Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
A database of clinical trials and their results from Australia, New Zealand, and other countries.
account_circle
Log in
to register or update your trial
search
Search for trials
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12625000231448
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
30/05/2024
Date registered
31/03/2025
Date last updated
17/08/2025
Date data sharing statement initially provided
31/03/2025
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Assessing the impact of long-term continuous brainwave monitoring in people with epilepsy
Query!
Scientific title
Subscalp Electroencephalography (EEG) Augmentation For Accuracy and Reliability in Epilepsy Reviews (SEAFARER): a clinical trial in Adults With Epilepsy
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
310853
0
Alfred Health (sponsor) protocol number: SEA001
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
SEAFARER
Query!
Linked study record
This study is a follow-up study to the study with registration record ACTRN12619001587190.
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Epilepsy
331887
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Neurological
328617
328617
0
0
Query!
Epilepsy
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
The Minder (TM) subscalp EEG device is an Australian-made and designed device for recording ultra-long-term electroencephalography (EEG) data. This EEG data is useful in monitoring for seizures and other disease activity in epilepsy. It has been created with cloud-based device management and data storage tools, together with the device described as the Epiminder system. The Epiminder system involves telemetry of subscalp EEG data to a companion app on a secure smartphone, which continuously streams the data to a secure cloud-based server maintained by the manufacturer (Epi-Minder Pty Ltd).
This project will evaluate the utility of the Minder subscalp EEG device/system as an adjunct to routine face-to-face clinical care in people with epilepsy (‘augmented care’). There will be two groups of participants: (1) people with a Minder device in situ from a previous trial (ACTRN12619001587190), and (2) people without a device who will receive the new device as part of this trial. These participant groups will be pooled and enrolled in a pre-/post- intervention trial (quasi-experimental design). All participants will receive the augmented care intervention, which consists of providing the Minder subscalp EEG data to the treating clinician (which can also be shared with participants).
After enrolment, there will be a baseline period of 3 months to allow for:
- baseline data collection (all participants)
- implantation of Minder devices (new implant group only)
- Minder device checks (all participants) to ensure correct device function
Implantation of the device is performed under general anaesthesia by a neurosurgeon. It involves the placement of the electrode array lead and telemetry unit under the scalp, and takes approximately one hour. At the first postoperative visit (new implants) or screening visit (existing implants) participants will be instructed on the use of the device, including charging, care, and maintenance. At the same visit, Minder device checks will be carried out, including: impedance checks, signal quality, and general device function.
After the baseline period, monthly reports will then be generated based on the Minder device data for 6 months. The intervention period will consist of (1) access to the monthly reports, (2) access to the cloud-based Minder EEG data. The treating neurologist will be administering the intervention. The monthly reports from the Minder device will be sent to the treating neurologist, who can choose to act on and share the information with participants as they see fit. These reports will include a summary of epileptic EEG activity recorded by the Minder device, as well as adherence data, reflecting the percentage daily use of the system.
Study visits will be conducted 3-monthly. The frequency of clinical visits is determined by the treating neurologist. They may choose to arrange visits monthly with study reports, 3-monthly with study visits, or otherwise. The duration of appointments is at the discretion of the treating neurologist and their specific institutional policy, but is anticipated to reflect standard clinical appointment times (e.g. 15-30 minutes for reviews).
The primary outcome will be accuracy of participant recorded seizure diaries, compared with the Minder EEG recordings. Secondary outcomes include: changes to clinical practice (see below); and changes to: mood, quality of life, disability, seizure frequency, seizure severity, and side effects. A health economic impact analysis will also be conducted, as well as an implementation evaluation (see below).
Changes to practice as part of augmented care will be recorded, and include:
- Change to assessment of seizure frequency or seizure-freedom status
- Change to epilepsy diagnosis or classification
- Change to anti-seizure medication prescription
- Change to neuromodulation treatment
- Change in visit timing and frequency
- Change in driving eligibility
- Change in eligibility for advanced treatments
The trial will conclude after the 6-month intervention period (9 months). An implementation evaluation will be conducted at study exit, to assess acceptability of the augmented care intervention, and changes to the way people see themselves when using the Minder device. This will consist of semi-structured interviews and surveys of participants, and surveys of neurologists and neurosurgeons experience with the Minder system.
After the conclusion of the study, there will be an optional extension phase of up to 3 years during which Minder device data and safety data will continue to be acquired and recorded. During this period the treating clinicians for all participants may continue to access the Minder data.
This study is a follow-up study to a previous safety and feasibility study (ACTRN12619001587190).
Query!
Intervention code [1]
327268
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
No formal control group. The comparator will be the 3-month baseline period during which the intervention data is not provided to clinicians or participants.
Query!
Control group
Uncontrolled
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
336420
0
Accuracy of Minder subscalp EEG system in recording seizures in comparison with traditional seizure diaries
Query!
Assessment method [1]
336420
0
Sensitivity (recall) and precision of seizure diary recorded seizure versus gold standard Minder subscalp EEG
Query!
Timepoint [1]
336420
0
The primary timepoints are as follows, relative to enrolment: - 3 months (end of baseline/beginning of intervention) - 6 months - 9 months (end of study/beginning of option al long-term follow-up)
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
428300
0
Any change to accuracy of participant self-reporting of seizures over time
Query!
Assessment method [1]
428300
0
The accuracy of participant-completed seizure diaries relative to subscalp EEG recorded seizures, as measured by sensitivity (recall) and precision of seizure diary recorded seizure versus gold standard Minder subscalp EEG
Query!
Timepoint [1]
428300
0
After enrolment, the relevant timepoints are as follows, relative to enrolment: - 3 months (end of baseline/beginning of intervention) - 6 months - 9 months (end of study/beginning of option al long-term follow-up)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
428301
0
Any change in clinical practice
Query!
Assessment method [2]
428301
0
Measured on case report forms as a change in any of the following: anti-seizure medication prescription, follow-up visit frequency/timing, eligibility for advanced epilepsy treatment, or driving eligibility. These will be assessed together as a composite secondary outcome.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
428301
0
Assessed at each clinical visit. The frequency and duration of which is at the discretion of the treating neurologist, but is expected to be monthly to 3-monthly after enrolment, and 15-30 minutes respectively.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
428302
0
A change in seizure frequency
Query!
Assessment method [3]
428302
0
Seizure frequency: Minder subscalp EEG data and seizure diary seizure frequency
Query!
Timepoint [3]
428302
0
Seizure frequency: continuously collected; reviewed at study visits (3, 6, and 9 months post-enrolment).
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
428303
0
Patient experience and acceptability
Query!
Assessment method [4]
428303
0
Evaluated by: (1) Two survey instruments; the embodied sense of self scale (ESSS) and the sense of self scale (SOSS). (2) Semi-structured qualitative interviews conducted one-on-one (over telehealth) with a member (or members) of the research team.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
428303
0
At study exit (9 months post-enrolment)
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
428304
0
A change in quality of life (main secondary outcome)
Query!
Assessment method [5]
428304
0
Measured by the epilepsy-specific quality of life instrument: Quality of Life in Epilepsy 31 (QOLIE-31)
Query!
Timepoint [5]
428304
0
At study entry (enrolment), after baseline period (3 months), 6 months, and 9 months post-enrolment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
428305
0
Cost-effectiveness of the intervention as measured by incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) Both direct healthcare costs and indirect costs in terms of productivity losses from participants and caregivers will be collected in questionnaires at baseline and each follow-up visit. Healthcare utilisation related to the device implantation will be excluded from this analysis, and a sensitivity analysis will be conducted by including these costs.
Query!
Assessment method [6]
428305
0
The main outcome from the health economic evaluation will be the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) measured in terms of the difference in costs before and after the intervention divided by the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. The variables used for the QALY calculations include: - Review of healthcare utilisation diaries completed by participants - Completion of the following questionnaires: Work productivity activity index (WPAI), Out of pocket costs (OOPC), informal care needs - Euroqol-5 (EQ5D5L) health-related generic quality of life instrument
Query!
Timepoint [6]
428305
0
At study entry (enrolment), after baseline period (3 months), 6 months, and 9 months post-enrolment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
437097
0
A change in seizure severity
Query!
Assessment method [7]
437097
0
Seizure severity: Liverpool seizure severity scale (LSSS-2)
Query!
Timepoint [7]
437097
0
At study entry (enrolment), after baseline period (3 months), 6 months, and 9 months post-enrolment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
437104
0
Clinician acceptability
Query!
Assessment method [8]
437104
0
Surveys based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model (administered to treating neurologists and implanting neurosurgeons)
Query!
Timepoint [8]
437104
0
At study exit (9 months post-enrolment)
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
437215
0
Health related quality of life (exploratory secondary outcome)
Query!
Assessment method [9]
437215
0
Scores on EuroQol-5 (EQ5D5L) generic quality of life instrument
Query!
Timepoint [9]
437215
0
At study entry (enrolment), after baseline period (3 months), 6 months, and 9 months post-enrolment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
437216
0
Change in depressive symptoms (main secondary outcome)
Query!
Assessment method [10]
437216
0
Measured by the epilepsy-specific instrument: Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E) mean depression score
Query!
Timepoint [10]
437216
0
At study entry (enrolment), after baseline period (3 months), 6 months, and 9 months post-enrolment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
437217
0
Change in depressive symptoms (exploratory secondary outcome)
Query!
Assessment method [11]
437217
0
Measured by the generic instrument: Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) mean depression score
Query!
Timepoint [11]
437217
0
At study entry (enrolment), after baseline period (3 months), 6 months, and 9 months post-enrolment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
437218
0
Change in anxiety symptoms (main secondary outcome)
Query!
Assessment method [12]
437218
0
Measured by the epilepsy-specific instrument: Brief Epilepsy Anxiety Survey Instrument (BrEASI) mean anxiety score
Query!
Timepoint [12]
437218
0
At study entry (enrolment), after baseline period (3 months), 6 months, and 9 months post-enrolment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [13]
437219
0
Change in anxiety symptoms (exploratory secondary outcome)
Query!
Assessment method [13]
437219
0
Measured by the generic instrument: Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) mean anxiety score
Query!
Timepoint [13]
437219
0
At study entry (enrolment), after baseline period (3 months), 6 months, and 9 months post-enrolment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [14]
437220
0
Change in adverse effects (main secondary outcome)
Query!
Assessment method [14]
437220
0
Measured by the Liverpool Adverse Events Profile (LAEP) instrument
Query!
Timepoint [14]
437220
0
At study entry (enrolment), after baseline period (3 months), 6 months, and 9 months post-enrolment.
Query!
Secondary outcome [15]
437221
0
Disability: SERIAS (Seizure Related Impairment Assessment Scale)
Query!
Assessment method [15]
437221
0
Disability: SERIAS (Seizure Related Impairment Assessment Scale)
Query!
Timepoint [15]
437221
0
At study entry (enrolment), after baseline period (3 months), 6 months, and 9 months post-enrolment.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
New implant group:
- Adults age 18-75 years old
- Established clinical diagnosis of focal, generalized, or mixed focal & generalized epilepsy; as defined by (ILAE International League Against Epilepsy) criteria
- Previous scalp EEG recordings demonstrating typical ictal (seizure) activity within 5 years
- Seizure frequency is uncertain, and this uncertainty is clinically significant
- An estimated seizure frequency of at least one every 3 months. This may be a seizure frequency estimated/suspected by managing clinician, an event frequency reported by the patient/carer, or event frequency suggested by objective diagnostic testing.
- Prior neuroimaging within the last 5 years where applicable
- Except for epilepsy, must be medically and neurologically stable, as judged by clinician
- Participant anatomy must permit implantation of a subscalp EEG device
- Participant/caregiver must be able to speak and read English
- Participant/caregiver can be reasonably expected to maintain a seizure diary alone or with the assistant of a competent individual
- Participant, with the assistance of caregiver where necessary, is able to complete regular study visits and telephone or telehealth appointments in accordance with the study protocol
Additional requirements for participants who were assigned female sex at birth:
- Have a negative pregnancy test within 2 weeks prior to implant
- If sexually active, must be using a reliable form of contraception, surgically sterile, or be at least 2 years post-menopause
Existing implants group:
- Any participants from the previous Minder safety study who:
o Have completed 6 months of follow-up
o Still have a Minder device (ie, did not have it removed)
o Have demonstrated adequate device compliance (as judged by the site lead) including an average of at least 20% device usage during the original safety study.
o Have seizures reliably detected/recorded on the Minder subscalp EEG device
o Have a seizure frequency that is uncertain, and this uncertainty is clinically significant
o Have an estimated seizure frequency of at least one every 3 months. This may be a seizure frequency estimated/suspected by managing clinician, an event frequency reported by the patient/carer, or event frequency suggested by objective diagnostic testing.
This study is a follow-up study to an original safety and feasibility trial (ACTRN12619001587190)
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
75
Years
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
New implant group:
- Participants with progressive neurological disorders, unstable medical conditions, or terminal medical conditions
- Other implantable neurostimulation devices that preclude safe placement and normal operation of subscalp EEG device (e.g. deep brain stimulation – DBS – systems, Cochlear implants, etc), as judged by a neurosurgeon (NB: VNS, vagus nerve stimulation, is not an exclusion criteria)
- Epilepsy surgery within 6 months prior to planned implant date
- Severe or unstable psychiatric condition, that in the judgement of the participant’s treating neurologist/epileptologist, psychiatrist, or an investigator would preclude the ability to participate in the trial or where participation would represent a risk for the participant
- Moderate to severe cognitive or intellectual impairment, that in the judgement of the participant’s treating neurologist/epileptologist, psychologist, psychiatrist, or an investigator would preclude the ability to participate in the trial
- Active suicidal plan/intent in the past 6 months, history of suicide attempt within 2 years, or more than one lifetime suicide attempt
- Implantable cardiac pacemakers/defibrillator
- Ineligible or unsafe for surgery, as judged by neurosurgeon, due to any of the following:
o Bleeding diathesis due to oral antiplatelets, oral anticoagulants, platelet dysfunction, or other coagulopathy; unless otherwise agreed by a hematologist, neurosurgeon, and investigator
o Ineligible for cranial surgery
o Ineligible for or unable to tolerate a general anesthetic
o Unacceptably increased infection risk, for example due to inherited, acquired, or treatment related immunosuppression; unless otherwise agreed by an investigator and neurosurgeon.
o Major abnormality on clinical or laboratory testing that may preclude study participation
- Subjects unable to consent for themselves
- Recent scalp infection of skin breakdown within 6 weeks prior to implant
- Subjects likely to require, or have high likelihood of having, the following during the study period: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), lithotripsy or diathermy.
- Elective international travel planned during the 9-month study period (emergency travel is acceptable).
- Participants may be excluded by the study doctors based on their judgement, and this may include anticipation that participants may be unable to follow study protocols or participate for any reason, or concern about elevated safety risk for participants
Existing implants group:
- Inadequate compliance, as judged by the site lead or investigator
- Typical epileptic seizures not recordable / not captured on subscalp EEG device
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Non-randomised trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Other
Query!
Other design features
This will be a quasi-experimental (pre-post) study with two groups:
- the first group will consist of device-naive participants who will receive a subscalp EEG device implant as part of the intervention
- the second group will consist of participants from a previous safety/feasibility trial (ACTRN12619001587190) who already have a device implanted
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Sample size & statistical methods
For the primary outcome, accuracy of seizure diaries, sensitivity/recall will be calculated using events marked as seizures in participant seizure diaries, versus events marked as seizures using the subscalp EEG data.
An estimated 15 new implants and 15 existing implants will be recruited, for a total of 30 participants that will contribute data for analysis. It is conservatively assumed that an average of 2 seizures will occur in each of the 30 participants over the 6-month intervention period. Considering subscalp EEG as the 'gold standard' with 100% accuracy in detecting seizures, and conservatively assuming a moderate intra-cluster correlation of 0.25, the sample size of 30 will have at least 80% power to detect if the sensitivity/recall of seizure diaries is less than or equal to 86% in a one-sample proportions test clustered by participants.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
14/04/2025
Query!
Actual
18/06/2025
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
14/10/2026
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
14/07/2027
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
30
Query!
Accrual to date
2
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
QLD,VIC
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
26616
0
The Alfred - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment hospital [2]
26617
0
Royal Melbourne Hospital - City campus - Parkville
Query!
Recruitment hospital [3]
26618
0
Austin Health - Austin Hospital - Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment hospital [4]
26619
0
St Vincent's Hospital (Melbourne) Ltd - Fitzroy
Query!
Recruitment hospital [5]
26620
0
Mater Hospital Brisbane - South Brisbane
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
42656
0
3004 - Melbourne
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [2]
42657
0
3050 - Parkville
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [3]
42658
0
3084 - Heidelberg
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [4]
42659
0
3065 - Fitzroy
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [5]
42660
0
4101 - South Brisbane
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
315108
0
Government body
Query!
Name [1]
315108
0
NHMRC (National Helath and Medical Research Council) Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF)
Query!
Address [1]
315108
0
GPO Box 1421 Canberra ACT 2601
Query!
Country [1]
315108
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Hospital
Query!
Name
Alfred Health
Query!
Address
Monash University, Victoria 3800 Australia
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
317126
0
Commercial sector/Industry
Query!
Name [1]
317126
0
Epi-Minder Pty Ltd
Query!
Address [1]
317126
0
384-388 Albert St, East Melbourne VIC 3002
Query!
Country [1]
317126
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
314046
0
Alfred Hospital HREC
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
314046
0
55 Commercial Rd, Melbourne VIC 3004, Australia
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
314046
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
314046
0
15/11/2023
Query!
Approval date [1]
314046
0
03/09/2024
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
314046
0
Query!
Ethics committee name [2]
318282
0
Alfred Hospital Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [2]
318282
0
https://www.alfredhealth.org.au/research/ethics-research-governance
Query!
Ethics committee country [2]
318282
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [2]
318282
0
20/09/2024
Query!
Approval date [2]
318282
0
25/11/2024
Query!
Ethics approval number [2]
318282
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
People with epilepsy suffer not only from the effects of their chronic and disabling condition but also the uncertainty surrounding when and how it will affect them. New Australian technology that is currently under investigation - the Epiminder system - is designed to allow for continuous recording of brainwave activity (electroencephalography, or EEG) for months to years, using an implant under the scalp. This technology has the potential to offer unprecedented insights and certainty for patients and the clinicians who care for them. This project will evaluate this new 'subscalp' monitoring technology, to see how it can improve the lives of people with epilepsy. Specifically, we hypothesise (believe) that this new long-term subscalp brainwave monitoring will be more accurate than traditional methods of (people recording seizures in diaries), and that this increased accuracy will lead to better outcomes for people with epilepsy. NB: The Epiminder system is for investigational use only and it’s not approved in any geography.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
130230
0
Dr Hugh Simpson
Query!
Address
130230
0
Alfred Centre, L6, 99 Commercial Rd, Melbourne VIC 3004
Query!
Country
130230
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
130230
0
+61 3 9903 94001
Query!
Fax
130230
0
Query!
Email
130230
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
130231
0
Hugh Simpson
Query!
Address
130231
0
Alfred Centre, L6, 99 Commercial Rd, Melbourne VIC 3004
Query!
Country
130231
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
130231
0
+61 3 9903 94001
Query!
Fax
130231
0
Query!
Email
130231
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
130232
0
Hugh Simpson
Query!
Address
130232
0
Alfred Centre, L6, 99 Commercial Rd, Melbourne VIC 3004
Query!
Country
130232
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
130232
0
+61 3 9903 94001
Query!
Fax
130232
0
Query!
Email
130232
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will the study consider sharing individual participant data?
No
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF