepoint [1]
447089
0
12 months post randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
447087
0
Time to first AF recurrence
Query!
Assessment method [2]
447087
0
Continuous monitoring via pacemaker
Query!
Timepoint [2]
447087
0
up to 12 months post randomisation, assessed every 3 months
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
447109
0
Change in echocardiographic characteristics from baseline
Query!
Assessment method [3]
447109
0
Transthoracic echocardiography
Query!
Timepoint [3]
447109
0
Baseline and 12 months post randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
448027
0
Quality of life
Query!
Assessment method [4]
448027
0
SF-36 questionnaire.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
448027
0
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months post randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
447088
0
Syncopal episodes
Query!
Assessment method [5]
447088
0
Medical record and clinic reviews
Query!
Timepoint [5]
447088
0
3, 6, 9, 12 months post randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
447110
0
Health carer utilisation
Query!
Assessment method [6]
447110
0
Medical record and clinic reviews
Query!
Timepoint [6]
447110
0
12 months post randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
448028
0
Cardiovascular mortality
Query!
Assessment method [7]
448028
0
Medical record and clinic reviews
Query!
Timepoint [7]
448028
0
12 months post randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
447090
0
Quality of life through Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-life (AFEQT)
Query!
Assessment method [8]
447090
0
Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-life - AFEQT questionnaire
Query!
Timepoint [8]
447090
0
Baseline, 6 month and 12 months post randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
447112
0
Mortality
Query!
Assessment method [9]
447112
0
Medical record and clinic reviews
Query!
Timepoint [9]
447112
0
12 months post randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
447108
0
Change in functional status from baseline
Query!
Assessment method [10]
447108
0
6 minute walk test
Query!
Timepoint [10]
447108
0
Baseline and 12 months post randomisation
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
447111
0
Procedure related complications
Query!
Assessment method [11]
447111
0
Medical record and clinic reviews
Query!
Timepoint [11]
447111
0
12 months post randomisation
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Age greater than or equal to 65
Persistent AF, undergoing AF catheter ablation
Ongoing documented sinus node disease at least 1 month following catheter ablation, defined as:
- Fatigue, presyncope, dyspnoea, reduced exercise tolerance, or other symptoms that can correlate with slower heart rate, and at least one of the following: Mean sinus rhythm heart rate 80% max predicted heart rate on exercise stress test OR Mean sinus rhythm heart rate <60bpm on Holter monitor
Medicare eligible, able to consent, and able to adhere to follow-up requirements
Query!
Minimum age
65
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Contraindication to catheter ablation or pacemaker implantation.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Allocation concealment: clinicians referring participants for inclusion in the trial will not be aware, when this decision was made, to which group the subject will be allocated. Allocation concealment will occur through central randomisation
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Patient meeting eligibility following baseline screening will undergo baseline assessments and will subsequently be computer randomised in a 1:1 fashion through simple randomisation using a randomisation table created by computer software.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Data will be analysed according to treatment allocation (increased atrial pacing or no increased atrial pacing) on an intention-to-treat basis. Normally distributed continuous data will be summarized as mean ± standard deviation and analysed by the Student’s t-test. Skewed continuous data will be presented as median with interquartile range and were analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables will be presented as frequency (%) and were analysed using the Chi-squared test. A two-sided P-value of <0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Time-to-event outcomes will be analysed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves in an intention-to-treat analysis, utilising the log-rank test with 1 degree of freedom. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for time to event outcomes will be estimated using univariate Cox’s proportional hazards modelling.
The power calculation is based on the DISCERN-AF study, which investigated atrial fibrillation burden after catheter ablation through continuous monitoring (n=50, mean atrial fibrillation burden post ablation 1.39%+/-0.83%). We expect a 30% further reduction in atrial fibrillation burden in the intervention arm, requiring a final sample size of 150 participants (75 participants per arm), for statistical power of 80% and alpha of 0.05, which includes accounting for a 10% dropout rate and 10% crossover rate.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
2/06/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
31/07/2026
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
31/07/2027
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
150
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
318868
0
Self funded/Unfunded
Query!
Name [1]
318868
0
Query!
Address [1]
318868
0
Query!
Country [1]
318868
0
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
Alfred Health
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
321327
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
321327
0
Query!
Address [1]
321327
0
Query!
Country [1]
321327
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Submitted, not yet approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
317482
0
Alfred Hospital Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
317482
0
https://www.alfredhealth.org.au/research/ethics-research-governance
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
317482
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
317482
0
19/12/2024
Query!
Approval date [1]
317482
0
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
317482
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
We propose a randomised control trial to explore whether pacemaker programming, specifically an increased atrial pacing rate, can improve atrial fibrillation (AF) outcomes for older patients with concurrent sinus node disease. Participants will be randomised to either an increased atrial pacing rate, or atrial back-up pacing. The primary outcome will be AF burden.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
141194
0
A/Prof Sandeep Prabhu
Query!
Address
141194
0
The Heart Centre at the Alfred, Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004
Query!
Country
141194
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
141194
0
+61 390763522
Query!
Fax
141194
0
Query!
Email
141194
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
141195
0
Dr Kenneth Cho
Query!
Address
141195
0
Department of Cardiology Alfred Hospital 55 Commercial Rd, Melbourne VIC 3004
Query!
Country
141195
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
141195
0
+61 390762000
Query!
Fax
141195
0
Query!
Email
141195
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
141196
0
Dr Kenneth Cho
Query!
Address
141196
0
Department of Cardiology Alfred Hospital 55 Commercial Rd, Melbourne VIC 3004
Query!
Country
141196
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
141196
0
+61 390762000
Query!
Fax
141196
0
Query!
Email
141196
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will the study consider sharing individual participant data?
No
No IPD sharing reason/comment:
Data collected will be deidentified for data analysis and aggregation purposes. This is to maintain the integrity of the data collected.
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF