Please note that the copy function is not enabled for this field.
If you wish to
modify
existing outcomes, please copy and paste the current outcome text into the Update field.
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
LOGIN
CREATE ACCOUNT
MY TRIALS
REGISTER TRIAL
FAQs
HINTS AND TIPS
DEFINITIONS
Trial Review
The safety and scientific validity of this study is the responsibility of the study sponsor and investigators. Listing a study does not mean it has been endorsed by the ANZCTR. Before participating in a study, talk to your health care provider and refer to this
information for consumers
Download to PDF
Trial registered on ANZCTR
Registration number
ACTRN12625000043437
Ethics application status
Approved
Date submitted
10/12/2024
Date registered
20/01/2025
Date last updated
15/06/2025
Date data sharing statement initially provided
20/01/2025
Type of registration
Prospectively registered
Titles & IDs
Public title
Peripheral intravenous device selection and insertion by a vascular access specialist for hospital inpatients (The PEER Study).
Query!
Scientific title
PEripheral intravenous device sElection and insertion by a vasculaR access specialist for hospital inpatients: a randomised controlled trial and embedded feasibility study.
Query!
Secondary ID [1]
313544
0
Nil known
Query!
Universal Trial Number (UTN)
Query!
Trial acronym
The PEER Study
Query!
Linked study record
Query!
Health condition
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied:
Peripheral intravenous device selection and insertion by a vascular access expert (Short/Long PIVC; Midline Catheter; Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter)
336111
0
Query!
Condition category
Condition code
Infection
332596
332596
0
0
Query!
Other infectious diseases
Query!
Public Health
332595
332595
0
0
Query!
Health service research
Query!
Intervention/exposure
Study type
Interventional
Query!
Description of intervention(s) / exposure
Intervention
A Vascular Access Specialist [VAS] can be defined as a clinician with advanced knowledge in vascular access insertion. This includes device selection; device management in terms of treatment duration and medication administration guidelines, and the use of ultrasound guidance for device placement.
Through evaluation of the patients medical notes/treatment plan, and direct assessment of the patient, the VAS will determine the best device choice. This assessment should take between 10-20 minutes.
The VAS will assess ALL potential participants referred to the study prior to randomisation. At this time the VAS will determine the most appropriate device for the participants needs and this decision will be recorded within clinical trial data files and remain confidential. The participant will then be randomised.
If randomised to intervention, device selection and insertion will be carried out by the VAS and the peripheral intravenous device (per VAS assessment; with/without ultrasound guidance) will be inserted. PIVC device insertion by the VAS will take no longer than device insertion performed as per standard care (no more than 15 minutes).
Post insertion, the PIVC device care will be undertaken as per standard hospital policy. In addition to standard care, the Research Nurse will review both intervention and control participants PIVC sites daily (5 minutes duration) until 48 hours post device removal.
The Research Nurse will also access clinical notes for information relating to PIVC management (i.e. ongoing treatment plan/ complications/ need for device replacement etc). This will take 5-10 minutes daily.
Adherence to the intervention will be assessed under feasibility outcomes.
Query!
Intervention code [1]
330175
0
Treatment: Devices
Query!
Intervention code [2]
330134
0
Treatment: Other
Query!
Comparator / control treatment
Control
If the patient is randomised to standard care, they will receive intravenous device selection and insertion by a generalist inserter including the option to escalate to another clinician or service, as per current hospital practice.
Generalist inserter defined as a clinician who is credentialed as per hospital policy to insert PIVCs within their existing clinical role (e.g., bedside nurse or medical team).
The VAS assessment and device selection prior to randomisation will be collected and recorded but remains confidential until data analysis.
Query!
Control group
Active
Query!
Outcomes
Primary outcome [1]
340116
0
All cause device failure: a composite of infiltration/extravasation, blockage/occlusion (with/without leakage), phlebitis (pain score equal or greater than 2 alone; OR two or more signs/symptoms of either: pain/tenderness (score of 2 or more); erythema/redness; swelling or palpable cord) ), thrombosis, dislodgement (complete/partial) or infection (laboratory-confirmed local/bloodstream infection)
Query!
Assessment method [1]
340116
0
Weekdays the Research Nurse will: check the insertion site daily for complications and record intravenous therapy delivered. After the weekend the research nurse will check the participants medical record to find out if there were any complications during the weekend. At device removal, the Research Nurse will record time and reason. Should complications arise, photographs of devices may be taken by one of the research team members (VAS/Research Nurse) if time permits and suitable equipment is available. A separate Qld Health Press Release Form will be completed by participant to ensure permission to use images in future conferences and presentations or for research/educational purposes. There will be no identifying features and images will be de-identified using a unique code. 48 hours after device removal: The following will be collected: positive microbiology results from blood cultures, device tips or site swabs; treatment given for infection; adverse events, including any treatment required.
Query!
Timepoint [1]
340116
0
Assessed daily from allocated IV device insertion until 48 hours after device removal.
Query!
Primary outcome [2]
340115
0
Primary feasibility outcome: The feasibility of conducting a definitive RCT will be assessed as a composite outcome as all criteria need to be met in order for the study to continue. The following criteria established by previous PIVC RCTs will be measured: 1. Eligibility; 2. Recruitment; 3. Retention and attrition; 4. Protocol adherence; 5. Missing data. If the interim analysis finds feasibility outcomes are being met and there are no safety issues identified with the protocol, the study will continue to recruit (second phase adequately powered RCT). If feasibility outcomes are not being met or safety issues are identified, the study will cease at this time.
Query!
Assessment method [2]
340115
0
Primary feasibility outcomes will be assessed through direct assessment of the number of eligible participants being referred to the Research Team; the number of participant recruited relative to the study timeline (determined from hospital records compared with number of participants recruited); the number of participants who drop out or are lost to the study through as yet unidentified means (determined from study records); adherence by the research team to the implementation of the protocol, and the amount of missing data exhibited in the data base (determined from study records).
Query!
Timepoint [2]
340115
0
Eligibility and recruitment will be assessed on recruitment of 100 participants. Retention and attrition assessed weekly until discharge. Protocol adherence and missing data will be assessed at the end of the intervention.
Query!
Secondary outcome [1]
443199
0
3. Number of failed insertion attempts;
Query!
Assessment method [1]
443199
0
Direct observation/reporting
Query!
Timepoint [1]
443199
0
At the time of insertion
Query!
Secondary outcome [2]
442823
0
1. Individual PIVC complications (each as defined above in Primary clinical outcomes)
Query!
Assessment method [2]
442823
0
Direct assessment/ Clinical notes/ pathology results.
Query!
Timepoint [2]
442823
0
Onset at insertion and up until 48 hours post removal of device.
Query!
Secondary outcome [3]
443198
0
2. First Insertion Success
Query!
Assessment method [3]
443198
0
Direct observation/reporting
Query!
Timepoint [3]
443198
0
At the time of insertion
Query!
Secondary outcome [4]
443201
0
5. Patient reported pain at device insertion (0-10 rating scale)
Query!
Assessment method [4]
443201
0
Direct observation/ reporting
Query!
Timepoint [4]
443201
0
At the time of insertion
Query!
Secondary outcome [5]
443200
0
4. Dwell-time (hours) from device insertion to removal;
Query!
Assessment method [5]
443200
0
Direct observation/Clinical notes
Query!
Timepoint [5]
443200
0
After removal of device
Query!
Secondary outcome [6]
448753
0
6. Failed insertion
Query!
Assessment method [6]
448753
0
The complete failure to insert any device.
Query!
Timepoint [6]
448753
0
At the time of insertion attempt.
Query!
Eligibility
Key inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria
• Greater than or equal to 18 years of age
• Requiring peripherally compatible intravenous therapy for greater than 24 hours
• Informed written consent
Query!
Minimum age
18
Years
Query!
Query!
Maximum age
No limit
Query!
Query!
Sex
Both males and females
Query!
Can healthy volunteers participate?
No
Query!
Key exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
• Greater than or equal to 18 years of age
• Receiving end-of-life care
• Limited English/ without interpreter
• Inability to consent for self (i.e. cognitive impairment)
• Previous study enrolment
Query!
Study design
Purpose of the study
Prevention
Query!
Allocation to intervention
Randomised controlled trial
Query!
Procedure for enrolling a subject and allocating the treatment (allocation concealment procedures)
Using a central, web-based randomisation service, with allocation concealment prior to randomisation
Query!
Methods used to generate the sequence in which subjects will be randomised (sequence generation)
Participants will be randomized 1:1 to the VAS or standard care group, with randomly varied block sizes of 4 and 6.
Query!
Masking / blinding
Blinded (masking used)
Query!
Who is / are masked / blinded?
The people assessing the outcomes
The people analysing the results/data
Query!
Query!
Query!
Query!
Intervention assignment
Parallel
Query!
Other design features
Query!
Phase
Not Applicable
Query!
Type of endpoint/s
Efficacy
Query!
Statistical methods / analysis
RCT data will be exported from REDCap to IBM SPSS version 27 for analysis. If feasibility criteria are met and phase 2 data collection completed, the primary clinical outcome of device failure will be examined using logistic regression with group (generalist/VAS) included as the main effect. It will be reported as odds ratio with 95% confidence interval. Other secondary clinical outcomes will be compared between groups with appropriate parametric or non-parametric techniques. P values <0.05 will be considered significant. Analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle. The study will be reported in line with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement.
Query!
Recruitment
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Query!
Date of first participant enrolment
Anticipated
2/06/2025
Query!
Actual
2/06/2025
Query!
Date of last participant enrolment
Anticipated
29/08/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Date of last data collection
Anticipated
30/09/2025
Query!
Actual
Query!
Sample size
Target
100
Query!
Accrual to date
17
Query!
Final
Query!
Recruitment in Australia
Recruitment state(s)
QLD
Query!
Recruitment hospital [1]
27384
0
Caboolture Hospital - Caboolture
Query!
Recruitment postcode(s) [1]
43497
0
4510 - Caboolture
Query!
Funding & Sponsors
Funding source category [1]
318005
0
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name [1]
318005
0
The Prince Charles Foundation
Query!
Address [1]
318005
0
Query!
Country [1]
318005
0
Australia
Query!
Primary sponsor type
Charities/Societies/Foundations
Query!
Name
The Prince Charles Foundation - Common Good Grant
Query!
Address
Query!
Country
Australia
Query!
Secondary sponsor category [1]
320347
0
None
Query!
Name [1]
320347
0
Query!
Address [1]
320347
0
Query!
Country [1]
320347
0
Query!
Other collaborator category [1]
283323
0
Hospital
Query!
Name [1]
283323
0
Caboolture Hospital, Metro North Health Service, Queensland Health
Query!
Address [1]
283323
0
Query!
Country [1]
283323
0
Australia
Query!
Other collaborator category [2]
283322
0
University
Query!
Name [2]
283322
0
University of the Sunshine Coast
Query!
Address [2]
283322
0
Query!
Country [2]
283322
0
Australia
Query!
Ethics approval
Ethics application status
Approved
Query!
Ethics committee name [1]
316666
0
Metro North Health Human Research Ethics Committee B
Query!
Ethics committee address [1]
316666
0
https://metronorth.health.qld.gov.au/research/ethics-and-governance/human-research-ethics-committee
Query!
Ethics committee country [1]
316666
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [1]
316666
0
29/08/2024
Query!
Approval date [1]
316666
0
22/10/2024
Query!
Ethics approval number [1]
316666
0
HREC/2024/MNBB.110165
Query!
Ethics committee name [2]
316667
0
University of the Sunshine Coast
Query!
Ethics committee address [2]
316667
0
humanethics@usc.edu.au
Query!
Ethics committee country [2]
316667
0
Australia
Query!
Date submitted for ethics approval [2]
316667
0
25/10/2024
Query!
Approval date [2]
316667
0
01/11/2024
Query!
Ethics approval number [2]
316667
0
A242228
Query!
Summary
Brief summary
Peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) are catheters that are inserted into peripheral veins to give medical treatment such as medicines, fluids, and blood transfusions. PIVCs are the most frequently used vascular access device in Australia. This is largely due to the current workforce model in which most PIVC inserters are doctors and nurses (generalist) inserting PIVCs within their existing roles. There are, however, alternate intravenous (IV) devices available which a specialist in Vascular Access has the specialised knowledge and skills available to insert. Our research project aims to find out whether the standard practice of a PIVC device being inserted by your bedside nurse or doctor affects how long the IV device functions and patient satisfaction. Hypothesis 1: The hypothesis for the feasibility of this study is that we will be able to recruit the required number of patients and they will remain within the study for the duration of data collection. The study will adhere to the processes outlined in the study protocol, and data will be collected and complete. Hypothesis 2: The hypothesis for the clinical outcome of the study is that the Vascular Access Specialist will be more successful than usual care in peripheral intravenous catheter insertion with lower incidence of failure and complications and less pain to the patient.
Query!
Trial website
Query!
Trial related presentations / publications
Query!
Public notes
Query!
Contacts
Principal investigator
Name
138590
0
Dr Alison Craswell
Query!
Address
138590
0
University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Drive, Sippy Downs. Queensland. 4556.
Query!
Country
138590
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
138590
0
+61 07 5456 3453
Query!
Fax
138590
0
Query!
Email
138590
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for public queries
Name
138591
0
Alison Craswell
Query!
Address
138591
0
University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Drive, Sippy Downs. Queensland. 4556.
Query!
Country
138591
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
138591
0
+61 07 5456 3453
Query!
Fax
138591
0
Query!
Email
138591
0
[email protected]
Query!
Contact person for scientific queries
Name
138592
0
Alison Craswell
Query!
Address
138592
0
University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Drive, Sippy Downs. Queensland. 4556.
Query!
Country
138592
0
Australia
Query!
Phone
138592
0
+61 07 5456 3453
Query!
Fax
138592
0
Query!
Email
138592
0
[email protected]
Query!
Data sharing statement
Will the study consider sharing individual participant data?
No
No IPD sharing reason/comment:
No individual participant date will be available for this trial due to the conditions of the Human Research Ethics Approval. aggregate cohort data may be released on reasonable request made to the Chief Investigator. This will be assessed on a case by case basis.
De-identified
What supporting documents are/will be available?
No Supporting Document Provided
Results publications and other study-related documents
Documents added manually
No documents have been uploaded by study researchers.
Documents added automatically
No additional documents have been identified.
Download to PDF