Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12625000185460
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
20/12/2024
Date registered
17/02/2025
Date last updated
29/06/2025
Date data sharing statement initially provided
17/02/2025
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
CASCADE-OA (Community bAsed phySical aCtivity AnD sElf management for OsteoArthritis)
Query!
Scientific title
CASCADE-OA: A randomised-controlled trial of the effect of community-based physical activity and self-management on physical activity levels in people with osteoarthritis
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
312013
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
CASCADE-OA
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Osteoarthritis
333623
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Physical Medicine / Rehabilitation
333074
333074
0
0
Query!
Other physical medicine / rehabilitation
Query!
Musculoskeletal
330310
330310
0
0
Query!
Osteoarthritis
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
The intervention will be the self-directed 12-week Walk with Ease Australia program. The Walk with Ease Australia program has been adapted from a 6-week self-directed walking program which was developed by the Thurston Arthritis Research Centre and the Institute on Aging of the University of North Carolina, for use in the USA. The program participants are encouraged to walk 3–5 times a week, with a weekly increase in duration. Each week, participants are prompted to read chapters from the Walk with Ease workbook to equip them with the tools and knowledge to achieve their walking goals, including: initial, midway, and end-point self-assessments, a guide to setting up a walking plan, a 5-step guide on what should be included in a walking session (warm-up, gentle stretching, walking, and speed up, cool down, and gentle stretching), the frequency, intensity, time (duration), and type of training (FITT) principles, and a walking diary (“Companion Workbook”). The Walk with Ease Australia program is a self-directed physical activity program and it is up to the participant to decide how much to walk based on their own goals. Once participants have completed consent, screening and eligibility processes they will be asked to complete the baseline questionnaire and receive “blinded” Fitbits (activity tracking monitors) to monitor their physical activity levels (primary outcome measure). The “blinded” Fitbits will be Fitbits that have all goal notifications and prompts to move turned off and step count will not be visible on their home screen. Access to step count through the Fitbit mobile app cannot be disabled so it is possible that participants will see their step count if they access the app. Following the 14-day data collection period, participants will be randomised and sent an electronic version of the 12-week self-directed Walk with Ease Australia book, followed by a physical copy by mail. Participants will also be invited to join a private CASCADE-OA Facebook group.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
328465
0
Lifestyle
Query!
Intervention code [2]
328466
0
Rehabilitation
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
During the intervention period, participants allocated to the Fitbit only group will receive the “blinded” Fitbit as described above. This is so that we can evaluate the true effect of the Walk with Ease Australia intervention, taking into account the interventional effect that the Fitbit will have on step count (primary outcome measure). Both groups will be able to access care as usual (i.e. continue to seek care as they usually would).
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
338054
0
Physical activity levels at 12 weeks
Query!
Assessment method [1]
338054
0
Fitbit step count
Query!
Timepoint [1]
338054
0
6-, 12- (primary), 26- , 52 weeks post-commencement of intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
444637
0
Health-related quality of life
Query!
Assessment method [1]
444637
0
Measured by the EQ-5D-5L Quality of Life. The EQ-5D-5L is a health-related multi-attribute utility quality of life instrument. It has five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Each dimension has five response levels corresponding to no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, unable to /extreme problems. Responses are coded as single-digit numbers expressing the severity level selected in each dimension. The respondent is asked to indicate their current health state by checking the box next to the most appropriate answer. A 100-point EQ visual analogue scale (VAS) is also presented and the respondent is asked to rate their current overall health (100=best health imaginable).
Query!
Timepoint [1]
444637
0
Baseline, 6-, 12-, 26- and 52 weeks post-commencement of intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
444639
0
Healthcare utilisation and medication use
Query!
Assessment method [2]
444639
0
Customised questionnaire, asking whether participants sought care from a healthcare professional, used any pain medication, other medications for their health, and bought any equipment for their physical activity or health in the last 4 weeks.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
444639
0
Baseline, 6-, 12-, 26- and 52 weeks post-commencement of intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
444646
0
Adoption of Walk with Ease Australia
Query!
Assessment method [3]
444646
0
Adoption will be evaluated using measures of reach and uptake. We will evaluate responses to the screening and the baseline demographic questionnaires. Specifically, we will evaluate the characteristics of enrolled participants: state, postcode, education level, race/ethnicity, and languages spoken at home.
Query!
Timepoint [3]
444646
0
Baseline, assessed at completion of study
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
444650
0
Sustainability of the Walk with Ease Australia
Query!
Assessment method [4]
444650
0
Evaluated using measures of maintenance through a customised questionnaire which includes questions asking participants whether they continued to use the intervention.
Query!
Timepoint [4]
444650
0
Participants allocated into the intervention group will be asked survey questions at 26- and 52-week post-commencement of intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
434316
0
Pain intensity of most painful hip or knee joint
Query!
Assessment method [5]
434316
0
Participants will be asked to self-report their average hip/knee pain over the past week on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) with terminal descriptors of ‘no pain’ (score 0) and ‘worst pain imaginable’ (score 10)
Query!
Timepoint [5]
434316
0
Baseline, 6-, 12-, 26- and 52 weeks post-commencement of intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
444636
0
Physical function
Query!
Assessment method [6]
444636
0
Measured by the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) or the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS). Respectively, there are 42/40 questions in each questionnaire. Standardised answer options are given in 5 Likert boxes with scores from 0 to 4 (none, mild, moderate, severe and extreme) to answer the questions. The recall period is one week.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
444636
0
Baseline, 6-, 12-, 26- and 52 weeks post-commencement of intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [7]
434317
0
Self-efficacy for managing OA pain
Query!
Assessment method [7]
434317
0
This will be measured by the Arthritis Self Efficacy Pain subscale (PSE). 5 items are rated on a 1 (very uncertain) to 10 (very certain) rating scale. The recall period is now or at the present time.
Query!
Timepoint [7]
434317
0
Baseline, 6-, 12-, 26- and 52 weeks post-commencement of intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [8]
444638
0
Absenteeism and presenteeism from work
Query!
Assessment method [8]
444638
0
Measured by the Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ) Short Form. The HPQ short form measures hours of work lost (absenteeism) and work performance (presenteeism). It includes 7 items asking hours of work, experience at work and job performance. The recall period is 4 weeks (28 days).
Query!
Timepoint [8]
444638
0
Baseline, 6-, 12-, 26- and 52 weeks post-commencement of intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [9]
444648
0
Feasibility of Walk with Ease Australia
Query!
Assessment method [9]
444648
0
Feasibility will be measured using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) (39) and additional survey questions. Only participants allocated to the intervention group will be asked these questions at the 12 week follow up.
Query!
Timepoint [9]
444648
0
12 weeks post-commencement of intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [10]
444649
0
Fidelity to the Walk with Ease Australia intervention
Query!
Assessment method [10]
444649
0
Fidelity to the intervention will be evaluated using measures of adherence. We will use weekly step count data from participants’ Fitbits to see if the participants are progressively increasing their step count, as advised in the Walk with Ease Australia book. We will also be asking participants whether they read the Walk with Ease Australia book, used the Companion Workbook and how often they interacted with the Facebook Group.
Query!
Timepoint [10]
444649
0
12 weeks post-commencement of intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [11]
444645
0
Acceptability of Walk with Ease Australia
Query!
Assessment method [11]
444645
0
Acceptability will be measured using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure and additional customised survey questions that ask participants how satisfied they were with the intervention. These questions will only be asked to participants allocated to the intervention group.
Query!
Timepoint [11]
444645
0
12-weeks post- commencement intervention
Query!
Secondary outcome [12]
444647
0
Appropriateness of Walk with Ease Australia
Query!
Assessment method [12]
444647
0
Appropriateness will be measured using the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM). Participants allocated to the intervention group will be asked this at 12-week follow up.
Query!
Timepoint [12]
444647
0
12 weeks post-commencement of intervention
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Be aged 45 years or older,
Have activity-related hip or knee joint pain,
Is willing to participate in community walking
Have an average pain rating of 3 or more on the 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS, 0-10),
Be able to walk for at least 10 minutes at any pace/intensity (aided or unaided),
Have access to a GPS-tracking smartphone, and
Have internet access.
Be able to read and understand English.
Will be residing in Australia for the next 12 months
Potential participants must also be considered safe to participate in a walking trial using the Adult Pre-Screening Screening System (APSS),
and do not have joint-related stiffness or any morning stiffness that lasts beyond 30 minutes
Query!
Minimum age
45
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
People will not be eligible to participate if they do not meet the inclusion criteria above, have co-existing inflammatory arthritis including rheumatoid arthritis and gout, or are already meeting the minimum physical activity guideline requirements of 150 minutes of moderate physical activity or 75 minutes of vigorous activity per week.
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Allocation will be concealed using the REDCap randomisation module, set up by an independent researcher. An independent statistician will generate the randomisation sequences.
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Participants will be randomised (1:1) to the intervention or the control group through a computer-generated randomisation schedule using permuted blocks ratio and stratified by OA joint site, and biological sex.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Primary and secondary outcome measures will be analysed using intention-to treat. Differences between groups at baseline will be assessed using independent samples t-tests. Normal distribution of data will be accounted for based on the central limit theorem that dictates that a difference of means will be normally distributed with a sample size greater than 30 (Kamis et al 2020). If required, logistic regression will be used to compare the number of participants in each group that met the minimum daily step count requirement (7500 steps).
Changes in steps count will be analysed using a linear mixed-effects model with treatment, month and their interaction (treatment ´ month) as covariates. The correlation within recruitment settings (based on state and whether they were recruited from the community or through the OACCP) and the repeated measures will be addressed using recruitment setting and participant identification as random intercepts. Month will be treated as random effect to allow different treatment effects among participants over time. Change in outcome measures within each group and difference of the changes between groups from baseline to follow-up will be calculated using linear combinations of the estimated coefficients adjusted for baseline outcome.
Secondary analysis for missing data will be performed using multiple imputation by chained equations. Baseline variables with complete data will be used for data imputation assuming missing at random.
Pre-specified stratified analyses will be performed to examine which subgroups may respond to treatment based on these variables: index joint site (hip/knee), biological sex and recruitment setting (community vs OACCP). Moderator analyses using generalized linear models will be performed to determine if any other variables (e.g. age, baseline physical activity levels) interacted with the effect of the intervention. Frequency data and proportion will be reported for implementation outcome measures.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
7/07/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
24/10/2026
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
31/12/2027
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
414
Query!
Accrual to date
0
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
ACT,NSW,NT,QLD,SA,TAS,WA,VIC
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
316364
0
Commercial sector/Industry
Query!
Name [1]
316364
0
The Ramsay Research and Teaching Fund.
Query!
Address [1]
316364
0
Query!
Country [1]
316364
0
Australia
Query!
Funding source category [2]
316363
0
Government body
Query!
Name [2]
316363
0
The National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) under the Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF) Effective Treatments and Therapies scheme (Application ID: 2023131).
Query!
Address [2]
316363
0
Query!
Country [2]
316363
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
The University of Sydney
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
319994
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
319994
0
Query!
Address [1]
319994
0
Query!
Country [1]
319994
0
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
315168
0
Northern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
315168
0
https://www.nslhd.health.nsw.gov.au/Research/ResearchOffice/Pages/HREC.aspx
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
315168
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
315168
0
28/08/2024
Query!
Approval date [1]
315168
0
15/10/2024
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
315168
0
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common and debilitating condition affecting millions worldwide, with no known cure. Physical activity is beneficial for managing OA, but most patients fail to meet recommended activity levels. Walking is a safe, low-cost, accessible form of exercise suitable for OA patients. The Walk with Ease program, initially from the US, is a 12-week walking program designed to help OA patients manage pain and symptoms while staying active. It has proven to reduce pain, stiffness, and improve function in people with moderate to severe pain (greater than 4/10), also boosting physical activity levels in individuals with arthritis. This study will test whether Walk with Ease Australia has an effect on physical activity levels in Australians with OA through a two-arm, parallel, randomised controlled trial using a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation design. The primary endpoint is assessed at 12 weeks. After screening and consenting, participants are randomized into either the Walk with Ease Australia plus Fitbit group or the Fitbit-only group. Surveys are completed at baseline (T0), six weeks (T1), 12-weeks (T2), and follow-ups at six and 12 months (T3 and T4). We expect that people assigned to the Walk with Ease Australia will have higher physical activity levels, compared to control at 12 weeks.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
133886
0
Prof David Hunter
Query!
Address
133886
0
Kolling Institute University of Sydney 10 Westbourne Street St Leonards New South Wales 2064
Query!
Country
133886
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
133886
0
+61 294631887
Query!
Fax
133886
0
Query!
Email
133886
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
133887
0
Emily Si
Query!
Address
133887
0
Kolling Institute University of Sydney 10 Westbourne Street St Leonards New South Wales 2064
Query!
Country
133887
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
133887
0
+61 299264831
Query!
Fax
133887
0
Query!
Email
133887
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
133888
0
Sarah Kobayashi
Query!
Address
133888
0
Kolling Institute University of Sydney 10 Westbourne Street St Leonards New South Wales 2064
Query!
Country
133888
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
133888
0
+61438241868
Query!
Fax
133888
0
Query!
Email
133888
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will the study consider sharing individual participant data?
Yes
Will there be any conditions when requesting access to individual participant data?
Persons/groups eligible to request access:
•
Initially, data will be available to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. Data will become available through a public database once the major findings have been published.
Conditions for requesting access:
•
-
What individual participant data might be shared?
•
Initially, individual participant data underlying published results will be available (after de-identification). Prior to that other data may be available at the discretion of the CIs.
What types of analyses could be done with individual participant data?
•
No restrictions
When can requests for individual participant data be made (start and end dates)?
From:
Immediately following publication or as agreed by the CIs, no end date has been determined.
To:
-
Where can requests to access individual participant data be made, or data be obtained directly?
•
Initially, access will be subject to approvals by the Principal Investigator, and may require a data access agreement. Data will eventually be submitted to a public database.
Principal Investigator: Prof David Hunter (
[email protected]
)
Are there extra considerations when requesting access to individual participant data?
No
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF