Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12625000153415
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
10/01/2025
Date registered
10/02/2025
Date last updated
23/06/2025
Date data sharing statement initially provided
10/02/2025
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
The impact of dance movement therapy on women with an experience of family and domestic violence: A controlled feasibility study
Query!
Scientific title
The impact of dance movement therapy on women with an experience of family and domestic violence: A controlled feasibility study
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
313678
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Psychological well-being
336252
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Mental Health
332922
332922
0
0
Query!
Other mental health disorders
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
A trauma and violence informed framework which was developed based on the voices of women with FDV, as well as clinician’s voices (Hegarty et al., 2017) will be used to guide service provision in this study. The framework will focus on: relationship building, integrated co-ordinated care, reflective system, and environmental scan.
The DMT intervention sessions will be based on the clinical implications for DMT for trauma survivors by Liang and Bryant (2024). The intervention will be delivered by an academically qualified dance movement therapist, who is also the researcher in this study. Each session will have the following elements: opening check-in and warm-up before proceeding to the main theme and a closing activity.
The intervention will be delivered in a group setting ( of max 8 participants ), at a community setting. There will be six overall intervention sessions, spread over six weeks.
Each session will be 60min, on a weekly basis. Attendance will be monitored by a session attendance checklist.
Check in: Few examples of check in activities: Participants will be sitting in a group circle where the therapist will check in with each participant, both verbally and non-verbally to understand their mood and concerns (Koch & Hervey, 2012). Focus on breathing and specific body parts may be used as well (Chaiklin & Schmais; 1993 Levy, 1988).
Warm up: The group and therapist will decide on the music to be played, and warm up will begin. Everyone will take turns with doing one warm up movement (Chaiklin & Schmais, 1993). One person will move, and the rest of the group will imitate this movement (Koch & Harvey, 2012, Baum, 1991). The group will move rhythmically together (Chaiklin & Schmais, 1993). The therapist’s movements will reflect the participants’ expressions and will be instrumental in forming a therapeutic relationship, rapport and empathy (Baum, 1991; Chaiklin & Schmais, 1993).
Participants will be led through simple exercises focusing on exploring simple movements that will access different emotions (eg: moving fast vs moving slow, moving with weight vs moving with lightness, moving in different directions etc). Another method could include a Chacian approach (Chaiklin & Schmais,1993), which includes playing music to match the tempo of the participants in the room, moving in unison with the participants, expanding movement patterns, encouraging participants to lead movements using rhythm.
Main theme: Every session, 1-2 participants will be encouraged to bring their own music to the session and move to help express their feelings (Koch & Harvey, 2012). The participants who bring the music will be known as the “movers”. During each group session, each mover will be encouraged to improvise their movements to their chosen music by following their inner movement impulses and thoughts and feelings (Koch & Harvey, 2012). The rest of the participants in the group will watch and try to follow the movement quality of the mover through a process of imitation (Koch & Harvey, 2012). The therapist will observe the movements elicited and elaborate these verbally using imagery and symbolism.
Closure: After the main part of the session, the therapist will invite the group to come together to reflect and exchange their experiences while moving (Koch & Harvey, 2012). The therapist will encourage the use of metaphors (figurative language), and symbolism (images/symbols) as a way of verbally expressing their feelings and thoughts. The session will close with some relaxation breathing and quiet time, and personal reflection by journal writing. The overall session uses a bottom-up approach for the women to express traumatic content that they may not be able to express verbally, using movement and dance, and thereby gaining control over their body and appreciate it as a source of strength (Koch & Harvey, 2012).
References:
Baum, E. Z. (1991). Movement therapy with multiple personality disorder patients. Dissociation, 4(2), 99–104.
Chaiklin, S., & Schmais, C. (1993). The Chace approach to dance therapy. In Sandel, S. L., Chaiklin, S., & Lohn, A. Foundation of Dance/Movement Therapy: The Life and Work of Marian Chace (pp.75-97). The Marian Chace Memorial Fund
Hegarty, K., Tarzia, L., Rees, S., Fooks, A., Forsdike, K., Woodlock, D., Simpson, L., McCormack, C., Amanatidis, S. (2017). Women’s Input to a Trauma-informed systems model of care in Health settings: The WITH study.
Koch, S. C., & Harvey, S. (2012). Dance/movement therapy with traumatized dissociative patients. In S. C. Koch, T. Fuchs, M. Summa, & C. Müller (Eds.), Advances in Consciousness Research (Vol. 84, pp. 369–385). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/aicr.84.27koc
Liang, C. X., & Bryant, T. (2024). The use of dance and movement for the embodied healing of interpersonal trauma in women and girls: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 25(4), 3241–3253. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241243399
Levy, F. J. (1988). Dance/Movement Therapy. A Healing Art. AAHPERD Publications, P. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED291746
Query!
Intervention code [1]
330273
0
Lifestyle
Query!
Intervention code [2]
330274
0
Behaviour
Query!
Intervention code [3]
330275
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
CONTROL PERIOD:
Control group will be receiving treatment as usual over an 6-week period while waiting for their intervention. This refers to the usual wellbeing groups that they choose to attend at their organizations, as well as engaging in any specific counselling provided by their organization.
After the experimental group ends intervention, the waitlist control group will then be invited to attend six weeks of intervention with a follow up and complete questionnaires during each session.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
340320
0
Change in trauma symptoms
Query!
Assessment method [1]
340320
0
The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL) is a widely used DSM-correspondent self-report measure of PTSD symptoms (Weathers et al., 2013). PCL-5 is a psychometrically sound measure which includes 20 symptoms of PTSD as outlined in DSM V, such as the following subscales: re-experiencing, avoidance, negative alterations in cognition and mood, and hyperarousal. It uses a 5-point Likert-scale.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
340320
0
Primary outcome measure (PCL-5; participant self-report). (20 items, 5 minutes) Completed by participants in a paper and pencil version collected at 1)During enrolment (baseline(t0)) 2)At the start of the first intervention session(, pretest (t1)) 3) At the end of intervention period, at the end of the final 6th session (t6). 4)6 weeks after completion of intervention sessions (t8).
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
444132
0
Validity of outcome measure tool ( DOB BREVE )
Query!
Assessment method [1]
444132
0
Scoring and triangulation of data between DOF BREVE and DOF BREVE SR
Query!
Timepoint [1]
444132
0
After completion of intervention ( week 7)
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
443706
0
The secondary composite outcome measure tool that will measure growth and development potential in women.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
443706
0
The secondary composite outcome measure tool that will measure growth and development potential in women includes two short versions of the DOF (Dunphy Outcomes Framework, Dunphy et al., 2023). One version is DOF BREVE, an observational tool completed by the therapist and another version is DOF-BREVE SR, a self-report completed by the participant (Dunphy et al., 2023). Both the observational and self-report versions of the DOF outcome assessment contribute to the composite measurement of growth and developmental potential in women. These include the changes in psychological, physical, social, emotional, cultural-aesthetic and integrative characteristics in women. Dunphy Outcomes Framework Self-Report (DOF BREVE SR; Dunphy et al., 2023): This is a participant self-report measure which measures the composite secondary outcome by capturing the participant's self-report of their growth and development potential including psychological, physical, social, emotional, cultural-aesthetic and integration(behaviour) domains, on a 10-point Likert-scale. The DOF BREVE SR was developed based on the results of an exploratory factor analysis of the DOF (Dunphy et al., 2020) which is a reliable and valid instrument to measure DMT outcomes. DOF BREVE SR requires further psychometric evaluation to determine its reliability and validity.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
443706
0
Outcomes using DOF BREVE and DOF BREVE SR will be administered immediately after every intervention session (Weeks 1/2/3/4/5/week 6)
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
443707
0
Acceptability of intervention by Service providers
Query!
Assessment method [3]
443707
0
Perception of the service providers to determine whether the intervention (DMT) is appropriate for symptoms of trauma. This will be asked in an open ended question format during the Focus Group. Question: How do the service providers describe and evaluate their experience of the project including planning and intervention implementation?
Query!
Timepoint [3]
443707
0
After completion of intervention ( week 7 )
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
444423
0
Acceptability of intervention from participants
Query!
Assessment method [4]
444423
0
Perception of the participants to determine whether the intervention (DMT) is appropriate for symptoms of trauma. This will be asked in an open ended question format during the Focus Group. Question: Question: How do the participants describe and evaluate their experience of the project including participating in assessments and interventions?
Query!
Timepoint [4]
444423
0
This will be at the end of the last (6th) intervention session ) ( t6)
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
444424
0
Attrition rates of participants
Query!
Assessment method [5]
444424
0
Attrition rate = (Number of participants lost to follow-up) divided by (Total number of participants enrolled initially) multiplied by 100 percent The data from study specific screening log will used to calculate overall number of participants who enrolled initially. Study specific session attendance logs will be kept to record attrition. where attendance will be recorded at each time point specified below.
Query!
Timepoint [5]
444424
0
1)Week 0 ( total number enrolled ) 2) Immediately after every intervention session ( Week 1/2/3/4/5/week 6) 2)After completion of intervention ( week 7) 3) 4 weeks and 8 weeks post-intervention completion
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
444133
0
Recruitment rate of participants
Query!
Assessment method [6]
444133
0
Rate of participants who were recruited to the study vs those who expressed interest, however, did not join. A study-specific screening log will be used to record key details of participants who express interest in the study. Details of participants who provide consent will also be recorded in the study-specific screening log. This will provide information on the number of participants who indicate interest vs those provide consent to participate in the study.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
444133
0
Collected at Week 0.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
• Interested and available to attend dance therapy for six sessions.
• Females aged 18 years of age or above and are consumers of the organization participating in the study.
• Identify as someone who has had an experience of family and domestic violence,
• Able to provide informed consent.
• Willing to complete outcome measures pre and post treatment sessions.
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Insufficient command of English for basic communication with therapist
• Participants for which facility staff recommend that the program may not be appropriate risky
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Treatment
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Sealed opaque envelopes
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Online randomization program
Query!
Masking / blinding
Open (masking not used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
Statistical analyses of the data will be performed using SPSS (version 24) or similar statistical packages. Demographic statistics will be presented in our publication on recruitment and retention of participants in both groups, including possible reasons for dropouts at different stages.
Missing values may include data points that are not recorded due to non-response, attrition, equipment malfunctions or incomplete data entry.
These missing values from scales will be imputed using the individual mean of the subscale based on the participant’s other answers at the same measurement point. To reduce potential bias introduced by dropouts, an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis will be conducted for all participants who had completed the PCL-5 (t0) (van Ginkel et al., 2019).
Linear mixed model analysis (LMM) will be conducted for imputed data. This model will include main effects and interactions between groups (AB/BA) and time points. The timepoints (t1 and t6) will be analysed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) for primary outcome measure (PCL-5), to determine main effects between intervention and waitlist control cluster.
A random intercept model will be used to account for within-subject variation. These analyses will be performed using the formula provided by van Ginkel et al. (2019), which involves reformulating the ANOVA model as a regression model. This repeated measures (mixed model) ANOVA will analyse the changes in outcome measures (DOF BREVE & DOF BREVE SR) over time and compare each participant’s results at the following timepoints (t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6), using multiple F tests.
Finally, the change scores over the timepoints for PCL-5 (t1 and t6) will be correlated with change scores of other significant measures using the DOF BREVE and DOF BREVE SR to determine connections between these measures.
Focus Group: (Qualitative analysis)
Focus group interviews will be conducted at the end of the last intervention session. All focus group interviews will be audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. MAXqda software will be used to analyse the sample. The interviews will be analysed using thematic analysis (Clarke & Braun, 2017)
Steps taken will include Familiarization of data, generation of initial codes, searching for themes from data, reviewing themes, defining and naming themes and writing the report.
Reference
van Ginkel, J., Linting, M., Rippe, R., & van der Voort, A. (2019). Rebutting existing misconceptions about multiple imputation as a method for handling missing data. Journal of Personality Assessment, 102, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1530680
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Active, not recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
28/03/2025
Query!
Actual
28/03/2025
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
24/04/2025
Query!
Actual
24/04/2025
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
8/08/2026
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
30
Query!
Accrual to date
Query!
Final
30
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
WA
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
318141
0
University
Query!
Name [1]
318141
0
University of Melbourne
Query!
Address [1]
318141
0
Query!
Country [1]
318141
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
University
Query!
Name
University of Melbourne
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
320527
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
320527
0
Query!
Address [1]
320527
0
Query!
Country [1]
320527
0
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
283354
0
Individual
Query!
Name [1]
283354
0
Dr Imogen Clark, University of Melbourne
Query!
Address [1]
283354
0
Query!
Country [1]
283354
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [2]
283564
0
Individual
Query!
Name [2]
283564
0
Dr Ella Dumaresq, University of Melbourne
Query!
Address [2]
283564
0
Query!
Country [2]
283564
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [3]
283355
0
Individual
Query!
Name [3]
283355
0
Professor Sabine Koch, Director Research Institute of Creative Arts Therapies, Alanus University, in Germany. She is also an honorary fellow at Creative Arts and Music Therapy Research Unit, University of Melbourne, Australia.
Query!
Address [3]
283355
0
Query!
Country [3]
283355
0
Germany
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
316787
0
University of Melbourne Central Human Research Ethics Committee
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
316787
0
https://research.unimelb.edu.au/work-with-us/ethics-and-integrity/our-ethics-committees
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
316787
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
316787
0
29/01/2025
Query!
Approval date [1]
316787
0
04/04/2025
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
316787
0
2025-31722-64772-3
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
The main aim will be to test the effectiveness of dance therapy on reducing symptoms of trauma in women with experience of family and domestic violence. The secondary aim will be to investigate the influence of dance movement therapy on overall wellbeing domains on women with an experience of family and domestic violence. Finally, as this is a new trial, the last aim will be to test acceptability and feasibility of implementing this intervention.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
The date of participant enrolment was an educated guess, as specific dates were required to project the timeline and data collection in the protocol. Recruitment was not undertaken until ethics approval, hence participants were not recruited as projected on 28/03/2025.
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
139010
0
Dr Imogen Clark
Query!
Address
139010
0
Faculty of Fine Arts and Music, The University of Melbourne AUSTRALIA Office: Building 862, Room 228, 234 St Kilda Rd Southbank VIC 3006
Query!
Country
139010
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
139010
0
+614 19 371 960
Query!
Fax
139010
0
Query!
Email
139010
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
139011
0
Thilaga Letchumi, Sarunga Raja
Query!
Address
139011
0
Faculty of Fine Arts and Music, The University of Melbourne AUSTRALIA Office: Building 862, Room 228, 234 St Kilda Rd Southbank VIC 3006
Query!
Country
139011
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
139011
0
+61 413178137
Query!
Fax
139011
0
Query!
Email
139011
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
139012
0
Thilaga Letchumi, Sarunga Raja
Query!
Address
139012
0
Faculty of Fine Arts and Music, The University of Melbourne AUSTRALIA Office: Building 862, Room 228, 234 St Kilda Rd Southbank VIC 3006
Query!
Country
139012
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
139012
0
+61 413178137
Query!
Fax
139012
0
Query!
Email
139012
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will the study consider sharing individual participant data?
No
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Type
Citation
Link
Email
Other Details
Attachment
Informed consent form
05.HREC approved Consent form versionPARTICIPANTS.pdf
Informed consent form
03.HREC approved Consent form versionSERVICE PROVIDERS.pdf
Other
Participant plain language statement
04.HREC aproved PLS Participants.pdf
Other
Service provider focus group plain language statem...
[
More Details
]
02.HREC approved PLS Service Providers .pdf
Study protocol
2025-04-28Intervention Protocol.docx
Ethical approval
2025-04-04 HREC APPROVAL.pdf
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF