Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12625000378426
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
28/03/2025
Date registered
29/04/2025
Date last updated
29/04/2025
Date data sharing statement initially provided
29/04/2025
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Robotic Arm Intervention for Stroke rEcovery (RAISE): A pilot randomised controlled trial
Query!
Scientific title
Robotic Arm Intervention for Stroke rEcovery (RAISE): A pilot randomised controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of a novel exoskeleton device for improving upper limb impairment post stroke
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
312047
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
RAISE
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Stroke
333693
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Stroke
330373
330373
0
0
Query!
Haemorrhagic
Query!
Stroke
330372
330372
0
0
Query!
Ischaemic
Query!
Physical Medicine / Rehabilitation
333586
333586
0
0
Query!
Other physical medicine / rehabilitation
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Participants in the intervention group will receive a minimum of 40 hours additional therapy delivered five days per week (Mon-Fri) over four weeks, equating to approximately two hours per day. This therapy will be comprised of task specific motor training (75mins) and robotic therapy (45mins) delivered by a trained occupational therapist or physiotherapist. Task specific motor training will be delivered using a specifically developed manual, tailored to the individual's abilities. Activities will include tasks such as reaching for a cup to practice shoulder forward flexion and external rotation or attaching pegs to a line to practice train finger dexterity. Each activity within the manual has pre-planned levels of difficulty and modifications that may be enacted in order to individualise the activity to the participants ability.
Robotic therapy will be delivered using a portable robotic exoskeleton with real time visual biofeedback and electromyography (EMG) activation (see doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00867-7). The device is comprised of a forearm and hand support and simple visual display. Participants will be asked to attempt to extend their wrist and fingers. The EMG sensor will register muscle activity as the person attempts the movement, activating the device and moving the hand into wrist and finger extension.
Intervention will primarily be delivered within a clinical setting, with the option for intervention delivery in the participant's home or via telehealth as required at the discretion of the site investigator. In clinical settings, therapy may be delivered using a combination of individual and semi-supervised sessions (with up to three participants: 1 therapist).
Program adherence data will be collected by recording the duration of sessions (time spent active vs inactive), level of difficulty of therapy tasks (as reported by participants) and amount of repetitions completed.
Acceptability of the high dose motor retraining program will be measured via i) the theoretical framework of acceptability (TFA) questionnaire, which consists of seven component constructs of acceptability of an intervention and an overall acceptability measure and ii) The 10 question System Usability Scale (SUS), a validated tool, which measures a users’ experience of technology. This data will be collected by members of the research team.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
328513
0
Rehabilitation
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
The control group will receive usual care. This may include no ongoing allied health intervention inclusive of routinely delivered upper limb rehabilitation, delivered by an occupational therapist or physiotherapist. Mode and frequency of upper limb therapy within usual care will be dependent on usual procedures at that site.
The research team will collect data on duration, type of therapy and amount of repetitions completed during therapy sessions over the intervention period for both groups.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
338142
0
Change in upper limb motor impairment
Query!
Assessment method [1]
338142
0
Fugl Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment
Query!
Timepoint [1]
338142
0
Baseline (week 0), post-completion of intervention (week 5), follow up (week 17)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
434675
0
Grip Strength
Query!
Assessment method [1]
434675
0
Dynamometer
Query!
Timepoint [1]
434675
0
Baseline (week 0), post intervention (week 5), follow up (week 17)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
434681
0
Afferent fibre density
Query!
Assessment method [2]
434681
0
tractography via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Query!
Timepoint [2]
434681
0
Baseline (week 0), post-completion of intervention (week 5)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
434674
0
Change in upper limb dexterity
Query!
Assessment method [3]
434674
0
Box and Blocks Test
Query!
Timepoint [3]
434674
0
Baseline (week 0), post-completion of intervention (week 5), follow up (week 17)
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
434678
0
Quality of life
Query!
Assessment method [4]
434678
0
EQ-5D-5L
Query!
Timepoint [4]
434678
0
Baseline (week 0), post-completion of intervention (week 5), follow up (week 17)
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
434682
0
Acceptability of device
Query!
Assessment method [5]
434682
0
Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA)
Query!
Timepoint [5]
434682
0
Post-completion of intervention (week 5)
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
434679
0
Motor evoked potential
Query!
Assessment method [6]
434679
0
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
Query!
Timepoint [6]
434679
0
Baseline (week 0), post-completion of intervention (week 5)
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
434676
0
Spasticity
Query!
Assessment method [7]
434676
0
Modified Tardieu Scale
Query!
Timepoint [7]
434676
0
Baseline (week 0), post-completion of intervention (week 5), follow up (week 17)
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
446588
0
Usability of device
Query!
Assessment method [8]
446588
0
System Usability Scale (SUS)
Query!
Timepoint [8]
446588
0
Post-completion of intervention (week 5)
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
434677
0
Function in activities of daily living
Query!
Assessment method [9]
434677
0
Modified barthel index
Query!
Timepoint [9]
434677
0
Baseline (week 0), post- completion of intervention (week 5), follow up (week 17)
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
434680
0
Resting motor threshold
Query!
Assessment method [10]
434680
0
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
Query!
Timepoint [10]
434680
0
Baseline (week 0), post-completion of intervention (week 5)
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
First diagnosis of stroke, confirmed by neuroimaging
Aged 18 years or over
Eligible for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
Moderate to severe upper limb impairment as indicated by a Shoulder Abduction Finger Extension (SAFE) score of 2-7
Pre-morbid modified Rankin score of 3 or less
> 7 days and < 3 months post stroke onset
Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ) of > 5
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
People with contraindicators to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
People with absolute contraindicators to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)
Diagnosis of cerebellar stroke
Pre-morbid modified Rankin score of 4 or greater
Extremely severe upper limb impairment (SAFE score >7)
Mild upper limb impairment (SAFE score <2)
Short portable mental status questionnaire (SPMSQ) score of higher than 5
Unable to give informed consent
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Participants will be randomised following baseline assessment using an automated randomisation table in REDCap. The randomisation schedule will be developed and uploaded into REDCap by a biostatistician otherwise independent of the study team.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Participants will be stratified into two groups based in their Fugl-Meyer score - severe upper limb weakness group and mild to moderate upper limb weakness group
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people assessing the outcomes
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
This is a pilot study and therefore no calculations were carried out to inform sample size.
Primary analysis will be conducted using a linear regression model with mean change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment score between baseline and post intervention as the dependent variable, study arm as the independent variable and baseline Fugl-Meyer values and time post stroke as covariates also used for co-variate adaptive minimisation.
Respective effects of all numerical secondary outcomes will be estimated using a mixed effect linear regression. This will also be used to investigate neural markers between the study arms, and changes over time on imaging.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
5/05/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
30/06/2026
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
28/10/2026
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
30
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
NSW
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
26513
0
Liverpool Hospital - Liverpool
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
26512
0
St Vincent's Hospital (Darlinghurst) - Darlinghurst
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
42551
0
2010 - Darlinghurst
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
42552
0
2170 - Liverpool
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
316434
0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name [1]
316434
0
St Vincent's Curran Foundation
Query!
Address [1]
316434
0
Query!
Country [1]
316434
0
Australia
Query!
Funding source category [2]
316407
0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name [2]
316407
0
St Vincent's Clinic Foundation
Query!
Address [2]
316407
0
Query!
Country [2]
316407
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
St Vincent's Health Network Sydney Limited
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
318578
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
318578
0
Query!
Address [1]
318578
0
Query!
Country [1]
318578
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
315204
0
St Vincent’s Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
315204
0
https://svhs.org.au/home/research-education/research-office
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
315204
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
315204
0
22/04/2024
Query!
Approval date [1]
315204
0
26/11/2024
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
315204
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
This pilot feasibility study will assess delivery of high dose motor retraining through the use of a novel exoskeleton device. The use of robotic technologies can improve upper limb outcomes post stroke, providing stroke survivors with repetitive and task-specific motor retraining. Additionally, robotic technologies can provide opportunities for active practice for stroke survivors with severe upper limb weakness and provide immediate feedback to stroke survivors and clinicians on motor performance, supporting engagement in therapy and providing opportunities to personalise intervention. This study will also provide information on the feasibility and acceptability of the use of this particular technology, which will be used to inform a larger, fully powered clinical trial.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
133970
0
Dr Lauren Christie
Query!
Address
133970
0
Level 4 Aikenhead building, St Vincent’s Hospital Sydney, 390 Victoria St Darlinghurst NSW 2010
Query!
Country
133970
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
133970
0
+61 436853797
Query!
Fax
133970
0
Query!
Email
133970
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
133971
0
Lauren Christie
Query!
Address
133971
0
Level 4 Aikenhead building, St Vincent’s Hospital Sydney, 390 Victoria St Darlinghurst NSW 2010
Query!
Country
133971
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
133971
0
+61 436853797
Query!
Fax
133971
0
Query!
Email
133971
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
133972
0
Lauren Christie
Query!
Address
133972
0
Level 4 Aikenhead building, St Vincent’s Hospital Sydney, 390 Victoria St Darlinghurst NSW 2010
Query!
Country
133972
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
133972
0
+61 436853797
Query!
Fax
133972
0
Query!
Email
133972
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will the study consider sharing individual participant data?
No
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF