Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12625000398404
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
10/02/2025
Date registered
2/05/2025
Date last updated
30/06/2025
Date data sharing statement initially provided
2/05/2025
Type of registration
Retrospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
"Comparing Blood Flow Restriction Devices: How They Measure Limb Pressure"
Query!
Scientific title
Comparison of different blood flow restriction devices in assessing the limb occlusion pressure in healthy active athletes
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
313619
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
blood flow restriction
336170
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Cardiovascular
332715
332715
0
0
Query!
Normal development and function of the cardiovascular system
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Our objective is to compare limb occlusion pressure (LoP) measurements obtained using different devices in recreationally active individuals. This study employs a crossover design, with 21 participants undergoing LoP assessments in both supine and standing positions using each of the following five devices:
ZIMMER Tourniquet System – a medical-grade pneumatic device commonly used in surgical and clinical settings for controlled occlusion.
SUJI BFR Cuff – a semi-automated blood flow restriction system that connects to a smartphone app for guided occlusion pressure application.
AIRBANDs – manually inflated cuffs with a handheld pump and integrated pressure gauge, typically used in fitness environments.
SMART Cuffs Pro – an automated BFR system that determines LoP via pulse detection technology.
Pulse oximeter paired with a standard blood pressure cuff – a traditional method used to estimate LoP based on the disappearance of pulse signal, serving as a reference technique.
Participant anthropometrics including height, weight, and leg dominance will be recorded prior to testing. All device applications will be performed by a certified exercise physiologist to ensure consistency and safety.
For each device, participants will undergo two trials: one trial to determine LoP in the supine position and one trial to determine LoP in the standing position. No exercise protocols will be performed during these trials; the trials will only involve inflation of the cuff to determine LoP. The time to determine LoP will vary between devices, typically ranging from 20 seconds to 2 minutes.
Devices will be applied in a randomized order, and two trials will be conducted per device on the dominant leg, with a 5-minute rest (washout) period between trials to allow for full vascular recovery and eliminate carryover effects. A brief familiarization session with each device will be provided before formal testing.
After each LoP trial, participants will rate their perceived discomfort using a standard 0–10 numerical scale.
All testing will be conducted in a single session lasting approximately 120 to 150 minutes per participant. This crossover protocol, incorporating randomization and washout periods, is designed to ensure the internal validity of comparisons across devices.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
330527
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Intervention code [2]
330929
0
Rehabilitation
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Pulse oximeter paired with a standard blood pressure cuff
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
340688
0
LoP measurement using all 5 equipment's supine– This is the pressure required to to occlude the blood supply in the lower limb.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
340688
0
Limb occlusion pressure (LoP) in the supine position will be assessed in millimetres of mercury (mmHg) using five different blood flow restriction (BFR) devices. For each device, LoP is defined as the minimum cuff pressure required to occlude arterial blood flow to the distal limb. In automated systems such as the ZIMMER Tourniquet System, SUJI BFR Cuff, and SMART Cuffs Pro, LoP will be automatically determined and displayed by the device using built-in sensors or pulse detection algorithms. For AIRBANDs, which are manually inflated, LoP will be identified by inflating the cuff while monitoring the absence of a distal pulse via palpation or pulse oximetry. Similarly, when using a pulse oximeter paired with a standard blood pressure cuff, LoP will be determined by the cuff pressure at which the pulse waveform on the oximeter signal disappears. Each device will be used to assess LoP twice per participant on the dominant leg, and the average value from the two trials will be used for analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
340688
0
Each equipment will be used to assess Limb Occlusion Pressure (LoP) twice in the supine position—at baseline and again 5 minutes later, prior to standing.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
341262
0
LoP measurement using all 5 equipment's standing– This is the pressure required to to occlude the blood supply in the lower limb.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
341262
0
Limb occlusion pressure (LoP) in the standing position will be assessed in millimetres of mercury (mmHg) using the same five BFR devices described above. The procedures for determining LoP with automated systems, manual systems (AIRBANDs), and standard blood pressure cuffs paired with a pulse oximeter will be identical to those used in the supine position. Each device will be used to assess LoP twice peLimb occlusion pressure (LoP) in the standing position will be assessed in millimetres of mercury (mmHg) using the same five BFR devices described above. The procedures for determining LoP with automated systems, manual systems (AIRBANDs), and standard blood pressure cuffs paired with a pulse oximeter will be identical to those used in the supine position. Each device will be used to assess LoP twice per participant on the dominant leg, and the average value from the two trials will be used for analysis.r participant on the dominant leg, and the average value from the two trials will be used for analysis.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
341262
0
Each equipment will also be used to assess LoP while the participant is standing at 11 minutes and 16 minutes post-commencement of occlusion.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
444799
0
Ratings of discomfort – Is a subjective method used to measure an individual's perception of how difficult they are perceiving during pressure inflation.
Query!
Assessment method [1]
444799
0
Rating of discomfort (scale 1-10)
Query!
Timepoint [1]
444799
0
After each equipment scale will be asked for participants to respond.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
aged 18-40 years,
recreationally active with an IPAQ score above 600 METs per week equivalent to 150-300 minutes of physical exercise involvement,
no known medical conditions, and
no injuries in the last six months
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
40
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
Yes
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Any known medical condition and any injuries in the last six months.
resting blood pressure greater than 150/100 mmHg
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Educational / counselling / training
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Completed
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
14/08/2024
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
30/08/2024
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
Query!
Actual
30/08/2024
Query!
Sample size
Target
21
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
21
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
VIC
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
318087
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
318087
0
Deakin University
Query!
Address [1]
318087
0
Query!
Country [1]
318087
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
Deakin University
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
320826
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
320826
0
Query!
Address [1]
320826
0
Query!
Country [1]
320826
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
316735
0
Deakin University Human Research Ethics Committee (DUHREC)
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
316735
0
https://www.deakin.edu.au/research/support-for-researchers/research-integrity?a=438168
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
316735
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
316735
0
10/05/2024
Query!
Approval date [1]
316735
0
25/06/2024
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
316735
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Blood flow restriction (BFR) training has become increasingly popular for improving muscle strength, size, and endurance using lighter loads. A key factor in the safe and effective use of BFR is accurately measuring limb occlusion pressure (LoP)—the pressure needed to restrict blood flow to the limb without causing harm. While many devices are available to assess LoP, few studies have compared their accuracy and consistency. This study aims to evaluate and compare the performance of five commonly used BFR devices in measuring LoP in recreationally active individuals. We hypothesize that some devices will be more accurate and reliable than others, helping users make safer, evidence-based choices in both clinical and fitness settings.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
138838
0
A/Prof Stuart Warmington
Query!
Address
138838
0
School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125
Query!
Country
138838
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
138838
0
+61 3 925 17013
Query!
Fax
138838
0
Query!
Email
138838
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
138839
0
Stuart Warmington
Query!
Address
138839
0
School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125
Query!
Country
138839
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
138839
0
+61 3 925 17013
Query!
Fax
138839
0
Query!
Email
138839
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
138840
0
Stuart Warmington
Query!
Address
138840
0
School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125
Query!
Country
138840
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
138840
0
+61 3 925 17013
Query!
Fax
138840
0
Query!
Email
138840
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will the study consider sharing individual participant data?
No
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
Ethical approval
HEAG-H 105_2024-240625-Approval memo.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF